Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review) David Dailey (Monday, 30 April)
task list Schalk Neethling (Saturday, 28 April)
Re: missing principle Karl Dubost (Friday, 27 April)
Re: missing principle bhopgood@brookes.ac.uk (Friday, 27 April)
- Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal Ian Hickson (Thursday, 26 April)
- Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer (Friday, 27 April)
- Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal Ian Hickson (Friday, 27 April)
- Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal Dave Raggett (Friday, 27 April)
- Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal Matthew Raymond (Friday, 27 April)
- Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal Dave Raggett (Saturday, 28 April)
- Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal Maciej Stachowiak (Saturday, 28 April)
- Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer (Saturday, 28 April)
- Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal Maciej Stachowiak (Saturday, 28 April)
- Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal John Boyer (Saturday, 28 April)
- Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal Maciej Stachowiak (Sunday, 29 April)
- Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal John Boyer (Sunday, 29 April)
- Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal Daniel Glazman (Sunday, 29 April)
- Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal John Boyer (Sunday, 29 April)
- Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal Daniel Glazman (Sunday, 29 April)
- Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal John Boyer (Monday, 30 April)
- Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal Maciej Stachowiak (Sunday, 29 April)
- Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal John Boyer (Sunday, 29 April)
- Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal Doug Schepers (Sunday, 29 April)
- Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal Maciej Stachowiak (Sunday, 29 April)
- Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal Maciej Stachowiak (Sunday, 29 April)
- Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal Doug Schepers (Sunday, 29 April)
- Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal Maciej Stachowiak (Sunday, 29 April)
- Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal John Boyer (Monday, 30 April)
- Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal Maciej Stachowiak (Sunday, 29 April)
- Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal Preston L. Bannister (Sunday, 29 April)
- Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal Maurice (Monday, 30 April)
- Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal John Boyer (Monday, 30 April)
Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal Anne van Kesteren (Saturday, 28 April)
Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal Mike Schinkel (Saturday, 28 April)
- Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much? Sander van Lambalgen (Thursday, 26 April)
- RE: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much? Dailey, David P. (Thursday, 26 April)
- Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much? Mark Birbeck (Thursday, 26 April)
Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much? Mark Birbeck (Friday, 27 April)
Re: HTML version issue summary? Jonas Sicking (Wednesday, 25 April)
Re: HTML version issue summary? L. David Baron (Wednesday, 25 April)
Re: HTML version issue summary? Dão Gottwald (Wednesday, 25 April)
Re: HTML version issue summary? Dão Gottwald (Wednesday, 25 April)
Re: HTML version issue summary? Dannii (Wednesday, 25 April)
Re: HTML version issue summary? Jeff Schiller (Wednesday, 25 April)
Re: HTML version issue summary? Matthew Raymond (Wednesday, 25 April)
Re: HTML version issue summary? Sander Tekelenburg (Wednesday, 25 April)
Re: HTML version issue summary? Karl Dubost (Monday, 30 April)
Re[4]: New html-element: table3 Dmitry Turin (Thursday, 26 April)
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt Arthur Jennings (Saturday, 21 April)
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt Patrick Taylor (Saturday, 21 April)
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt Maciej Stachowiak (Sunday, 22 April)
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt Dailey, David P. (Sunday, 22 April)
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt Gregory J. Rosmaita (Sunday, 22 April)
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt Daniel Glazman (Monday, 23 April)
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt Dan Connolly (Monday, 23 April)
Feature Strings Jeff Schiller (Thursday, 19 April)
- Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype Jonas Sicking (Tuesday, 17 April)
- Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype Matthew Ratzloff (Tuesday, 17 April)
- Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype Maciej Stachowiak (Tuesday, 17 April)
- Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype Simon Pieters (Tuesday, 17 April)
- Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype Matthew Ratzloff (Tuesday, 17 April)
- Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype Karl Dubost (Wednesday, 18 April)
- The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Matthew Raymond (Wednesday, 18 April)
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Dannii (Wednesday, 18 April)
- RE: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Chris Wilson (Wednesday, 18 April)
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Lachlan Hunt (Thursday, 19 April)
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Karl Dubost (Thursday, 19 April)
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Anne van Kesteren (Thursday, 19 April)
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Lachlan Hunt (Thursday, 19 April)
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Henri Sivonen (Thursday, 19 April)
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) James Graham (Thursday, 19 April)
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Geoffrey Sneddon (Thursday, 19 April)
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Lachlan Hunt (Friday, 20 April)
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo (Thursday, 19 April)
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Dão Gottwald (Thursday, 19 April)
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo (Thursday, 19 April)
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Dão Gottwald (Thursday, 19 April)
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Magnus Kristiansen (Thursday, 19 April)
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo (Thursday, 19 April)
- RE: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Chris Wilson (Thursday, 19 April)
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Sander van Lambalgen (Thursday, 19 April)
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo (Thursday, 19 April)
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Patrick Taylor (Thursday, 19 April)
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| Lachlan Hunt (Friday, 20 April)
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| Patrick Taylor (Friday, 20 April)
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Dão Gottwald (Wednesday, 18 April)
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Matthew Raymond (Wednesday, 18 April)
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Michael A. Puls II (Wednesday, 18 April)
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Henri Sivonen (Wednesday, 18 April)
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Michael A. Puls II (Wednesday, 18 April)
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo (Wednesday, 18 April)
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Michael A. Puls II (Wednesday, 18 April)
RE: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Chris Wilson (Wednesday, 18 April)
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Bill Mason (Wednesday, 18 April)
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo (Wednesday, 18 April)
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Henri Sivonen (Wednesday, 18 April)
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Lachlan Hunt (Thursday, 19 April)
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Dylan Smith (Thursday, 19 April)
Re: The argument for |bugmode| Sander Tekelenburg (Thursday, 19 April)
Re: The argument for |bugmode| Matthew Raymond (Thursday, 19 April)
Re: The argument for |bugmode| Sander Tekelenburg (Thursday, 19 April)
RE: The argument for |bugmode| Chris Wilson (Thursday, 19 April)
RE: The argument for |bugmode| Håkon Wium Lie (Thursday, 19 April)
Re: The argument for |bugmode| Matthew Raymond (Friday, 20 April)
Re: The argument for |bugmode| Matthew Ratzloff (Friday, 20 April)
RE: The argument for |bugmode| Chris Wilson (Friday, 20 April)
Re: The argument for |bugmode| Terje Bless (Friday, 20 April)
Re: The argument for |bugmode| Maciej Stachowiak (Friday, 20 April)
Re: The argument for |bugmode| Terje Bless (Friday, 20 April)
Re: The argument for |bugmode| Maciej Stachowiak (Friday, 20 April)
Re: The argument for |bugmode| Matthew Raymond (Friday, 20 April)
Re: The argument for |bugmode| Terje Bless (Friday, 20 April)
Re: The argument for |bugmode| Terje Bless (Friday, 20 April)
Re: The argument for |bugmode| Matthew Raymond (Saturday, 21 April)
Re: The argument for |bugmode| Terje Bless (Saturday, 21 April)
Re: The argument for |bugmode| Dão Gottwald (Saturday, 21 April)
Re: The argument for |bugmode| Matthew Raymond (Saturday, 21 April)
Re: The argument for |bugmode| Terje Bless (Saturday, 21 April)
Re: The argument for |bugmode| Kornel Lesinski (Saturday, 21 April)
Re: The argument for |bugmode| Matthew Raymond (Sunday, 22 April)
Re: The argument for |bugmode| Roger Johansson (Sunday, 22 April)
Re: The argument for |bugmode| Henri Sivonen (Friday, 20 April)
Re: The argument for |bugmode| Henri Sivonen (Friday, 20 April)
RE: The argument for |bugmode| Chris Wilson (Thursday, 19 April)
RE: The argument for |bugmode| Sander Tekelenburg (Thursday, 19 April)
RE: The argument for |bugmode| Chris Wilson (Friday, 20 April)
Re: The argument for |bugmode| Matthew Raymond (Friday, 20 April)
RE: The argument for |bugmode| Sander Tekelenburg (Saturday, 21 April)
Re: The argument for |bugmode| Lachlan Hunt (Thursday, 19 April)
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Lachlan Hunt (Friday, 20 April)
Re: The argument for |bugmode| Matthew Ratzloff (Friday, 20 April)
Update on affiliation Alexander Graf (Friday, 20 April)
RE: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype Chris Wilson (Tuesday, 17 April)
Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype Murray Maloney (Wednesday, 18 April)
oops Chris Wilson (Sunday, 15 April)
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Kornel Lesinski (Sunday, 15 April)
legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate] Dailey, David P. (Sunday, 15 April)
Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate] Maciej Stachowiak (Sunday, 15 April)
Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate] Preston L. Bannister (Monday, 16 April)
Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate] Maciej Stachowiak (Monday, 16 April)
Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate] Henk-Jan de Boer (Monday, 16 April)
Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate] Dão Gottwald (Tuesday, 17 April)
Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate] Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo (Tuesday, 17 April)
Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate] Dão Gottwald (Tuesday, 17 April)
Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate] Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo (Tuesday, 17 April)
Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate] Dão Gottwald (Tuesday, 17 April)
Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate] Bruce Boughton (Tuesday, 17 April)
RE: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate] Chris Wilson (Tuesday, 17 April)
Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate] Henk-Jan de Boer (Tuesday, 17 April)
Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate] Dão Gottwald (Tuesday, 17 April)
Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate] liorean (Tuesday, 17 April)
Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate] Henk-Jan de Boer (Tuesday, 17 April)
Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate] Lachlan Hunt (Monday, 16 April)
Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate] James Graham (Monday, 16 April)
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Mike Schinkel (Monday, 16 April)
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Joe D'Andrea (Sunday, 15 April)
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Henri Sivonen (Sunday, 15 April)
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Sean Fraser (Sunday, 15 April)
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate aurélien levy (Sunday, 15 April)
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate liorean (Monday, 16 April)
HTML/XHTML Schalk Neethling (Saturday, 14 April)
regrets Daniel Glazman (Friday, 13 April)
Re: Versioning and html[5] Karl Dubost (Friday, 13 April)
Re: Versioning and html[5] Boris Zbarsky (Thursday, 12 April)
Re: Versioning and html[5] Sander Tekelenburg (Thursday, 12 April)
Re: Versioning and html[5] Dave Raggett (Thursday, 12 April)
Re: Versioning and html[5] Simon Pieters (Thursday, 12 April)
- RE: Versioning and html[5] Chris Wilson (Thursday, 12 April)
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Bruce Boughton (Friday, 13 April)
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Lachlan Hunt (Saturday, 14 April)
- RE: Versioning and html[5] Ian Hickson (Sunday, 15 April)
- RE: Versioning and html[5] Dave Raggett (Monday, 16 April)
- RE: Versioning and html[5] Ian Hickson (Monday, 16 April)
- RE: Versioning and html[5] Dave Raggett (Monday, 16 April)
- RE: Versioning and html[5] Dailey, David P. (Monday, 16 April)
- RE: Versioning and html[5] Ian Hickson (Monday, 16 April)
RE: Versioning and html[5] Chris Wilson (Monday, 16 April)
Re: Versioning and html[5] Maciej Stachowiak (Monday, 16 April)
RE: Versioning and html[5] Ian Hickson (Monday, 16 April)
Re: Versioning and html[5] Boris Zbarsky (Friday, 13 April)
Re: Versioning and html[5] Geoffrey Sneddon (Friday, 13 April)
<object> attributes (Was: Versioning and html[5]) Ian Hickson (Thursday, 12 April)
Re: Versioning and html[5] Dão Gottwald (Thursday, 12 April)
Re: Versioning and html[5] Ian Hickson (Thursday, 12 April)
RE: Versioning and html[5] Ian Hickson (Thursday, 12 April)
Re: Versioning and html[5] Mihai Sucan (Friday, 13 April)
Re: Versioning and html[5] Maciej Stachowiak (Friday, 13 April)
RE: Versioning and html[5] Matthew Ratzloff (Friday, 13 April)
Re: Versioning and html[5] Joe D'Andrea (Saturday, 14 April)
RE: Versioning and html[5] Sander Tekelenburg (Sunday, 15 April)
RE: Versioning and html[5] Joe D'Andrea (Monday, 16 April)
Re: Versioning and html[5] Arthur Jennings (Monday, 16 April)
Re: Versioning and html[5] Jonas Sicking (Tuesday, 17 April)
wg members status Daniel Glazman (Wednesday, 11 April)
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Doug Jones (Tuesday, 10 April)
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Dao Gottwald (Tuesday, 10 April)
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Daniel Glazman (Tuesday, 10 April)
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Raven Brooks (Tuesday, 10 April)
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Henrik Dvergsdal (Tuesday, 10 April)
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Geoffrey Sneddon (Tuesday, 10 April)
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Daniel Schattenkirchner (Tuesday, 10 April)
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Shawn Medero (Tuesday, 10 April)
- RE: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 -- procedural issue Dailey, David P. (Tuesday, 10 April)
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Doug Schepers (Tuesday, 10 April)
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Craig Saila (Tuesday, 10 April)
- RE: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Chris Wilson (Tuesday, 10 April)
- RE: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 David Dailey (Tuesday, 10 April)
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 L. David Baron (Tuesday, 10 April)
Re: Level of specification detail (Was Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5) Mike Schinkel (Thursday, 12 April)
Re: Level of specification detail Dylan Smith (Thursday, 12 April)
Re: Level of specification detail (Was Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5) Nick Drago (Thursday, 12 April)
Re: Level of specification detail (Was Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5) Maciej Stachowiak (Wednesday, 11 April)
Re: Level of specification detail (Was Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5) Karl Dubost (Thursday, 12 April)
Re: Level of specification detail (Was Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5) Benjamin West (Friday, 13 April)
RE: Level of specification detail (Was Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5) Chris Wilson (Friday, 13 April)
Re: Level of specification detail (Was Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5) liorean (Thursday, 12 April)
Re: Level of specification detail Anne van Kesteren (Thursday, 12 April)
Re: Level of specification detail (Was Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5) Dylan Smith (Friday, 13 April)
Re: Level of specification detail (Was Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5) Dan Connolly (Friday, 13 April)
RE: Level of specification detail (Was Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5) Chris Wilson (Friday, 13 April)
Re: Level of specification detail Sander Tekelenburg (Thursday, 12 April)
Re: Level of specification detail Mike Schinkel (Saturday, 14 April)
Re: Level of specification detail (Was Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5) Mike Schinkel (Thursday, 12 April)
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Josef Spillner (Wednesday, 11 April)
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Maciej Stachowiak (Wednesday, 11 April)
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 James Graham (Tuesday, 10 April)
RE: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Robert Brodrecht (Tuesday, 10 April)
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Ian Hickson (Tuesday, 10 April)
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Roger Johansson (Tuesday, 10 April)
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 cadunn (Tuesday, 10 April)
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 deres (Tuesday, 10 April)
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Carol King (Tuesday, 10 April)
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 David McFarland (Tuesday, 10 April)
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Rimantas Liubertas (Tuesday, 10 April)
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Elliott Sprehn (Tuesday, 10 April)
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Elliott Sprehn (Tuesday, 10 April)
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Niko Neugebauer (Tuesday, 10 April)
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Kai Hendry (Wednesday, 11 April)
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Sander Tekelenburg (Wednesday, 11 April)
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Philip Taylor (Wednesday, 11 April)
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Sylvain Eliade (Wednesday, 11 April)
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Bruce Boughton (Wednesday, 11 April)
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Zdenko Vujasinović (Wednesday, 11 April)
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Arthur Jennings (Wednesday, 11 April)
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Mike Schinkel (Thursday, 12 April)
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Joe D'Andrea (Thursday, 12 April)
RE: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 mikko.honkala@nokia.com (Wednesday, 11 April)
RE: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 mikko.honkala@nokia.com (Friday, 13 April)
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Dan Connolly (Wednesday, 18 April)
specification name [was: Proposal to Adopt HTML5] Dailey, David P. (Thursday, 19 April)
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 James Graham (Wednesday, 18 April)
rel=noreferrer Robert Accettura (Sunday, 8 April)
Re: Mandated Video Format (was: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group) Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo (Thursday, 5 April)
RE: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group Chris Wilson (Thursday, 5 April)
Re: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group Matthew Raymond (Wednesday, 11 April)
RE:Re: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group Espen Antonsen - 24SevenOffice (Thursday, 5 April)
Re: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group Dave Raggett (Friday, 6 April)
Re: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group Doug Schepers (Thursday, 5 April)
Re: Canvas (was: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group) Maciej Stachowiak (Friday, 6 April)
Re: Canvas Maciej Stachowiak (Friday, 6 April)
Re: Canvas Doug Schepers (Saturday, 7 April)
Canvas [was RE: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group] Dailey, David P. (Sunday, 8 April)
Why <video>? (was Re: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group) Maciej Stachowiak (Friday, 6 April)
Re: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group Matthew Raymond (Friday, 6 April)
Re: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group Olivier GENDRIN (Thursday, 5 April)
Re: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group Doug Schepers (Thursday, 5 April)
HTML5 vs HTML6 Giovanni Gentili (Tuesday, 3 April)
- Re: HTML5 vs HTML6 paul haine (Tuesday, 3 April)
- HTML5 vs HTML6 T.V Raman (Tuesday, 3 April)
- Re: HTML5 vs HTML6 Brad Fults (Wednesday, 4 April)
- Re: HTML5 vs HTML6 Chris Wilson (Wednesday, 4 April)
- Version information (was Re: HTML5 vs HTML6) L. David Baron (Friday, 6 April)
- RE: Version information (was Re: HTML5 vs HTML6) Chris Wilson (Friday, 6 April)
- Re: Version information Anne van Kesteren (Friday, 6 April)
- RE: Version information Chris Wilson (Friday, 6 April)
- Re: Version information Maciej Stachowiak (Friday, 6 April)
- RE: Version information Chris Wilson (Friday, 6 April)
- RE: Version information Ian Hickson (Friday, 6 April)
- Re: Version information Maciej Stachowiak (Friday, 6 April)
- Re: Version information Boris Zbarsky (Saturday, 7 April)
- RE: Version information Håkon Wium Lie (Saturday, 7 April)
- Re: Version information Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo (Saturday, 7 April)
- RE: Version information Chris Wilson (Saturday, 7 April)
- Re: Version information Dao Gottwald (Saturday, 7 April)
- Re: Version information Michael A. Puls II (Saturday, 7 April)
- Re: Version information Lachlan Hunt (Saturday, 7 April)
- Re: Version information Dao Gottwald (Sunday, 8 April)
- RE: Version information Chris Wilson (Monday, 9 April)
- RE: Version information Chris Wilson (Monday, 9 April)
- Intent to Conform (was Re: Version information) Maciej Stachowiak (Monday, 9 April)
- RE: Intent to Conform (was Re: Version information) Chris Wilson (Monday, 9 April)
- Re: Intent to Conform (was Re: Version information) Maciej Stachowiak (Monday, 9 April)
- Re: Intent to Conform (was Re: Version information) Laurens Holst (Thursday, 12 April)
- RE: Intent to Conform (was Re: Version information) Chris Wilson (Thursday, 12 April)
- Re: Intent to Conform (was Re: Version information) Maciej Stachowiak (Thursday, 12 April)
- RE: Intent to Conform (was Re: Version information) Chris Wilson (Thursday, 12 April)
- Re: Intent to Conform (was Re: Version information) L. David Baron (Thursday, 12 April)
- RE: Intent to Conform (was Re: Version information) Chris Wilson (Friday, 13 April)
- Re: Intent to Conform (was Re: Version information) Boris Zbarsky (Thursday, 12 April)
- Re: Intent to Conform (was Re: Version information) Maciej Stachowiak (Thursday, 12 April)
- Re: Version information Henrik Dvergsdal (Thursday, 12 April)
- Re: Version information David Håsäther (Thursday, 12 April)
- Re: Version information Henrik Dvergsdal (Thursday, 12 April)
- Re: Version information Ian Hickson (Thursday, 12 April)
- Re: Version information Henrik Dvergsdal (Thursday, 12 April)
- Re: Version information ryan (Thursday, 12 April)
- Re: Version information Ian Hickson (Thursday, 12 April)
- Deviance from SGML (was Re: Version information) Henrik Dvergsdal (Thursday, 12 April)
- Re: Deviance from SGML (was Re: Version information) Ian Hickson (Thursday, 12 April)
- Re: Version information Murray Maloney (Friday, 13 April)
- Re: Version information Lachlan Hunt (Friday, 13 April)
- Re: Version information Simon Pieters (Thursday, 12 April)
- Re: Version information Eric Daspet (Thursday, 12 April)
- Re: Version information Ian Hickson (Thursday, 12 April)
- Re: Version information Mike Schinkel (Saturday, 14 April)
- Re: Version information Murray Maloney (Saturday, 14 April)
- Re: Version information David Håsäther (Saturday, 14 April)
- Re: Version information Dan Connolly (Saturday, 14 April)
- Re: Version information David Håsäther (Thursday, 12 April)
- Re: Version information Simon Pieters (Thursday, 12 April)
- Re: Version information Henrik Dvergsdal (Thursday, 12 April)
- Re: Version information Simon Pieters (Thursday, 12 April)
- Re: Version information Lachlan Hunt (Friday, 13 April)
- Re: Version information Henrik Dvergsdal (Friday, 13 April)
- Re: Version information Henri Sivonen (Friday, 13 April)
- Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henrik Dvergsdal (Friday, 13 April)
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Ian Hickson (Friday, 13 April)
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henrik Dvergsdal (Friday, 13 April)
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henri Sivonen (Friday, 13 April)
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henrik Dvergsdal (Friday, 13 April)
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henri Sivonen (Saturday, 14 April)
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Anne van Kesteren (Friday, 13 April)
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Ian Hickson (Friday, 13 April)
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henrik Dvergsdal (Friday, 13 April)
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Ian Hickson (Friday, 13 April)
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henrik Dvergsdal (Saturday, 14 April)
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henri Sivonen (Saturday, 14 April)
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henrik Dvergsdal (Saturday, 14 April)
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henri Sivonen (Sunday, 15 April)
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henrik Dvergsdal (Sunday, 15 April)
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henri Sivonen (Sunday, 15 April)
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Bruce Boughton (Sunday, 15 April)
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henri Sivonen (Sunday, 15 April)
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henri Sivonen (Sunday, 15 April)
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Bruce Boughton (Sunday, 15 April)
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henri Sivonen (Sunday, 15 April)
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henrik Dvergsdal (Sunday, 15 April)
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henri Sivonen (Sunday, 15 April)
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henrik Dvergsdal (Sunday, 15 April)
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Daniel Glazman (Monday, 23 April)
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Dão Gottwald (Monday, 23 April)
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Daniel Glazman (Monday, 23 April)
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Dão Gottwald (Monday, 23 April)
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Ian Hickson (Monday, 16 April)
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henrik Dvergsdal (Monday, 16 April)
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Julian Reschke (Monday, 16 April)
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) James Graham (Monday, 16 April)
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Dan Connolly (Monday, 16 April)
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henri Sivonen (Monday, 16 April)
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henrik Dvergsdal (Tuesday, 17 April)
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Daniel Glazman (Monday, 23 April)
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Ian Hickson (Monday, 16 April)
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Dão Gottwald (Monday, 16 April)
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Ian Hickson (Monday, 16 April)
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Dão Gottwald (Tuesday, 17 April)
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) David Dailey (Tuesday, 17 April)
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) James Graham (Tuesday, 17 April)
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) liorean (Tuesday, 17 April)
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Dão Gottwald (Tuesday, 17 April)
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) James Graham (Tuesday, 17 April)
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Boris Zbarsky (Tuesday, 17 April)
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Dão Gottwald (Tuesday, 17 April)
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Boris Zbarsky (Tuesday, 17 April)
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Dão Gottwald (Tuesday, 17 April)
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) liorean (Tuesday, 17 April)
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henri Sivonen (Tuesday, 17 April)
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Dão Gottwald (Tuesday, 17 April)
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henrik Dvergsdal (Tuesday, 17 April)
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Ian Hickson (Tuesday, 17 April)
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henrik Dvergsdal (Tuesday, 17 April)
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Ian Hickson (Tuesday, 17 April)
- Perception of HTML5 (was Re: Formal definition of HTML5) Henrik Dvergsdal (Tuesday, 17 April)
- Re: Perception of HTML5 (was Re: Formal definition of HTML5) Maciej Stachowiak (Tuesday, 17 April)
- Re: Perception of HTML5 (was Re: Formal definition of HTML5) Henrik Dvergsdal (Tuesday, 17 April)
- Re: Perception of HTML5 (was Re: Formal definition of HTML5) Marcos Caceres (Tuesday, 17 April)
- Re: Perception of HTML5 (was Re: Formal definition of HTML5) Henrik Dvergsdal (Wednesday, 18 April)
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henri Sivonen (Tuesday, 17 April)
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henrik Dvergsdal (Monday, 16 April)
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Ian Hickson (Monday, 16 April)
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 Terje Bless (Monday, 16 April)
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henrik Dvergsdal (Tuesday, 17 April)
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Ian Hickson (Tuesday, 17 April)
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Dannii (Tuesday, 17 April)
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Karl Dubost (Wednesday, 18 April)
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Mike Schinkel (Saturday, 14 April)
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henri Sivonen (Saturday, 14 April)
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Anne van Kesteren (Friday, 13 April)
- RE: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Chris Wilson (Friday, 13 April)
- RE: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Ian Hickson (Friday, 13 April)
- RE: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Chris Wilson (Sunday, 15 April)
- RE: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Ian Hickson (Sunday, 15 April)
- RE: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) T.V Raman (Monday, 16 April)
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Doug Schepers (Monday, 16 April)
- RE: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Chris Wilson (Monday, 16 April)
- RE: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) T.V Raman (Monday, 16 April)
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Jeff Cutsinger (Monday, 16 April)
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Maciej Stachowiak (Monday, 16 April)
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) David Dailey (Monday, 16 April)
- RE: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Ian Hickson (Monday, 16 April)
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Daniel Glazman (Monday, 23 April)
- Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering Murray Maloney (Monday, 16 April)
- Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering Maciej Stachowiak (Monday, 16 April)
- Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering Murray Maloney (Monday, 16 April)
- Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering David Hyatt (Monday, 16 April)
- Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering Murray Maloney (Monday, 16 April)
- Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering T.V Raman (Monday, 16 April)
- Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering David Hyatt (Monday, 16 April)
- Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering T.V Raman (Tuesday, 17 April)
- Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering Karl Dubost (Wednesday, 18 April)
- Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering Anne van Kesteren (Wednesday, 18 April)
- Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering Simon Pieters (Wednesday, 18 April)
- Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering Magnus Kristiansen (Wednesday, 18 April)
- Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 18 April)
- Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering Anne van Kesteren (Thursday, 19 April)
- Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering Julian Reschke (Thursday, 19 April)
- RE: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering Chris Wilson (Thursday, 19 April)
- Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering Charles McCathieNevile (Thursday, 19 April)
- Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering Mike Schinkel (Saturday, 28 April)
- Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering Maciej Stachowiak (Monday, 16 April)
- Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering Murray Maloney (Monday, 16 April)
- Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering Bruce Boughton (Monday, 16 April)
- Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering Maciej Stachowiak (Monday, 16 April)
- Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering Sander Tekelenburg (Wednesday, 18 April)
- Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering David Hyatt (Monday, 16 April)
- Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering Murray Maloney (Monday, 16 April)
- Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering Dailey, David P. (Wednesday, 18 April)
- Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering liorean (Wednesday, 18 April)
- RE: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Dailey, David P. (Sunday, 15 April)
- RE: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Philip Taylor (Sunday, 15 April)
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Joe D'Andrea (Monday, 16 April)
- Precision of <canvas> rendering (was: Re: Formal definition of HTML5) Henri Sivonen (Tuesday, 17 April)
- Re: Precision of <canvas> rendering (was: Re: Formal definition of HTML5) David Hyatt (Tuesday, 17 April)
- RE: Precision of <canvas> rendering (was: Re: Formal definition of HTML5) Dailey, David P. (Wednesday, 18 April)
- Re: Precision of <canvas> rendering (was: Re: Formal definition of HTML5) Henri Sivonen (Wednesday, 18 April)
- Re: Precision of <canvas> rendering (was: Re: Formal definition of HTML5) David Dailey (Wednesday, 18 April)
- RE: Precision of <canvas> rendering (was: Re: Formal definition of HTML5) Chris Wilson (Wednesday, 18 April)
- Re: Precision of <canvas> rendering (was: Re: Formal definition of HTML5) Henri Sivonen (Wednesday, 18 April)
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Sean Fraser (Thursday, 19 April)
- RE: Intent to Conform (was Re: Version information) Chris Wilson (Thursday, 12 April)
- Re: Version information Henrik Dvergsdal (Monday, 9 April)
- Re: Version information Anne van Kesteren (Monday, 9 April)
- Re: Version information Henrik Dvergsdal (Monday, 9 April)
- Re: Version information Anne van Kesteren (Monday, 9 April)
- Re: Version information M. Jackson Wilkinson (Monday, 9 April)
- RE: Version information Ian Hickson (Friday, 6 April)
- Re: Version information Elliott Sprehn (Friday, 6 April)
- RE: Version information Chris Wilson (Friday, 6 April)
- Re: Version information Ian Hickson (Saturday, 7 April)
- Re: Version information L. David Baron (Saturday, 7 April)
- Re: Version information Laurens Holst (Saturday, 7 April)
- Re: Version information Lachlan Hunt (Saturday, 7 April)
- Re: Version information Anne van Kesteren (Saturday, 7 April)
- RE: Version information Chris Wilson (Monday, 9 April)
- Re: Version information Magnus Kristiansen (Monday, 9 April)
- RE: Version information Ian Hickson (Monday, 9 April)
Re: HTML5 vs HTML6 Olivier GENDRIN (Wednesday, 4 April)
RE: semantics [was Re: Proposed Design Principles updated] Chris Wilson (Thursday, 5 April)
Re: Proposed Design Principles updated T.V Raman (Tuesday, 3 April)
Re: Proposed Design Principles updated Maciej Stachowiak (Wednesday, 4 April)
style.background rendering - browser inconsistency David Dailey (Tuesday, 3 April)
Re: Proposed Design Principles updated Karl Dubost (Wednesday, 4 April)
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Mike Schinkel (Saturday, 14 April)
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Dao Gottwald (Thursday, 12 April)
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Mike Schinkel (Saturday, 14 April)
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Mike Schinkel (Thursday, 12 April)
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Mike Schinkel (Saturday, 14 April)
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Alexander Graf (Monday, 9 April)
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Alexander Graf (Monday, 9 April)
innerHTML and setTimeout David Dailey (Monday, 9 April)
Re: innerHTML and setTimeout Lachlan Hunt (Monday, 9 April)
Re: innerHTML and setTimeout Schalk Neethling (Monday, 9 April)
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Mike Schinkel (Saturday, 14 April)
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Mike Schinkel (Saturday, 14 April)
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis (Saturday, 14 April)
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis (Saturday, 14 April)
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis (Sunday, 15 April)
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis (Sunday, 15 April)
usability testing [was: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>] David Dailey (Monday, 16 April)
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis (Sunday, 15 April)
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis (Sunday, 15 April)
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis (Monday, 16 April)
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis (Tuesday, 17 April)
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> David Dailey (Friday, 20 April)
Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML Dao Gottwald (Wednesday, 4 April)
Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML Olivier GENDRIN (Wednesday, 4 April)
Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q L. David Baron (Monday, 2 April)
Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q Alexander Graf (Tuesday, 3 April)
Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q Henri Sivonen (Monday, 2 April)
Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q Olivier GENDRIN (Thursday, 5 April)
Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis (Thursday, 12 April)
Re: Let every element have a src attribute Elliott Sprehn (Monday, 2 April)
Re: Let every element have a src attribute Matthew Raymond (Wednesday, 4 April)
Re: Let every element have a src attribute Jeff Schiller (Wednesday, 4 April)
- Re: Default (informal) Style Sheet Lachlan Hunt (Sunday, 1 April)
- Re: Default (informal) Style Sheet Asbjørn Ulsberg (Sunday, 1 April)
- Re: Default (informal) Style Sheet Murray Maloney (Sunday, 1 April)
- Re: Default (informal) Style Sheet Mike Schinkel (Monday, 2 April)
- The HTMLWG and WHATWG (Was: Default (informal) Style Sheet) Ian Hickson (Monday, 2 April)
- Re: The HTMLWG and WHATWG (Was: Default (informal) Style Sheet) Mike Schinkel (Monday, 2 April)
- Re: The HTMLWG and WHATWG (Was: Default (informal) Style Sheet) Ian Hickson (Monday, 2 April)
- Re: The HTMLWG and WHATWG (Was: Default (informal) Style Sheet) Mike Schinkel (Monday, 2 April)
- Re: The HTMLWG and WHATWG (Was: Default (informal) Style Sheet) Ian Hickson (Monday, 2 April)
- Re: The HTMLWG and WHATWG (Was: Default (informal) Style Sheet) Murray Maloney (Monday, 2 April)
- Re: The HTMLWG and WHATWG (Was: Default (informal) Style Sheet) Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer (Tuesday, 3 April)
- Re: The HTMLWG and WHATWG (Was: Default (informal) Style Sheet) Ian Hickson (Tuesday, 3 April)
- Re: The HTMLWG and WHATWG (Was: Default (informal) Style Sheet) Sierk Bornemann (Thursday, 5 April)
- RE: The HTMLWG and WHATWG (Was: Default (informal) Style Sheet) Chris Wilson (Thursday, 5 April)
- Re: The HTMLWG and WHATWG (Was: Default (informal) Style Sheet) Henri Sivonen (Thursday, 5 April)
- RE: The HTMLWG and WHATWG (Was: Default (informal) Style Sheet) Chris Wilson (Thursday, 5 April)
- Re: The HTMLWG and WHATWG (Was: Default (informal) Style Sheet) Henri Sivonen (Thursday, 5 April)
- Re: The HTMLWG and WHATWG (Was: Default (informal) Style Sheet) Mike Schinkel (Monday, 9 April)
- Re: The HTMLWG and WHATWG Doug Schepers (Wednesday, 4 April)
- Re: The HTMLWG and WHATWG Ian Hickson (Wednesday, 4 April)
- Re: The HTMLWG and WHATWG (Was: Default (informal) Style Sheet) Daniel Glazman (Monday, 2 April)
RE: [whatwg] Default (informal) Style Sheet Kempen, E.J.F. van (Sunday, 1 April)
Re: [whatwg] Default (informal) Style Sheet Sander Tekelenburg (Sunday, 1 April)
Last message date: Monday, 30 April 2007 23:57:52 UTC