- From: Alexander Graf <a.graf@aetherworld.org>
- Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 00:52:18 +0200
- To: "Preston L. Bannister" <preston@bannister.us>
- Cc: "Dailey, David P." <david.dailey@sru.edu>, public-html@w3.org
Received on Sunday, 15 April 2007 22:53:43 UTC
> After writing the above, I would like to suggest another principle: > The HTML-next specification should be as short as possible. > > Strictly speaking, "Don't Break the Web" is a non-issue. Existing > web pages will be interpreted just as they are today. The HTML- > next specification only applies when the HTML-next version > specifier is seen by the browser. (Just like XHTML did so [cough] > successfully.) +1 I couldn't agree more. I don't really see any possible and at the same time sensible alternative.
Received on Sunday, 15 April 2007 22:53:43 UTC