- From: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>
- Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 11:13:36 +0200
- To: Chris Wilson <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
Also sprach Chris Wilson:
> >Authors want consistency across implementations more than they want an
> >ideal spec that isn't implemented anywhere.
>
> I'd think we could give them a third option - an ideal spec that
> all implementations converge on.
It seems, though, that you are advocating a model where spec work is
restarted once >0.5% of the content starts referring to the ideal
spec?
AnneVK asked you a question about this:
| Hi Chris,
|
| Do I understand it correctly that the following is your proposal for HTML
| versioning:
|
| 1. Microsoft implements HTML5.
| 2. Microsoft ships an IE release which triggers "HTML5-mode"
| when a page uses <!doctype html5>.
| 3. Microsoft fixes bugs.
| 4. When more than 0.5% of the content out there uses
| <!doctype html5> Microsoft stops fixing bugs.
| 5. Back to step one incrementing the HTML version number by one.
|
| (Instead of <!doctype html5> some other identifier could have been used of
| course, such as the suggested <!doctype html> or <!doctype html><html
| version=5>, etc.)
It would be helpful if you could comment on this. How many levels and
years do you think it will take before all implementations reach the
ideal goal?
-h&kon
Håkon Wium Lie CTO °þe®ª
howcome@opera.com http://people.opera.com/howcome
Received on Sunday, 15 April 2007 09:13:58 UTC