On Apr 22, 2007, at 12:50 AM, Brad Fults wrote: > >> > I wish I had someone to nominate, but I'm afraid I don't. I'm >> > curious how palatable to the other browser vendors an editor from >> > Microsoft would be? Not very, I suspect... >> >> Since one of the co-chairs is a Microsoft employee, I don't think >> they particularly need any more representation or influence. > > I really don't agree with the anti-Microsoft sentiment here or on any > other topic discussed in this WG. I would have no problem having one > of the editors be from Microsoft, assuming that Microsoft has joined > this group in good faith and that our editors will perform as Karl > Dubost described [1]. To be clear, I don't think it would be a good idea to have a co-chair and a co-editor representing the same company regardless what that company is. Also, I believe this suggestion was made with a thought to better represent the Microsoft point of view, and I think it is well-enough represented. Regards, MaciejReceived on Sunday, 22 April 2007 10:01:05 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:44:09 UTC