public-html@w3.org from April 2007: by date

Monday, 30 April 2007
- Re: <font> (was Support Existing Content) Sander Tekelenburg
- Re: Support Existing Content Philip & Le Khanh
- Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review) David Hyatt
- Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review) David Hyatt
- Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review) Tina Holmboe
- Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review) Tina Holmboe
- Re: [suggestion] Allow DIV inside any element Dão Gottwald
- Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review) David Hyatt
- Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal John Boyer
- Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal John Boyer
- Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review) Tina Holmboe
- Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal John Boyer
- Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much? John Boyer
- Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review) Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: Introduce <term> element Olivier GENDRIN
- Re: How to refer to place of document, which is not marked by author!? Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review) David Hyatt
- Re: [suggestion] Allow DIV inside any element Maurice
- Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review) Tina Holmboe
- Re: [suggestion] Allow DIV inside any element M. Jackson Wilkinson
- Re: [suggestion] Allow DIV inside any element Maurice
- Re: Allow DIV inside any element Maurice
- Re: [suggestion] Allow DIV inside any element Maurice
- Re: [suggestion] Allow DIV inside any element Maurice
- Re: How to refer to place of document, which is not marked by author!? Arthur Jennings
- Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal Maurice
- Re: [suggestion] Allow DIV inside any element Schalk Neethling
- Re: Pandering to poor authorship Maurice
- Re: Introduce <term> element Maurice
- Re: Versioning and the end user Maurice
- Re: missing principle Maurice
- Re: Hand-coding HTML (was: New html-element: table3) Maurice
- Re: Semantic vs. Presentational (was Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>) Maurice
- Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Maurice
- Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review) Gareth Hay
- Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review) Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review) Elliott Sprehn
- Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review) David Dailey
- Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review) James Graham
- Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review) James Graham
- Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review) Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
- Re: Meta-question : why so few "Re: " subjects ? Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
- Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review) Murray Maloney
- Re: Meta-question : why so few "Re: " subjects ? Anne van Kesteren
- Meta-question : why so few "Re: " subjects ? Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
- Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review) Gareth Hay
- Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review) Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much? Simon Pieters
- Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review) Murray Maloney
- Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much? Simon Pieters
- Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much? Dave Raggett
- Re: Desing principles - Support World Languages example added David Dailey
- Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much? Anne van Kesteren
- Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much? Mark Birbeck
- Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much? Mark Birbeck
- Re: Desing principles - Support World Languages example added Jirka Kosek
- Re: [suggestion] Allow DIV inside any element Cameron McCormack
- Re: [suggestion] Allow DIV inside any element Dão Gottwald
Sunday, 29 April 2007
- Re: [suggestion] Allow DIV inside any element Andrew Stibbard
Monday, 30 April 2007
- Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much? Dave Raggett
- Re: Desing principles - Support World Languages example added Anne van Kesteren
- Re: HTML version issue summary? Dão Gottwald
- Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much? Simon Pieters
- Re: HTML version issue summary? Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: HTML version issue summary? Karl Dubost
- Re: HTML version issue summary? Karl Dubost
- Re: survey of top web sites Benjamin West
- Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much? Matthew Raymond
- Re: survey of top web sites Karl Dubost
Sunday, 29 April 2007
- RE: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review) Dailey, David P.
- Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review) Karl Dubost
- Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review) Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: [suggestion] Allow DIV inside any element Kornel Lesinski
- Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much? Mark Birbeck
- Re: [suggestion] Allow DIV inside any element Schalk Neethling
- Re: HTML version issue summary? Matthew Ratzloff
- Re: [suggestion] Allow DIV inside any element Bruce Lawson
- Re: Allow DIV inside any element Olivier GENDRIN
- Re: task list Schalk Neethling
- Re: [suggestion] Allow DIV inside any element Elliott Sprehn
- Re: task list David Dailey
- Re: Allow DIV inside any element Mallory Mollo
- Re: [suggestion] Allow DIV inside any element Daniel Glazman
- [suggestion] Allow DIV inside any element Marat Tanalin
- Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal Doug Schepers
- Re: Desing principles - Support World Languages example added Jirka Kosek
- Re: Introduce <term> element Olivier GENDRIN
- Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review) Murray Maloney
- Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review) Murray Maloney
- Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal Matthew Raymond
- Re: Desing principles - Support World Languages example added Anne van Kesteren
- Re: Desing principles - Support World Languages example added Jirka Kosek
- Re: Desing principles - Support World Languages example added Jirka Kosek
- Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal Daniel Glazman
- Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: HTML version issue summary? Dannii
- Re: HTML version issue summary? Preston L. Bannister
- Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal Doug Schepers
- Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal Preston L. Bannister
- Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal John Boyer
Saturday, 28 April 2007
- Re: HTML version issue summary? Matthew Ratzloff
Sunday, 29 April 2007
- Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal John Boyer
- Another look at the Proposed Design Principles Dailey, David P.
- Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal Daniel Glazman
- Re: Hand-coding HTML Daniel Glazman
- Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal John Boyer
- Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal Maciej Stachowiak
Saturday, 28 April 2007
- Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review) Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review) Håkon Wium Lie
- Re: missing principle Preston L. Bannister
- Re: Hand-coding HTML (was: New html-element: table3) Patrick Taylor
- Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal John Boyer
- Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review) Murray Maloney
- Re: Hand-coding HTML (was: New html-element: table3) Dylan Smith
- Re: Pandering to poor authorship Sander Tekelenburg
- Re: HTML version issue summary? Preston L. Bannister
- Re: Versioning and the end user Matthew Ratzloff
- Desing principles - Support World Languages example added Laurens Holst
- Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review) Preston L. Bannister
- Re: Proposed Design Principles review Murray Maloney
- Re: Proposed Design Principles review Murray Maloney
- Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: missing principle Smylers
- Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer
- Re: missing principle Smylers
- Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal Dave Raggett
- Re: missing principle Maciej Stachowiak
- task list Schalk Neethling
- Re: How to refer to place of document, which is not marked by author!? Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal Anne van Kesteren
- Re: missing principle Mike Schinkel
- Re: How to refer to place of document, which is not marked by author!? Mike Schinkel
- Re: Introduce <term> element Mike Schinkel
- Re: missing principle Anne van Kesteren
- Re: Versioning and the end user Mike Schinkel
- Re: missing principle Mike Schinkel
- Re: missing principle bhopgood@brookes.ac.uk
- Hand-coding HTML (was: New html-element: table3) Mike Schinkel
- Re: Pandering to poor authorship (was Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>) Mike Schinkel
- Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review) Roger Johansson
- Re: Proposed Design Principles updated Mike Schinkel
- Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review) Roger Johansson
- Re: How to refer to place of document, which is not marked by author!? Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering Mike Schinkel
- Re: How to refer to place of document, which is not marked by author!? Mike Schinkel
- Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal Mike Schinkel
- Semantic vs. Presentational (was Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>) Mike Schinkel
- Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Mike Schinkel
- Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Mike Schinkel
- Re: missing principle (small) Dylan Smith
- Re: Proposed Design Principles review Dylan Smith
Friday, 27 April 2007
- Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal Matthew Raymond
- RE: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt Chris Wilson
- Re: Proposed requirement: specification should provide enough detail to handle Web content Dailey, David P.
- Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review) Brad Fults
- Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review) Stephen Stewart
- Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt John Boyer
- Re: Support Existing Content Elliott Sprehn
- Re: [public-html] <none> Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much? Mark Birbeck
- Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much? Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: Support Existing Content Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: Proposed requirement: specification should provide enough detail to handle Web content Ian Hickson
- HTML5 as our specification text for review? (formal question WBS survey) Dan Connolly
- Re: missing principle Daniel Glazman
- Re: missing principle Dan Connolly
- Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review) Roger Johansson
- Re: missing principle bhopgood@brookes.ac.uk
- Re: Proposed Design Principles review Debi Orton
- Re: Proposed requirement: specification should provide enough detail to handle Web content Dan Connolly
- Re: [public-html] <none> Gareth Hay
- Re: [public-html] <none> Gareth Hay
- Re: [public-html] <none> Smylers
- Re: [public-html] <none> Jeff Cutsinger
- Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much? bhopgood@brookes.ac.uk
- Re: Support Existing Content Gareth Hay
- Re: [public-html] <none> Smylers
- Re: Support Existing Content Henri Sivonen
- Re: [public-html] <none> Gareth Hay
- Re: [public-html] <none> Denis Boudreau (WebConforme)
- Re: [public-html] <none> Jeff Cutsinger
- Re: Proposed Design Principles review Maurice
- Re: [public-html] <none> Maurice
- [public-html] <none> Gareth Hay
- Re: Support Existing Content Lachlan Hunt
- Re: Support Existing Content Smylers
- Re: Support Existing Content Gareth Hay
- Re: Support Existing Content Lachlan Hunt
- Re: survey of top web sites Sander Tekelenburg
- Re: Support Existing Content Jonas Sicking
- Re: missing principle Smylers
- Re: missing principle Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: missing principle Daniel Glazman
- Re: missing principle Karl Dubost
- Re: missing principle Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal Dave Raggett
- missing principle Daniel Glazman
- Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review) Doug Schepers
- Design Principles Update Maciej Stachowiak
- Proposed requirement: specification should provide enough detail to handle Web content L. David Baron
- Re: Proposed Design Principles review Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal -- from a proposed design principles point of view Henri Sivonen
- Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much? Henri Sivonen
- Re: Proposed Design Principles review Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: Proposed Design Principles review Maciej Stachowiak
- Design principles: added three examples Anne van Kesteren
- Re: Proposed Design Principles review Lachlan Hunt
- Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal -- from a proposed design principles point of view Anne van Kesteren
- Re: Proposed Design Principles review Preston L. Bannister
- Re: Proposed Design Principles review Doug Schepers
- RE: About the Web Forms 2 proposal -- from a proposed design principles point of view Josh Sled
- Re: Proposed Design Principles review Preston L. Bannister
- Re: Proposed Design Principles review Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: Proposed Design Principles review Dannii
- Re: Proposed Design Principles review Doug Schepers
- RE: About the Web Forms 2 proposal -- from a proposed design principles point of view Dailey, David P.
- Re: Proposed Design Principles review Ian Hickson
- Re: Proposed Design Principles review Lachlan Hunt
- Re: Proposed Design Principles review Dannii
- Re: HTML version issue summary? Matthew Raymond
- Re: Proposed Design Principles review Karl Dubost
- Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal -- from a proposed design principles point of view Matthew Raymond
- Re: survey of top web sites Sean Fraser
- RE: survey of top web sites Dailey, David P.
- Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal Ian Hickson
- Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much? Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much? Mark Birbeck
- Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much? Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: survey of top web sites Sander Tekelenburg
- Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much? Mark Birbeck
- Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer
Thursday, 26 April 2007
- Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much? Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much? Mark Birbeck
- Re: survey of top web sites Sander Tekelenburg
- RE: HTML WG teleconference 2007-04-26 minutes for review Dailey, David P.
- RE: About the Web Forms 2 proposal -- from a proposed design principles point of view Dailey, David P.
- Re: Parsing of HTML fragments Maurice
- Re: HTML WG teleconference 2007-04-26 minutes for review Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: HTML WG teleconference 2007-04-26 minutes for review Dan Connolly
- HTML WG teleconference 2007-04-26 minutes for review T.V Raman
- Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much? Henri Sivonen
- Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much? Mark Birbeck
- Re: non-rectangular images & <img> tag Maurice
- Re: RE: survey of top web sites Sean Fraser
- Re: HTML WG teleconference 2007-04-26 minutes for review Henri Sivonen
- Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype Henri Sivonen
- RE: survey of top web sites Dan Connolly
- Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much? Henri Sivonen
- Re: Feature Strings Maurice
- Re: new form control Maurice
- HTML WG teleconference 2007-04-26 minutes for review Dan Connolly
- Re: Proposed Design Principles review Anne van Kesteren
- Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal Ian Hickson
- RE: survey of top web sites Dailey, David P.
- Re: Proposed Design Principles review Jeff Schiller
- RE: Proposed Design Principles review Dailey, David P.
- Re: Proposed Design Principles review Arthur Jennings
- Re: INPUT-PIC form control Thomas Broyer
- Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype Daniel Spång
- Re: survey of top web sites Nick Fitzsimons
- RE: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much? Dailey, David P.
- About the Web Forms 2 proposal Anne van Kesteren
- Proposed Design Principles review Ian Hickson
- Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much? Sander van Lambalgen
- Re: non-rectangular images & <img> tag Maurice
- HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much? Preston L. Bannister
- Re: survey of top web sites Sean Fraser
- Re: HTML version issue summary? Sander Tekelenburg
- scribe for today's teleconference? Dan Connolly
- Re: Let use this convention for conversation Dan Connolly
- Re: HTML version issue summary? Jeff Schiller
- Dublin workshop on web authoring Dave Raggett
- Re[2]: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: Re[2]: Fwd: Re[2]: New html-element: table3 Dmitry Turin
- Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: Re[2]: Fwd: Re[2]: New html-element: table3 Dmitry Turin
- Re: Separation of versioning concerns Asbjørn Ulsberg
- Re: Re[2]: Fwd: Re[2]: New html-element: table3 Thomas Broyer
- Re[2]: Fwd: Re[2]: New html-element: table3 Dmitry Turin
- Re: HTML version issue summary? Dão Gottwald
- Re: Fwd: Re[2]: New html-element: table3 Jonas Sicking
- Re[4]: New html-element: table3 Dmitry Turin
- Re[2]: Fwd: Re[2]: New html-element: table3 Dmitry Turin
- INPUT-PIC form control Dmitry Turin
- Re: Let use this convention for conversation Jonas Sicking
- Let use this convention for conversation Dmitry Turin
- Re: Fwd: Re[2]: New html-element: table3 Jonas Sicking
- Fwd: Re[2]: New html-element: table3 Dmitry Turin
- Fwd: Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: Re[2]: New html-element: table3 Dmitry Turin
- Fwd: Re[4]: New html-element: table3 Dmitry Turin
- Fwd: Re[2]: New html-element: table3 Dmitry Turin
- Re: How to refer to place of document, which is not marked by author!? Henri Sivonen
- How to refer to place of document, which is not marked by author!? Dmitry Turin
Wednesday, 25 April 2007
- Re: Separation of versioning concerns Maciej Stachowiak
Thursday, 26 April 2007
- Re: HTML version issue summary? Matthew Raymond
Wednesday, 25 April 2007
- Re: Separation of versioning concerns Scott Turner
- Re: Parsing of HTML fragments Scott Turner
- Re: new form control Kornel Lesinski
- Re: agenda: HTML WG teleconference 2007-04-26T17:00:00Z (invited participants) Dan Connolly
- Re: agenda: HTML WG teleconference 2007-04-26T17:00:00Z Dan Connolly
- Re: non-rectangular images & <img> tag Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: survey of top web sites Sean Fraser
- Re: survey of top web sites Benjamin West
- Re: Separation of versioning concerns Matthew Ratzloff
- Re: Parsing of HTML fragments James Graham
- Re: Parsing of HTML fragments Marco Von Ballmoos
- Re: HTML version issue summary? L. David Baron
- Re: agenda: HTML WG teleconference 2007-04-26T17:00:00Z Gregory J. Rosmaita
- Re: survey of top web sites David Dailey
- Re: HTML version issue summary? Sander Tekelenburg
- Re: HTML version issue summary? Sander Tekelenburg
- agenda: HTML WG teleconference 2007-04-26T17:00:00Z Dan Connolly
- Re: survey of top web sites Anne van Kesteren
- Re: non-rectangular images & <img> tag Jeff Schiller
- Re: Parsing of HTML fragments Asbjørn Ulsberg
- Re: non-rectangular images & <img> tag David Dailey
- Re: survey of top web sites David Dailey
- Re: non-rectangular images & <img> tag Asbjørn Ulsberg
- Re: Versioning of HTML fragments Asbjørn Ulsberg
- Re: Versioning of HTML fragments Asbjørn Ulsberg
- Re: Separation of versioning concerns Sam Ruby
- Re: Separation of versioning concerns Thomas Broyer
- Re: Separation of versioning concerns James Graham
- Re: Separation of versioning concerns Eric Daspet
- Re: HTML version issue summary? Jeff Schiller
- Re: Separation of versioning concerns Henri Sivonen
- Re: Separation of versioning concerns Dannii
- Separation of versioning concerns Sam Ruby
- Re: HTML version issue summary? Dão Gottwald
- Re: HTML version issue summary? Matthew Raymond
- Re: HTML version issue summary? Matthew Raymond
- Re: HTML version issue summary? Dão Gottwald
- Re: non-rectangular images & <img> tag Olivier GENDRIN
- Re: HTML version issue summary? L. David Baron
- Re: non-rectangular images & <img> tag Josef Spillner
- Re: HTML version issue summary? David Hyatt
- Re: HTML version issue summary? Jeff Schiller
- Re: survey of top web sites Sean Fraser
- Re: HTML version issue summary? David Hyatt
- Re: tasks to supplement HTML specification development Simon Pieters
- Re: HTML version issue summary? Matthew Raymond
- Re: HTML version issue summary? Chasen Le Hara
- Re: survey of top web sites Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: Re: survey of top web sites Sean Fraser
- Re: HTML version issue summary? David Hyatt
- Re: HTML version issue summary? David Hyatt
- Re: HTML version issue summary? Chasen Le Hara
- Re: survey of top web sites Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: HTML version issue summary? Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: survey of top web sites Sean Fraser
- Re: HTML version issue summary? Jonas Sicking
- Re: HTML version issue summary? Dão Gottwald
- Re: HTML version issue summary? Dannii
- Re: HTML version issue summary? Dão Gottwald
- Re: HTML version issue summary? David Hyatt
- Re: HTML version issue summary? Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: HTML version issue summary? Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: HTML version issue summary? David Hyatt
- Re: HTML version issue summary? David Hyatt
- Re: HTML version issue summary? Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: Parsing of HTML fragments Dão Gottwald
- Re: HTML version issue summary? David Hyatt
- Re: Parsing of HTML fragments Edward O'Connor
- Re: Parsing of HTML fragments Edward O'Connor
Tuesday, 24 April 2007
- Re: non-rectangular images & <img> tag Matthew Raymond
- Re: Parsing of HTML fragments Preston L. Bannister
- Re: Parsing of HTML fragments Ian Hickson
- HTML version issue summary? Dan Connolly
- Re: FAQ on joining the HTML WG as an Invited Expert Dan Connolly
- survey of top web sites Dan Connolly
- Re: Other roles we should fill (survey on tasks and roles) Dan Connolly
- Re: Parsing of HTML fragments Dão Gottwald
- Re: Parsing of HTML fragments Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: Parsing of HTML fragments Dão Gottwald
- Re: Parsing of HTML fragments Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: Parsing of HTML fragments Sam Ruby
- Re: Parsing of HTML fragments Edward O'Connor
- Parsing of HTML fragments Geoffrey Sneddon
- Re: Versioning of HTML fragments Marco Von Ballmoos
- Re: Re[2]: New html-element: table3 Thomas Broyer
- Re: FAQ on joining the HTML WG as an Invited Expert David Dailey
- Re: Re[2]: New html-element: table3 Preston L. Bannister
- Re: New html-element: table3 Preston L. Bannister
- Re: New html-element: table3 Jonas Sicking
- Re: new form control Matthew Ratzloff
- Re: brainstorm: attributes as virtual tags Dão Gottwald
- Re: brainstorm: attributes as virtual tags Dão Gottwald
- Re[4]: new form control Dmitry Turin
- FAQ on joining the HTML WG as an Invited Expert Dan Connolly
- brainstorm: attributes as virtual tags Dmitry Turin
- Re: non-rectangular images & <img> tag Olivier GENDRIN
- Re: new form control Rene Saarsoo
- Re[2]: New html-element: table3 Dmitry Turin
- Re: New html-element: table3 Henri Sivonen
- Re: BoF at XTech Anne van Kesteren
- Re: BoF at XTech Olivier GENDRIN
- New html-element: table3 Dmitry Turin
- New html-element: table3 Dmitry Turin
- Re: BoF at XTech James Graham
- Re: BoF at XTech James Graham
- Re: BoF at XTech Anne van Kesteren
Monday, 23 April 2007
- Versioning of HTML fragments Sam Ruby
Tuesday, 24 April 2007
- Re: BoF at XTech (was: Re: no HTML WG meeting around XTech) Karl Dubost
- Re: HTML WG teleconference Thu 26 Apr 1700UTC (meeting call, survey) Dan Connolly
- Re: HTML WG teleconference Thu 26 Apr 1700UTC (meeting call, survey) L. David Baron
Monday, 23 April 2007
- Re: Re[2]: new form control Kornel Lesinski
- Re: Now there is table-element with predetermined quantity of column.But sometimes we need to visualize three tables(for example, database tables) as one table:first table contains names of rows,second table contains names of columns (this table determine quantity of columns),third table contains data.New html-element: table-dim Jonas Sicking
- non-rectangular images & <img> tag Dailey, David P.
- BoF at XTech (was: Re: no HTML WG meeting around XTech) Henri Sivonen
- Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype Dan Connolly
- Re: HTML5 proposal response Ian Hickson
- Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt David Hyatt
- Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt David Hyatt
- Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt Dan Connolly
- Re: Now there is table-element with predetermined quantity of column. But sometimes we need to visualize three tables (for example, database tables) as one table: first table contains names of rows, second table contains names of columns (this table Dão Gottwald
- Re: Now there is table-element with predetermined quantity of column. But sometimes we need to visualize three tables (for example, database tables) as one table: first table contains names of rows, second table contains names of columns (this table Preston L. Bannister
- RE: HTML5 proposal response Chris Wilson
- Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt Jeff Schiller
- Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Denis Boudreau (WebConforme)
- Re: Issue Tracking Dão Gottwald
- Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt Schalk Neethling
- Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt Daniel Glazman
- Re: HTML5 proposal response Olivier GENDRIN
- Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt James Graham
- Re: HTML5 proposal response Daniel Glazman
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 (progress on recruiting editors) Daniel Glazman
- Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt David Dailey
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Dão Gottwald
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Daniel Glazman
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Daniel Glazman
- Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt Benjamin Chait
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Dão Gottwald
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Daniel Glazman
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Daniel Glazman
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Daniel Glazman
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Daniel Glazman
- Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Daniel Glazman
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Daniel Glazman
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Daniel Glazman
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Daniel Glazman
- Re: Feature Strings Bill Mason
- Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt paul haine
- Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt Maciej Stachowiak
- Now there is table-element with predetermined quantity of column. Dmitry Turin
- Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt Benjamin Chait
- Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt Doug Schepers
- Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt Matthew Raymond
- Re: Microsoft versioning proposal Matthew Raymond
- Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt Doug Schepers
- Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: Feature Strings Matthew Raymond
- Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt Matthew Raymond
- Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt Matthew Raymond
- Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt Dylan Smith
Sunday, 22 April 2007
- Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt Gregory J. Rosmaita
- Other roles we should fill Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
- Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt Doug Schepers
- Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt Elliott Sprehn
- Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt Dailey, David P.
- Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| Roger Johansson
- Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Preston L. Bannister
- Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt Doug Schepers
Saturday, 21 April 2007
- Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt Charles Ying
Sunday, 22 April 2007
- Re: Microsoft versioning proposal Preston L. Bannister
- Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt Jeff Schiller
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| Matthew Raymond
Saturday, 21 April 2007
- Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Dão Gottwald
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| Kornel Lesinski
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| Terje Bless
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| Matthew Raymond
- Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt Denis Boudreau (WebConforme)
- Re: tasks to supplement HTML specification development Brad Fults
- Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate liorean
- Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt Patrick Taylor
- Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Dão Gottwald
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| Dão Gottwald
- Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Matthew Raymond
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| Terje Bless
- Re: Introduce <term> element Laurens Holst
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| Matthew Raymond
- RE: The argument for |bugmode| Sander Tekelenburg
- Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt Arthur Jennings
- Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt Matthew Raymond
- Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt Maciej Stachowiak
- Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt Maciej Stachowiak
Friday, 20 April 2007
- RE: The argument for |bugmode| Chris Wilson
- RE: The argument for |bugmode| Chris Wilson
- Re: new form control Kornel Lesinski
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| Matthew Ratzloff
- Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> David Dailey
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| Terje Bless
- Re: tasks to supplement HTML specification development Bill Mason
- Re: Editor and authors James Graham
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| Terje Bless
- Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Alexander Graf
- Re: Editor and authors Terje Bless
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| Henri Sivonen
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Lachlan Hunt
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| Patrick Taylor
- Update on affiliation Alexander Graf
- Re: new form control Dão Gottwald
- Re: new form control Dão Gottwald
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Matthew Raymond
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| Matthew Raymond
- new form control Dmitry Turin
- Re: Editor and authors Dão Gottwald
- Re: Editor and authors Henri Sivonen
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| Henri Sivonen
- Re: Editor and authors Henrik Dvergsdal
- Re: Feature Strings Smylers
- Editor and authors Re: HTML5 proposal response Karl Dubost
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Lachlan Hunt
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Lachlan Hunt
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| Terje Bless
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| Lachlan Hunt
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| Terje Bless
- Re: HTML5 proposal response Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| Matthew Ratzloff
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| Matthew Raymond
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| Matthew Raymond
- RE: HTML5 proposal response Dailey, David P.
Thursday, 19 April 2007
- Re: HTML5 proposal response Ian Hickson
- HTML5 proposal response Chris Wilson
- RE: The argument for |bugmode| Sander Tekelenburg
- RE: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 (progress on recruiting editors) Håkon Wium Lie
- Re: Feature Strings Jeff Schiller
- RE: The argument for |bugmode| Håkon Wium Lie
- Re: Feature Strings Ian Hickson
- RE: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 (progress on recruiting editors) Chris Wilson
- RE: The argument for |bugmode| Chris Wilson
- RE: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Chris Wilson
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Dão Gottwald
- RE: The argument for |bugmode| Chris Wilson
- RE: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering Chris Wilson
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Sander van Lambalgen
- Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Christian Schmidt
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 (progress on recruiting editors) bhopgood@brookes.ac.uk
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| Sander Tekelenburg
- Re: Feature Strings Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Geoffrey Sneddon
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo
- Re: Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Sean Fraser
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo
- Re: Feature Strings Jeff Schiller
- Feature Strings Jeff Schiller
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 (progress on recruiting editors) Brad Fults
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Magnus Kristiansen
- Re: Issue Tracking (was: Proposal to Adopt HTML5) Olivier GENDRIN
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Dão Gottwald
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo
- Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype Murray Maloney
- Re: Request for Decision: Design Principles Murray Maloney
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 (progress on recruiting editors) Håkon Wium Lie
- specification name [was: Proposal to Adopt HTML5] Dailey, David P.
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| Matthew Raymond
- Re: quality of authoring tools' output (was Versioning and html[5]) Dão Gottwald
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) James Graham
- Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering Julian Reschke
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| Sander Tekelenburg
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Patrick Taylor
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Henri Sivonen
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Lachlan Hunt
- Re: Eolas vs. <object> Laurens Holst
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Anne van Kesteren
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Karl Dubost
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 (progress on recruiting editors) Dan Connolly
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Dylan Smith
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 (progress on recruiting editors) Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 (progress on recruiting editors) Dan Connolly
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Lachlan Hunt
- RE: quality of authoring tools' output Sander Tekelenburg
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Sean Fraser
- Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering Charles McCathieNevile
- Re: Eolas vs. <object> Charles McCathieNevile
- Re: Microsoft versioning proposal Dannii
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| Lachlan Hunt
- Issue Tracking (was: Proposal to Adopt HTML5) Doug Schepers
- Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering Anne van Kesteren
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Lachlan Hunt
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Ian Hickson
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: quality of authoring tools' output (was Versioning and html[5]) Elliott Sprehn
Wednesday, 18 April 2007
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Olivier GENDRIN
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 (progress on recruiting editors) Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 (progress on recruiting editors) Dan Connolly
- Re: HTML WG teleconference Thu 26 Apr 1700UTC (meeting call, survey) Dan Connolly
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: HTML WG teleconference Thu 26 Apr 1700UTC (meeting call, survey) Ian Hickson
- Re: Request for Decision: Design Principles Doug Schepers
- RE: quality of authoring tools' output (was Versioning and html[5]) Dan Connolly
- supplemental HTML WG orientation teleconference (same survey) Dan Connolly
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 James Graham
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Dan Connolly
- RE: quality of authoring tools' output (was Versioning and html[5]) Sander Tekelenburg
- HTML WG teleconference Thu 26 Apr 1700UTC (meeting call, survey) Dan Connolly
- Re: Request for Decision: Design Principles Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: several messages on versioning Ian Hickson
- Re: Request for Decision: Design Principles Doug Schepers
- Re: Request for Decision: HTML5 Proposal Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: Request for Decision: HTML5 Proposal Dan Connolly
- Re: Request for Decision: Design Principles Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Henri Sivonen
- Re: Request for Decision: Design Principles Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: Precision of <canvas> rendering (was: Re: Formal definition of HTML5) Henri Sivonen
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Michael A. Puls II
- Re: Request for Decision: HTML5 Proposal Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering Sander Tekelenburg
- Re: Request for Decision: Design Principles Doug Schepers
- about this mailing list Marvin Carlos
- Re: Request for Decision: HTML5 Proposal Dan Connolly
- Re: A Concrete Example for the HTML Versioning Debate Jonas Sicking
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo
- Re: Request for Decision: HTML5 Proposal Denis Boudreau (WebConforme)
- Re: Request for Decision: HTML5 Proposal Denis Boudreau (WebConforme)
- Re: Request for Decision: HTML5 Proposal Sean Fraser
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Bill Mason
- Re: Request for Decision: HTML5 Proposal Terje Bless
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo
- RE: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Matthew Ratzloff
- RE: Microsoft versioning proposal Chris Wilson
- RE: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Chris Wilson
- RE: Precision of <canvas> rendering (was: Re: Formal definition of HTML5) Chris Wilson
- RE: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Chris Wilson
Tuesday, 17 April 2007
- Re: RDFa Use Cases and Primer Working Drafts - Comments Welcome! ben@hedrington.com
Wednesday, 18 April 2007
- Re: A Concrete Example for the HTML Versioning Debate Jeff Schiller
- Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering liorean
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Michael A. Puls II
- Re: Precision of <canvas> rendering (was: Re: Formal definition of HTML5) David Dailey
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Henri Sivonen
- Re: A Concrete Example for the HTML Versioning Debate Henri Sivonen
- Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering Julian Reschke
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Michael A. Puls II
- Re: Introduce <term> element Olivier GENDRIN
- Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering Magnus Kristiansen
- Re: tasks to supplement HTML specification development Henrik Dvergsdal
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Matthew Raymond
- Re: A Concrete Example for the HTML Versioning Debate Ian Hickson
- Re: A Concrete Example for the HTML Versioning Debate Henrik Dvergsdal
- Re: A Concrete Example for the HTML Versioning Debate Andrew Sidwell
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Dão Gottwald
- Re: A Concrete Example for the HTML Versioning Debate Dão Gottwald
- Re: Precision of <canvas> rendering (was: Re: Formal definition of HTML5) Henri Sivonen
- Re: Perception of HTML5 (was Re: Formal definition of HTML5) Henrik Dvergsdal
- Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Roger Johansson
- Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Dannii
- Re: A Concrete Example for the HTML Versioning Debate Jeff Schiller
- Re: A Concrete Example for the HTML Versioning Debate Anne van Kesteren
- Re: A Concrete Example for the HTML Versioning Debate Jeff Schiller
- Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Anne van Kesteren
- Re: A Concrete Example for the HTML Versioning Debate Ian Hickson
- static and dinamic schemes Dmitry Turin
- Re: A Concrete Example for the HTML Versioning Debate Jeff Schiller
- RE: Request for Decision: Design Principles Dailey, David P.
- Re: A Concrete Example for the HTML Versioning Debate Ian Hickson
- A Concrete Example for the HTML Versioning Debate Jeff Schiller
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Karl Dubost
- Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Dylan Smith
- Request for Decision: HTML5 Proposal Maciej Stachowiak
- Request for Decision: Design Principles Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate] Karl Dubost
- Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering Dailey, David P.
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Karl Dubost
- Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering Simon Pieters
- RE: Eolas vs. <object> Dailey, David P.
- Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering Anne van Kesteren
- Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering Karl Dubost
- The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Matthew Raymond
- Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype Karl Dubost
- Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype L. David Baron
- Re: Microsoft versioning proposal Dannii
- Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype Boris Zbarsky
- Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype Murray Maloney
- RE: Precision of <canvas> rendering (was: Re: Formal definition of HTML5) Dailey, David P.
Tuesday, 17 April 2007
- Re: [XBL Primer] new scenarios John Boyer
- Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate] Dão Gottwald
- Re: Eolas vs. <object> Karl Dubost
- Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate] Henk-Jan de Boer
- Re: Microsoft versioning proposal Dão Gottwald
- Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate] Henk-Jan de Boer
- Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype David Håsäther
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Dão Gottwald
- Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype Matthew Ratzloff
- Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
- Re: Perception of HTML5 (was Re: Formal definition of HTML5) Marcos Caceres
- Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype Simon Pieters
- Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
- RE: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype Chris Wilson
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Dão Gottwald
- Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype Doug Schepers
- Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype Maciej Stachowiak
- RE: Microsoft versioning proposal Chris Wilson
- Re: Versioning and the end user Boris Zbarsky
- Re: Versioning and the end user Maciej Stachowiak
- RE: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype Chris Wilson
- Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: Perception of HTML5 (was Re: Formal definition of HTML5) Henrik Dvergsdal
- RE: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate] Chris Wilson
- RE: Versioning and the end user Chris Wilson
- Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype Matthew Ratzloff
- Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype Jonas Sicking
- Re: Versioning and the end user Matthew Ratzloff
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Dão Gottwald
- Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henri Sivonen
- Re: Precision of <canvas> rendering (was: Re: Formal definition of HTML5) David Hyatt
- Precision of <canvas> rendering (was: Re: Formal definition of HTML5) Henri Sivonen
- RE: Versioning and html[5] Chris Wilson
- RE: Versioning and html[5] Chris Wilson
- If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype Maciej Stachowiak
- Eolas vs. <object> Jeff Schiller
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Doug Schepers
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) liorean
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Jonas Sicking
- Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate] Bruce Boughton
- Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Roger Johansson
- Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate] Dão Gottwald
- Re: Versioning and the end user Boris Zbarsky
- Re: Versioning and the end user Matthew Ratzloff
- Re: Perception of HTML5 (was Re: Formal definition of HTML5) Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate] Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Dão Gottwald
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Dão Gottwald
- Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate] Dão Gottwald
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Boris Zbarsky
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) James Graham
- Re: RDFa Use Cases and Primer Working Drafts - Comments Welcome! Dão Gottwald
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) liorean
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Boris Zbarsky
- Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate] Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Dão Gottwald
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) James Graham
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) David Dailey
- Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate] liorean
- Re: RDFa Use Cases and Primer Working Drafts - Comments Welcome! David Dailey
- RDFa Use Cases and Primer Working Drafts - Comments Welcome! Ben Adida
- Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate] Dão Gottwald
- Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Dão Gottwald
Monday, 16 April 2007
- Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Shane Thacker
- Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate] Henk-Jan de Boer
Tuesday, 17 April 2007
- Perception of HTML5 (was Re: Formal definition of HTML5) Henrik Dvergsdal
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Ian Hickson
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henri Sivonen
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Dannii
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henrik Dvergsdal
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Dão Gottwald
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Ian Hickson
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henrik Dvergsdal
- Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate cadunn
- Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Murray Maloney
- Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Dylan Smith
- Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Matthew Raymond
- Re: Versioning and the end user Boris Zbarsky
- Versioning and the end user Preston L. Bannister
Monday, 16 April 2007
- Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
Tuesday, 17 April 2007
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Ian Hickson
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henrik Dvergsdal
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henrik Dvergsdal
- Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering T.V Raman
Monday, 16 April 2007
- Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering David Hyatt
- Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Bruce Boughton
- Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering Bruce Boughton
- Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering T.V Raman
- Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate cadunn
- Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering Murray Maloney
- Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering Murray Maloney
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Ian Hickson
- RE: Versioning and html[5] Ian Hickson
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 Terje Bless
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Dão Gottwald
- RE: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Ian Hickson
- Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Dão Gottwald
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Arthur Jennings
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Ian Hickson
- Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering David Hyatt
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Ian Hickson
- Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering Murray Maloney
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate liorean
- Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering Murray Maloney
- RE: Versioning and html[5] Chris Wilson
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Joe D'Andrea
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Kornel Lesinski
- Re: Non-goal for HTML: A Graphics API Ariel Perez
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Dan Connolly
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) David Dailey
- Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering David Hyatt
- Re: Pandering to poor authorship (was Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>) Sander Tekelenburg
- Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: Non-goal for HTML: A Graphics API Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: Aphorisms of First Principle [was Proposed Design Principles] David Dailey
- Non-goal for HTML: A Graphics API Murray Maloney
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Jeff Cutsinger
- RE: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) T.V Raman
- Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering Murray Maloney
- RE: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Chris Wilson
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Doug Schepers
- usability testing [was: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>] David Dailey
- RE: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) T.V Raman
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henri Sivonen
- RE: Versioning and html[5] Joe D'Andrea
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) James Graham
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Julian Reschke
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henrik Dvergsdal
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henrik Dvergsdal
- Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Dannii
Sunday, 15 April 2007
- RE: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Philip Taylor
- Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate aurélien levy
Monday, 16 April 2007
- Re: [whatwg] Video proposals Matthew Raymond
- Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Dão Gottwald
- Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Henri Sivonen
- Re: Pandering to poor authorship (was Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>) Dão Gottwald
- Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Dão Gottwald
- Re: Pandering to poor authorship (was Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>) Dão Gottwald
- Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Dão Gottwald
- Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Henri Sivonen
- Re: Pandering to poor authorship (was Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>) Mike Schinkel
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Mike Schinkel
- Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate] James Graham
- Re: Pandering to poor authorship (was Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>) Dão Gottwald
- Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Mike Schinkel
- Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Dão Gottwald
- Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Mike Schinkel
- Re: Pandering to poor authorship (was Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>) Mike Schinkel
- Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Mike Schinkel
- Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Mike Schinkel
- Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Anne van Kesteren
- Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate] Anne van Kesteren
- Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate] Anne van Kesteren
- Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate] Lachlan Hunt
- Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate] Anne van Kesteren
- Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate] Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: HTML/XHTML Anne van Kesteren
- RE: Versioning and html[5] Chris Wilson
- Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate] Preston L. Bannister
- RE: Versioning and html[5] Ian Hickson
- Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Murray Maloney
- RE: Versioning and html[5] Dailey, David P.
- RE: Versioning and html[5] Dave Raggett
- RE: Versioning and html[5] Ian Hickson
- RE: Versioning and html[5] Dave Raggett
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Ian Hickson
Sunday, 15 April 2007
- Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Lachlan Hunt
- Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate] Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Lachlan Hunt
- Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate] Henrik Dvergsdal
- Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
- Re: Aphorisms of First Principle [was Proposed Design Principles] Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Sander Tekelenburg
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate] Alexander Graf
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Sean Fraser
- Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate] Preston L. Bannister
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Boris Zbarsky
- Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Murray Maloney
- Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate] Sean Fraser
- Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Henri Sivonen
- Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate] Denis Boudreau (WebConforme)
- Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate] Roger Johansson
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Dão Gottwald
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Dão Gottwald
- Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Lachlan Hunt
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henrik Dvergsdal
- Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Denis Boudreau (WebConforme)
- legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate] Dailey, David P.
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Denis Boudreau (WebConforme)
- Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
- Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
- Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
- oops Chris Wilson
- Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Joe D'Andrea
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Matthew Raymond
- How frozen is frozen? Kornel Lesinski
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henri Sivonen
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henri Sivonen
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henrik Dvergsdal
- Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Magnus Kristiansen
- Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Alexander Graf
- Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Bruce Boughton
- Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Kornel Lesinski
- Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Mihai Sucan
- Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Roger Johansson
- Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Alexander Graf
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Bruce Boughton
- Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Lachlan Hunt
- Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Bruce Boughton
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henri Sivonen
- Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Mihai Sucan
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henri Sivonen
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Bruce Boughton
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henri Sivonen
- Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Bruce Boughton
- Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Mihai Sucan
- RE: Versioning and html[5] Håkon Wium Lie
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henrik Dvergsdal
- Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate cadunn
- Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Michael A. Puls II
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henri Sivonen
- RE: Versioning and html[5] Sander Tekelenburg
- A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Lachlan Hunt
- Re: Opt-in solutions ...and problems Sander Tekelenburg
- Re: Pandering to poor authorship (was Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>) Sander Tekelenburg
- Re: Introduce <term> element Preston L. Bannister
- RE: Versioning and html[5] Ian Hickson
- RE: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Dailey, David P.
- Re: Patents and public (was: RE: Proposal to Adopt HTML5) Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Maciej Stachowiak
- RE: Patents and public Chris Wilson
- RE: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Ian Hickson
- RE: Versioning and html[5] Chris Wilson
- RE: Versioning and html[5] Chris Wilson
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Matthew Raymond
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Lachlan Hunt
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Matthew Raymond
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Mike Schinkel
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Bruce Boughton
- RE: Versioning and html[5] Chris Wilson
- RE: Versioning and html[5] Chris Wilson
- RE: Versioning and html[5] Chris Wilson
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Alexander Graf
- RE: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Chris Wilson
- RE: Versioning and html[5] Chris Wilson
- Re: Pandering to poor authorship (was Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>) Mike Schinkel
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Mike Schinkel
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Mike Schinkel
Saturday, 14 April 2007
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Mike Schinkel
- Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Mike Schinkel
- RE: Versioning and html[5] Chris Wilson
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Alexander Graf
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Alexander Graf
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Håkon Wium Lie
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Dylan Smith
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henrik Dvergsdal
- Re: Pandering to poor authorship (was Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>) Dylan Smith
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Mike Schinkel
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Mike Schinkel
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Mike Schinkel
- Re: HTML/XHTML Henri Sivonen
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Joe D'Andrea
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Jirka Kosek
- Re: Current working draft Benjamin Chait
- RE: Current working draft Dailey, David P.
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Matthew Raymond
- Current working draft Schalk Neethling
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Matthew Raymond
- Re: HTML/XHTML liorean
- HTML/XHTML Schalk Neethling
- taking threads to www-archive or offline altogether Dan Connolly
- Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Murray Maloney
- Re: Version information Dan Connolly
- Re: Version information David Håsäther
Friday, 13 April 2007
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Kornel Lesinski
Saturday, 14 April 2007
- Re: Version information Murray Maloney
- Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
- Re: Patents and public Matthew Raymond
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Bruce Boughton
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Ben Ward
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henri Sivonen
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Lachlan Hunt
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Dão Gottwald
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henri Sivonen
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Dão Gottwald
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Matt Freels
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Matt Freels
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henri Sivonen
- Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Mike Schinkel
- Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Mike Schinkel
- Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
- Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Roger Johansson
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henrik Dvergsdal
- Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Mike Schinkel
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Mike Schinkel
- Re: Aphorisms of First Principle [was Proposed Design Principles] Mike Schinkel
- Re: Patents and public Mike Schinkel
- Re: Pandering to poor authorship (was Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>) Mike Schinkel
- Re: Level of specification detail Mike Schinkel
- Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Mike Schinkel
- Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Mike Schinkel
- Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Mike Schinkel
- Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Mike Schinkel
- Re: Version information Mike Schinkel
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Mike Schinkel
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Mike Schinkel
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Mike Schinkel
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Mike Schinkel
- Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Mike Schinkel
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Lachlan Hunt
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Lachlan Hunt
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Boris Zbarsky
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Boris Zbarsky
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Maciej Stachowiak
Friday, 13 April 2007
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Matthew Ratzloff
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Bruce Boughton
- RE: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Ian Hickson
- RE: Versioning and html[5] Ian Hickson
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Dão Gottwald
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Arthur Jennings
- RE: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Chris Wilson
- RE: Versioning and html[5] Chris Wilson
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Geoffrey Sneddon
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Matthew Ratzloff
- RE: Versioning and html[5] Chris Wilson
- RE: Versioning and html[5] Chris Wilson
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Ian Hickson
- RE: Versioning and html[5] Chris Wilson
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Arthur Jennings
- RE: Versioning and html[5] Chris Wilson
- RE: Versioning and html[5] Matthew Ratzloff
- RE: Level of specification detail (Was Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5) Chris Wilson
- RE: Versioning and html[5] Chris Wilson
- Re: denying users direct access to document source Anne van Kesteren
- denying users direct access to document source Gregory J. Rosmaita
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henrik Dvergsdal
- User Agent (browser) WG at W3C [was: New discussion group are need] Gregory J. Rosmaita
- Microsoft versioning proposal Anne van Kesteren
- RE: Versioning and html[5] Chris Wilson
- RE: Level of specification detail (Was Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5) Chris Wilson
- RE: Versioning and html[5] Chris Wilson
- RE: Versioning and html[5] Chris Wilson
- RE: Versioning and html[5] Chris Wilson
- RE: Versioning and html[5] Chris Wilson
- RE: Versioning and html[5] Chris Wilson
- RE: Versioning and html[5] Chris Wilson
- RE: Intent to Conform (was Re: Version information) Chris Wilson
- RE: Patents and public (was: RE: Proposal to Adopt HTML5) Chris Wilson
- Re: Versioning and html[5] James Graham
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Lachlan Hunt
- Re: Version information Lachlan Hunt
- Re: New discussion group are need Dmitry Turin
- Re: Version information Murray Maloney
- Re: New discussion group are need Olivier GENDRIN
- Re: New discussion group are need James Graham
- New discussion group are need Dmitry Turin
- Re[2]: special immediate form: TREE Dmitry Turin
- RE: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 mikko.honkala@nokia.com
Wednesday, 11 April 2007
- RE: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 mikko.honkala@nokia.com
Friday, 13 April 2007
- special immediate form: SELECT (LOOKER) Dmitry Turin
- Re: special immediate form: TREE special immediate form: TREE special immediate form: TREE Bruce Boughton
- special immediate form: TREE special immediate form: TREE special immediate form: TREE Dmitry Turin
- Re: small consultation Bruce Boughton
- small consultation Dmitry Turin
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henrik Dvergsdal
- Re: wg members status stefan2904
- Re: Opt-in solutions ...and problems (was Re: Versioning and html[5]) Simon Pieters
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Geoffrey Sneddon
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Ian Hickson
- Re: Opt-in solutions ...and problems (was Re: Versioning and html[5]) Bruce Boughton
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Mihai Sucan
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Anne van Kesteren
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henri Sivonen
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Dave Raggett
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henrik Dvergsdal
- regrets Daniel Glazman
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Anne van Kesteren
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Dão Gottwald
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Laurens Holst
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Ian Hickson
- Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Ian Hickson
- Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henrik Dvergsdal
- Re: Mask in string of address Laurens Holst
- Mask in string of address Dmitry Turin
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: Opt-in solutions ...and problems (was Re: Versioning and html[5]) Dão Gottwald
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Dão Gottwald
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Dão Gottwald
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Lachlan Hunt
- Re: Version information Henri Sivonen
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Dão Gottwald
- Re: Version information Henrik Dvergsdal
- are necessary tag PACK ? Dmitry Turin
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: Version information Lachlan Hunt
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Henri Sivonen
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Boris Zbarsky
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Laurens Holst
- Aphorisms of First Principle [was Proposed Design Principles] Dailey, David P.
- Re: Opt-in solutions ...and problems (was Re: Versioning and html[5]) Benjamin Chait
- Opt-in solutions ...and problems (was Re: Versioning and html[5]) Matthew Ratzloff
- Re: Level of specification detail (Was Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5) Benjamin West
- Re: Level of specification detail (Was Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5) Dan Connolly
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Ian Hickson
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Karl Dubost
Thursday, 12 April 2007
- Re: wg members status Davide Oliva
Friday, 13 April 2007
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Simon Pieters
- Re: Level of specification detail (Was Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5) Dylan Smith
- Re: Pandering to poor authorship (was Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>) Dylan Smith
Thursday, 12 April 2007
- RE: Versioning and html[5] Ian Hickson
- RE: Versioning and html[5] Håkon Wium Lie
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Bruce Boughton
- Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
- RE: Versioning and html[5] Chris Wilson
- Re: Deviance from SGML (was Re: Version information) Ian Hickson
- Re: Version information Ian Hickson
- Deviance from SGML (was Re: Version information) Henrik Dvergsdal
- RE: Versioning and html[5] Ian Hickson
- RE: Intent to Conform (was Re: Version information) Chris Wilson
- RE: Versioning and html[5] Chris Wilson
- RE: Versioning and html[5] Chris Wilson
- Re: Version information Eric Daspet
- RE: Versioning and html[5] Chris Wilson
- RE: Versioning and html[5] Chris Wilson
- Re: Versioning and html[5] David Håsäther
- Re: Version information Simon Pieters
- RE: Versioning and html[5] Chris Wilson
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Schalk Neethling
- Re: Version information Henrik Dvergsdal
- Re: Version information Simon Pieters
- Re: Version information Ian Hickson
- Re: Version information ryan
- Re: Patents and public (was: RE: Proposal to Adopt HTML5) Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: Version information Henrik Dvergsdal
- Re: Version information Simon Pieters
- Re: Version information David Håsäther
- Re: Version information Ian Hickson
- Re: Version information Henrik Dvergsdal
- Re: Version information David Håsäther
- Re: Version information Henrik Dvergsdal
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Ian Hickson
- Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Dão Gottwald
- Re: Intent to Conform (was Re: Version information) Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Dão Gottwald
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo
- <object> attributes (Was: Versioning and html[5]) Ian Hickson
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Henri Sivonen
- Re: Level of specification detail (Was Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5) Nick Drago
- Re: Versioning and html[5] James Graham
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Simon Pieters
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 (patent policy FAQ)) Dan Connolly
- Re: Intent to Conform (was Re: Version information) Boris Zbarsky
- Re: Intent to Conform (was Re: Version information) L. David Baron
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Dave Raggett
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Sander Tekelenburg
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Boris Zbarsky
- RE: Intent to Conform (was Re: Version information) Chris Wilson
- Patents and public (was: RE: Proposal to Adopt HTML5) Chris Wilson
- Re: Intent to Conform (was Re: Version information) Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: Versioning and html[5] Henri Sivonen
- Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Rene Saarsoo
- Re: wg members status Ariel Perez
- Re: wg members status Razvan MIHAIU
- RE: Versioning and html[5] Chris Wilson
- Versioning and html[5] Chris Wilson
- RE: Intent to Conform (was Re: Version information) Chris Wilson
- Re: Level of specification detail Sander Tekelenburg
- Re: Alternate HTML 5 adoption proposal? Sander Tekelenburg
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Sander Tekelenburg
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Matthew Raymond
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 James Graham
- Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Dao Gottwald
- RE: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Ben Meadowcroft
- Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Dao Gottwald
- Re[2]: brainstorm: repeating form controls Dmitry Turin
- Re: Pandering to poor authorship (was Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>) Bruce Boughton
- Re: Level of specification detail Anne van Kesteren
- Re: Design Principles updated Henri Sivonen
- Re: Level of specification detail (Was Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5) liorean
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Joe D'Andrea
- Re: tasks to supplement HTML specification development Zdenko Vujasinović
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Laurens Holst
- Re: Design Principles updated Laurens Holst
- Re: Design Principles updated Henri Sivonen
- Re: Intent to Conform (was Re: Version information) Laurens Holst
- Re: Pandering to poor authorship (was Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>) Dylan Smith
- Re: Level of specification detail Dylan Smith
- Re: Design Principles updated Laurens Holst
- Design Principles updated Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: Organization Weakness Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Ian Hickson
- Re: Organization Weakness Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Maciej Stachowiak
- Organization Weakness Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Karl Dubost
- Re: splitting HTML5 into chunks Michael A. Puls II
- Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Bruce Boughton
- Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Mike Schinkel
- Re: Level of specification detail (Was Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5) Mike Schinkel
- Re: Level of specification detail (Was Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5) Mike Schinkel
- Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Bruce Boughton
- Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Mike Schinkel
- Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Mike Schinkel
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Ian Hickson
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Mike Schinkel
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Mike Schinkel
- Re: splitting HTML5 into chunks Philip Taylor
- Re: Level of specification detail (Was Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5) Karl Dubost
Wednesday, 11 April 2007
- Re: wg members status Nick Drago
Thursday, 12 April 2007
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 -- procedural issue Karl Dubost
- Canvas testing Re: tasks to supplement HTML specification development Karl Dubost
Wednesday, 11 April 2007
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Arthur Jennings
- Re: splitting HTML5 into chunks [was: Proposal to Adopt HTML5] Michael A. Puls II
- Re: wg members status Michael A. Puls II
- splitting HTML5 into chunks [was: Proposal to Adopt HTML5] Dan Connolly
- Re: tasks to supplement HTML specification development Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Ian Hickson
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: Alternate HTML 5 adoption proposal? (Was Re: Level of specification detail) Matthew Ratzloff
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Ian Hickson
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Bruce Boughton
- Re: Alternate HTML 5 adoption proposal? (Was Re: Level of specification detail) Henri Sivonen
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Benjamin Chait
- Re: wg members status Benjamin Chait
- Re: Alternate HTML 5 adoption proposal? (Was Re: Level of specification detail) Matthew Ratzloff
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Ian Hickson
- Re: Level of specification detail (Was Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5) Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: wg members status stefan2904
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Zdenko Vujasinović
- Re: wg members status Ariel Perez
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Josef Spillner
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Sylvain Eliade
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Philip Taylor
- Re: tasks to supplement HTML specification development Benjamin Chait
- Re: wg members status Ariel Perez
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 -- procedural issue Lachlan Hunt
- Re: Alternate HTML 5 adoption proposal? (Was Re: Level of specification detail) Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Henri Sivonen
- Re: tasks to supplement HTML specification development David Håsäther
- Re: tasks to supplement HTML specification development Sean Fraser
- Re: Alternate HTML 5 adoption proposal? (Was Re: Level of specification detail) Henri Sivonen
- Alternate HTML 5 adoption proposal? (Was Re: Level of specification detail) Matthew Ratzloff
- Re: Level of specification detail (Was Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5) ryan
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Sander Tekelenburg
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 -- procedural issue Denis Boudreau (WebConforme)
- Re: brainstorm: lines and existing html-elements David Dailey
- tasks to supplement HTML specification development Dan Connolly
- Re: Level of specification detail (Was Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5) Dan Connolly
- Care with subject lines and threads [was: Proposal to Adopt ...] Dan Connolly
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 -- procedural issue Dan Connolly
- access to client-side files [was: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 -- procedural issue] David Dailey
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Laurens Holst
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Laurens Holst
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Laurens Holst
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Geoffrey Sneddon
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Anne van Kesteren
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Laurens Holst
- Re: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group Matthew Raymond
- brainstorm: lines and existing html-elements Dmitry Turin
- Re: wg members status Daniel Glazman
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Geoffrey Sneddon
- Re: Level of specification detail (Was Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5) Anne van Kesteren
- Re: wg members status Henrik Dvergsdal
- Level of specification detail (Was Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5) Henrik Dvergsdal
- Re: wg members status Andy Hume
- Re: wg members status Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: wg members status Ian Hickson
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 -- procedural issue Cameron McCormack
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 -- procedural issue Maciej Stachowiak
- wg members status Daniel Glazman
- Re: Introduce <term> element Elliott Sprehn
- Re: Introduce <term> element Mallory Mollo
- RE: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 -- procedural issue Ian Hickson
- RE: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 -- procedural issue Dailey, David P.
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Daniel Glazman
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Matthew Raymond
Tuesday, 10 April 2007
- Re: abbreviations in canonical HTML (thoughts & concrete suggestions) John McKenzie
Wednesday, 11 April 2007
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Dan Connolly
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Kai Hendry
Tuesday, 10 April 2007
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Dan Connolly
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 -- procedural issue Dan Connolly
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Henrik Dvergsdal
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Niko Neugebauer
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Ian Hickson
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Charles McCathieNevile
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Ian Hickson
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 James Graham
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Elliott Sprehn
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Elliott Sprehn
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Rimantas Liubertas
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Anne van Kesteren
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 David McFarland
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Carol King
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 deres
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 cadunn
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Roger Johansson
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Roger Johansson
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Anne van Kesteren
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 David Hyatt
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Henri Sivonen
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Boris Zbarsky
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Henrik Dvergsdal
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Henrik Dvergsdal
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Henrik Dvergsdal
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Anne van Kesteren
- RE: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Chris Wilson
- RE: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Chris Wilson
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Ian Hickson
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 L. David Baron
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Anne van Kesteren
- RE: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Robert Brodrecht
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Henri Sivonen
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Henrik Dvergsdal
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 James Graham
- RE: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Matthew Ratzloff
- RE: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Håkon Wium Lie
- RE: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 David Dailey
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Daniel Glazman
- RE: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Chris Wilson
- RE: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Chris Wilson
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Craig Saila
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 paul haine
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Doug Schepers
- Re: Overall strategy (Was Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5) Henrik Dvergsdal
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Denis Boudreau (WebConforme)
- RE: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 -- procedural issue Dailey, David P.
- Re: Overall strategy Ian Hickson
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Shawn Medero
- Re: Overall strategy (Was Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5) Maciej Stachowiak
- Overall strategy (Was Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5) Henrik Dvergsdal
- Re: innerHTML and setTimeout liorean
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Daniel Schattenkirchner
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Geoffrey Sneddon
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Dao Gottwald
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Henrik Dvergsdal
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Anne van Kesteren
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Karl Dubost
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Lachlan Hunt
Monday, 9 April 2007
- Re: beforeprint event Andy Hume
Tuesday, 10 April 2007
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Raven Brooks
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Daniel Glazman
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Dao Gottwald
- Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Doug Jones
- Re: innerHTML and setTimeout Dao Gottwald
- Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Maciej Stachowiak
- RE: innerHTML and setTimeout Dailey, David P.
Monday, 9 April 2007
- Re: innerHTML and setTimeout Lachlan Hunt
- Re: Introduce <term> element Doug Jones
- Re: innerHTML and setTimeout Charles McCathieNevile
- Re: innerHTML and setTimeout Schalk Neethling
- Re: innerHTML and setTimeout Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: Canvas Anne van Kesteren
- RE: beforeprint event Chris Wilson
- Re: innerHTML and setTimeout Dao Gottwald
- Re: innerHTML and setTimeout Dao Gottwald
- Re: beforeprint event Dao Gottwald
- Re: Version information Anne van Kesteren
- Re: Version information Henrik Dvergsdal
- Re: Canvas Doug Schepers
- Re: innerHTML and setTimeout liorean
- Re: innerHTML and setTimeout Dao Gottwald
- Re: Intent to Conform (was Re: Version information) Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: Version information M. Jackson Wilkinson
- RE: Intent to Conform (was Re: Version information) Chris Wilson
- Intent to Conform (was Re: Version information) Maciej Stachowiak
- innerHTML and setTimeout David Dailey
- RE: beforeprint event Chris Wilson
- Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Alexander Graf
- Re: Version information Anne van Kesteren
- Re: Version information Henrik Dvergsdal
- Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Alexander Graf
- Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Dao Gottwald
- Re: beforeprint event Dao Gottwald
- Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Mike Schinkel
- Re: brainstorm: repeating form controls Henri Sivonen
- brainstorm: alternative form controls Dmitry Turin
- brainstorm: repeating form controls Dmitry Turin
- Re: beforeprint event Anne van Kesteren
- Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Dao Gottwald
- Re: beforeprint event Dao Gottwald
- Re: Introduce <term> element Mike Schinkel
- Re: Use the role-attribute instead of predefined class names Mike Schinkel
- Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Mike Schinkel
- beforeprint event (was: Re: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group) Anne van Kesteren
- Re: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group Dao Gottwald
- Re: Mandated Video Format Mike Schinkel
- Re: The HTMLWG and WHATWG (Was: Default (informal) Style Sheet) Mike Schinkel
- Re: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group Matthew Raymond
- RE: Version information Ian Hickson
- Re: Version information Magnus Kristiansen
- RE: Version information Chris Wilson
- RE: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group Chris Wilson
- RE: Version information Chris Wilson
- RE: Version information Chris Wilson
- Re: Canvas Karl Dubost
Sunday, 8 April 2007
- Semantics is not semantics (was: HTML WG Glossary) Preston L. Bannister
- Re: <table> terse mode for data entry Preston L. Bannister
- Re: <table> terse mode for data entry Elliott Sprehn
- Re: Canvas Dao Gottwald
- Re: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group Matthew Raymond
- <table> terse mode for data entry Dailey, David P.
- HTML WG Glossary Doug Jones
- Re: <table type="rowsortable"> Bruce Boughton
- Re: rel=noreferrer Rick Mans
- Re: Canvas Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: Canvas Laurens Holst
- Re: rel=noreferrer Dao Gottwald
- Re: Version information Dao Gottwald
- Re: Canvas Laurens Holst
- rel=noreferrer Robert Accettura
- Re: Use the role-attribute instead of predefined class names Matthew Raymond
- Re: <table type="rowsortable"> Preston L. Bannister
- RE: Use the role-attribute instead of predefined class names Dailey, David P.
- VP3 as the Mandated Video Format? Matthew Raymond
- Canvas [was RE: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group] Dailey, David P.
- Re: Use the role-attribute instead of predefined class names Matthew Raymond
- Re: Use the role-attribute instead of predefined class names Matthew Raymond
- RE: <table type="rowsortable"> Dailey, David P.
- Re: Canvas Andrew Fedoniouk
Saturday, 7 April 2007
- Re: Version information Lachlan Hunt
- Re: Version information Michael A. Puls II
- Re: Version information Dao Gottwald
- RE: Version information Chris Wilson
- Re: [whatwg] Default (informal) Style Sheet Sander Tekelenburg
- Re: Use the role-attribute instead of predefined class names Dao Gottwald
- Re: [whatwg] Default (informal) Style Sheet Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo
- Re: [whatwg] Default (informal) Style Sheet Sander Tekelenburg
- Re: Use the role-attribute instead of predefined class names Laurens Holst
- Re: [whatwg] Default (informal) Style Sheet Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo
- Re: [whatwg] Default (informal) Style Sheet Sander Tekelenburg
- Re: Use the role-attribute instead of predefined class names Matthew Raymond
- Re: Use the role-attribute instead of predefined class names Laurens Holst
- Re: Version information Laurens Holst
- Re: Version information Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo
- RE: Version information Håkon Wium Lie
- Re: Canvas Doug Schepers
- Re: Version information Anne van Kesteren
- Re: Version information Ian Hickson
- Re: Version information Lachlan Hunt
- Re: Version information Boris Zbarsky
- Re: Version information L. David Baron
Friday, 6 April 2007
- RE: Version information Chris Wilson
- Re: Version information Elliott Sprehn
- Re: Version information Maciej Stachowiak
- RE: Version information Ian Hickson
- RE: Version information Chris Wilson
- Re: CSS for print (was: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group) Håkon Wium Lie
- Re: Canvas Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: Canvas David Hyatt
- Re: Canvas David Hyatt
- Re: Canvas Doug Schepers
- Re: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group Andy Hume
- RE: Canvas Ian Hickson
- Re: Canvas Andrew Fedoniouk
- RE: Version information Ian Hickson
- RE: Mandated Video Format Robert Brodrecht
- Re: Canvas (was: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group) Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: Version information Maciej Stachowiak
- <canvas> (was Re: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group) Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: Canvas Doug Schepers
- Re: Canvas (was: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group) Andrew Fedoniouk
- RE: Canvas Chris Wilson
- RE: CSS for print Håkon Wium Lie
- RE: Version information Chris Wilson
- Re: Canvas Anne van Kesteren
- Re: Version information Anne van Kesteren
- Canvas (was: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group) Doug Schepers
- RE: CSS for print (was: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group) Chris Wilson
- RE: Version information (was Re: HTML5 vs HTML6) Chris Wilson
- RE: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group Chris Wilson
- Re: Mandated Video Format Preston L. Bannister
- RE: Mandated Video Format Chris Wilson
- Re: Mandated Video Format Robert Brodrecht
- Re: Mandated Video Format Doug Schepers
- RE: Mandated Video Format Dailey, David P.
- RE: Mandated Video Format Dan Connolly
- Re: CSS for print (was: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group) Dave Raggett
- CSS for print (was: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group) Håkon Wium Lie
- Re: Use the role-attribute instead of predefined class names Matthew Raymond
- Re: Use the role-attribute instead of predefined class names Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: [whatwg] Default (informal) Style Sheet Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo
- Re: Use the role-attribute instead of predefined class names Olivier GENDRIN
- Re: [whatwg] Default (informal) Style Sheet Anne van Kesteren
- Re: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group Dave Raggett
- Re: Mandated Video Format Henri Sivonen
- Re: Mandated Video Format Robert Brodrecht
- Re: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group Matthew Raymond
- Re: Why <video>? (was Re: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group) Elliott Sprehn
Thursday, 5 April 2007
- Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML Charles Hinshaw
Friday, 6 April 2007
- Why <video>? (was Re: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group) Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: DefaultStyleSheet05: (was Default (informal) Style Sheet) Sander Tekelenburg
- Re: [whatwg] Default (informal) Style Sheet Sander Tekelenburg
- Re: [whatwg] Default (informal) Style Sheet Sander Tekelenburg
- Re: [whatwg] Default (informal) Style Sheet Sander Tekelenburg
- Version information (was Re: HTML5 vs HTML6) L. David Baron
Thursday, 5 April 2007
- Re: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: Mandated Video Format Henri Sivonen
- RE: Mandated Video Format (was: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group) Håkon Wium Lie
- Re: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group Doug Schepers
- RE:Re: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group Espen Antonsen - 24SevenOffice
- RE: GIF was -- Mandated Video Format (was: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group) Dailey, David P.
- RE: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group Chris Wilson
- Re: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group Dao Gottwald
- RE: Mandated Video Format Chris Wilson
- Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML Asbjørn Ulsberg
- RE: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group Chris Wilson
- RE: Mandated Video Format Håkon Wium Lie
- RE: Mandated Video Format Matthew Ratzloff
- Use the role-attribute instead of predefined class names Daniel Schattenkirchner
- RE: Mandated Video Format (was: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group) Chris Wilson
- Re: The HTMLWG and WHATWG (Was: Default (informal) Style Sheet) Henri Sivonen
- Re: Mandated Video Format (was: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group) Henri Sivonen
- RE: The HTMLWG and WHATWG (Was: Default (informal) Style Sheet) Chris Wilson
- Re: The HTMLWG and WHATWG (Was: Default (informal) Style Sheet) Henri Sivonen
- Re: Mandated Video Format (was: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group) Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo
- RE: Mandated Video Format (was: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group) Chris Wilson
- Re: Mandated Video Format (was: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group) Maciej Stachowiak
- RE: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group Chris Wilson
- RE: Mandated Video Format (was: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group) Chris Wilson
- RE: The HTMLWG and WHATWG (Was: Default (informal) Style Sheet) Chris Wilson
- RE: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group Chris Wilson
- Mandated Video Format (was: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group) Doug Schepers
- Re: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group Doug Schepers
- Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q Dao Gottwald
- Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML Boris Zbarsky
- Re: semantics [was Re: Proposed Design Principles updated] Daniel Glazman
- Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q Olivier GENDRIN
- Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML Olivier GENDRIN
- Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q Dao Gottwald
- Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML Anne van Kesteren
- RE: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group Dailey, David P.
- Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q Olivier GENDRIN
- Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q Olivier GENDRIN
- Re: Form fields for uploading Olivier GENDRIN
- Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML Olivier GENDRIN
- Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML Dao Gottwald
- Re: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group Olivier GENDRIN
- Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML Olivier GENDRIN
- Re: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group Olivier GENDRIN
- Re: The HTMLWG and WHATWG (Was: Default (informal) Style Sheet) Sierk Bornemann
- Re: Proposed Design Principles updated Ian Hickson
- Re: Introduce <term> element Laurens Holst
- Re: Proposed Design Principles updated David Hyatt
- Re: Proposed Design Principles updated olivier Thereaux
- Role of Chair (Was: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group) olivier Thereaux
- Re: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group Matthew Raymond
- Re: <table type="rowsortable"> Preston L. Bannister
- RE: semantics [was Re: Proposed Design Principles updated] Chris Wilson
Wednesday, 4 April 2007
- Re: Form fields for uploading Sander Tekelenburg
- Re: Introduce <term> element Raven Brooks
- Re: Proposed Design Principles updated Dao Gottwald
- Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML Dao Gottwald
- Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML Dao Gottwald
- Re: <table type="rowsortable"> Bruce Boughton
- Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML Dao Gottwald
- Re: <table type="rowsortable"> Dao Gottwald
- Re: Introduce <term> element Robert Brodrecht
- Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML Robert Brodrecht
- Re: <table type="rowsortable"> Bruce Boughton
- Re: <table type="rowsortable"> nene@triin.net
- Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML Boris Zbarsky
- Re: Introduce <term> element nene@triin.net
- Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML Anne van Kesteren
- Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML Robert Brodrecht
- Re: The HTMLWG and WHATWG Ian Hickson
- Re: HTML5 vs HTML6 Chris Wilson
- RE: Let every element have a src attribute Chris Wilson
- RE: Proposed Design Principles updated Chris Wilson
- RE: Proposed Design Principles updated ("don't break the web" vs respecting MIME types) Chris Wilson
- RE: <table type="rowsortable"> Chris Wilson
- Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group Chris Wilson
- Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML Jason A. Lefkowitz
- Re: Proposed Design Principles updated ("don't break the web" vs respecting MIME types) Anne van Kesteren
- Re: Proposed Design Principles updated ("don't break the web" vs respecting MIME types) Dan Connolly
- Re: Let every element have a src attribute Bruce Boughton
- Re: Let every element have a src attribute Bruce Boughton
- Re: Let every element have a src attribute Bruce Boughton
- Re: The HTMLWG and WHATWG Doug Schepers
- Re: <table type="rowsortable"> Anne van Kesteren
- Re: Let every element have a src attribute Anne van Kesteren
- Re: Let every element have a src attribute Jeff Schiller
- Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML Murray Maloney
- <table type="rowsortable"> Dailey, David P.
- semantics [was Re: Proposed Design Principles updated] Dailey, David P.
- Re: Let every element have a src attribute Jeff Schiller
- Re: Proposed Design Principles updated Anne van Kesteren
- Re: Proposed Design Principles updated Asbjørn Ulsberg
- Re: Proposed Design Principles updated Asbjørn Ulsberg
- Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML Asbjørn Ulsberg
- Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML Asbjørn Ulsberg
- Re: HTML5 vs HTML6 Olivier GENDRIN
- Links to DOM Ranges (was Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML) Dave Raggett
- Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML Olivier GENDRIN
- Introduce <term> element Laurens Holst
- Re: Proposed Design Principles updated Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: Proposed Design Principles updated Elliott Sprehn
- Re: Proposed Design Principles updated Ian Hickson
- Re: Proposed Design Principles updated Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: Proposed Design Principles updated Elliott Sprehn
- Re: Proposed Design Principles updated David Hyatt
- Re: HTML5 vs HTML6 T.V Raman
- Re: HTML5 vs HTML6 Brad Fults
- Re: Proposed Design Principles updated Dao Gottwald
- Re: Proposed Design Principles updated Elliott Sprehn
- Re: Proposed Design Principles updated David Hyatt
- Re: Proposed Design Principles updated Karl Dubost
- Re: Proposed Design Principles updated Karl Dubost
- Re: Let every element have a src attribute Matthew Raymond
- Re: Let every element have a src attribute Matthew Raymond
Tuesday, 3 April 2007
- Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML Dao Gottwald
- Re: Proposed Design Principles updated T.V Raman
- HTML5 vs HTML6 T.V Raman
- Re: style.background rendering - browser inconsistency Jeff Schiller
- Re: The HTMLWG and WHATWG (Was: Default (informal) Style Sheet) Ian Hickson
- Re: Proposed Design Principles updated Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: style.background rendering - browser inconsistency Elliott Sprehn
- Re: style.background rendering - browser inconsistency Elliott Sprehn
- style.background rendering - browser inconsistency David Dailey
- Re: Proposed Design Principles updated Murray Maloney
- Re: Proposed Design Principles updated Murray Maloney
- Re: HTML5 vs HTML6 paul haine
- HTML5 vs HTML6 Giovanni Gentili
- Re: Proposed Design Principles updated T.V Raman
- Re: Proposed Design Principles updated Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: The HTMLWG and WHATWG (Was: Default (informal) Style Sheet) Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer
- Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML Anne van Kesteren
- Re: Let every element have a src attribute Jeff Schiller
- Re: Let every element have a src attribute Anne van Kesteren
- Re: Let every element have a src attribute Jeff Schiller
- Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML Gareth Hay
- Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML Murray Maloney
- Re: Let every element have a src attribute Dao Gottwald
- Re: Let every element have a src attribute Murray Maloney
- Re: Proposed Design Principles updated Murray Maloney
- Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q Dao Gottwald
- Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML Elliott Sprehn
- Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML Rimantas Liubertas
- Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML Asbjørn Ulsberg
- Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML Asbjørn Ulsberg
- Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML Anne van Kesteren
- Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q Asbjørn Ulsberg
- Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML Asbjørn Ulsberg
- Re: <abbr>, <acronym> and initialisms Olivier GENDRIN
- Re: <abbr>, <acronym> and initialisms Olivier GENDRIN
- Re: no HTML WG meeting around XTech Henri Sivonen
- Re: text/javascript as default for type attribute Anne van Kesteren
- Re: Let every element have a src attribute Dao Gottwald
- Re: Let every element have a src attribute Dao Gottwald
- Re: no HTML WG meeting around XTech Brian Suda
- Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q Ian Hickson
- Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q Henri Sivonen
- Re: text/javascript as default for type attribute Vitaly Harisov
- Proposed Design Principles updated Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: Let every element have a src attribute Jeff Schiller
- Re: Let every element have a src attribute Matthew Raymond
- Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q Alexander Graf
Monday, 2 April 2007
- RE: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML Lee Roberts
- Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q Ian Hickson
- Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q Dao Gottwald
- Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q Anne van Kesteren
- Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q Henri Sivonen
- Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML Murray Maloney
- Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q Jeff Cutsinger
- Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q Asbjørn Ulsberg
- Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q Ian Hickson
- Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q Dan Connolly
- Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q Dan Connolly
- Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q L. David Baron
- Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q L. David Baron
- Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q Maciej Stachowiak
- argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML Gregory J. Rosmaita
- Re: text/javascript as default for type attribute Anne van Kesteren
- Re: deprecate HR; replace with LS (logical seperator) Anne van Kesteren
- deprecate HR; replace with LS (logical seperator) Gregory J. Rosmaita
- Re: Bring back <ol start="N"> in Strict mode Murray Maloney
- Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q Gregory J. Rosmaita
- Re: Bring back <ol start="N"> in Strict mode Henri Sivonen
- Re: Naming Wiki Pages Mike Schinkel
- Re: Naming Wiki Pages Mike Schinkel
- Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q Gregory J. Rosmaita
- Re: text/javascript as default for type attribute Jeff Cutsinger
- Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: The HTMLWG and WHATWG (Was: Default (informal) Style Sheet) Murray Maloney
- Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q Gregory J. Rosmaita
- Re: Bring back <ol start="N"> in Strict mode Benjamin Chait
- Re: Bring back <ol start="N"> in Strict mode Henri Sivonen
- Re: text/javascript as default for type attribute Jeff Cutsinger
- no HTML WG meeting around XTech Dan Connolly
- Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q Elliott Sprehn
- Re: text/javascript as default for type attribute Denis Boudreau (WebConforme)
- Re: text/javascript as default for type attribute Jeff Schiller
- text/javascript as default for type attribute Vitaly Harisov
- Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q Maciej Stachowiak
- Bring back <ol start="N"> in Strict mode Vitaly Harisov
- Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q Gregory J. Rosmaita
- Re: Naming Wiki Pages Elliott Sprehn
- Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: Naming Wiki Pages Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: Proposed Design Principles T.V Raman
- Re: Form fields for uploading Alexander Graf
- Re: Form fields for uploading Ian Hickson
- Re: The HTMLWG and WHATWG (Was: Default (informal) Style Sheet) Ian Hickson
- Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q Murray Maloney
- Re: abbreviations in canonical HTML (thoughts & concrete suggestions) Murray Maloney
- Re: Form fields for uploading Dao Gottwald
- Re: Form fields for uploading Elliott Sprehn
- ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q Gregory J. Rosmaita
- abbreviations in canonical HTML (thoughts & concrete suggestions) Gregory J. Rosmaita
- Re: Form fields for uploading Alexander Graf
- Re: Form fields for uploading Benjamin Chait
- Form fields for uploading Alexander Graf
- Re: Superstructure markup Henri Sivonen
- Re: Naming Wiki Pages Dan Connolly
- Re: The HTMLWG and WHATWG (Was: Default (informal) Style Sheet) Daniel Glazman
Sunday, 1 April 2007
- Re: [whatwg] Default (informal) Style Sheet Martin Atkins
Monday, 2 April 2007
- New widget: picture html60.narod.ru
- Re: Posting to this list paul haine
- Re: Let every element have a src attribute Elliott Sprehn
- New widget: picture html60.narod.ru
- Re: Let every element have a src attribute Elliott Sprehn
Sunday, 1 April 2007
- Re: Design Principles Document update Preston L. Bannister
Monday, 2 April 2007
- New widget: picture html60.narod.ru
- Re: DefaultStyleSheet05: (was Default (informal) Style Sheet) Karl Dubost
- Re: Let every element have a src attribute Dao Gottwald
- Superstructure markup Olivier GENDRIN
- Re: DefaultStyleSheet05: (was Default (informal) Style Sheet) James Graham
- Re: Let every element have a src attribute Matthew Raymond
- Re: DefaultStyleSheet05: (was Default (informal) Style Sheet) Asbjørn Ulsberg
- Re: [whatwg] Default (informal) Style Sheet Asbjørn Ulsberg
- Re: [whatwg] Default (informal) Style Sheet Asbjørn Ulsberg
- Re: [whatwg] Default (informal) Style Sheet Asbjørn Ulsberg
- Re: Let every element have a src attribute Dao Gottwald
- Re: Naming Wiki Pages Mike Schinkel
- Re: The HTMLWG and WHATWG (Was: Default (informal) Style Sheet) Mike Schinkel
- Re: Naming Wiki Pages Mike Schinkel
- Re: Posting to this list Alexey Feldgendler
- Re: Naming Wiki Pages Marcos Caceres
- Re: Let every element have a src attribute Dao Gottwald
- Re: The HTMLWG and WHATWG (Was: Default (informal) Style Sheet) Ian Hickson
- Re: [whatwg] Default (informal) Style Sheet Anne van Kesteren
- Re: Naming Wiki Pages Anne van Kesteren
- Re: The HTMLWG and WHATWG (Was: Default (informal) Style Sheet) Mike Schinkel
- Re: Naming Wiki Pages Mike Schinkel
- Re: [whatwg] Default (informal) Style Sheet Mike Schinkel
- Re: [whatwg] Default (informal) Style Sheet Sander Tekelenburg
- Re: [whatwg] Default (informal) Style Sheet Sander Tekelenburg
- [admin] switch to monthly archives Karl Dubost
- The HTMLWG and WHATWG (Was: Default (informal) Style Sheet) Ian Hickson
- RE: Naming Wiki Pages Marcos Caceres
- Re: DefaultStyleSheet05: (was Default (informal) Style Sheet) Karl Dubost
- DefaultStyleSheet05: (was Default (informal) Style Sheet) Mike Schinkel
- Browser Fragment Positioning (was Default (informal) Style Sheet) Mike Schinkel
- Re: Default (informal) Style Sheet Mike Schinkel
- RE: Why Have Design Principles? (was Re: Design Principles Document update) Dailey, David P.
- Re: Posting to this list Laurens Holst
Sunday, 1 April 2007
- Why Have Design Principles? (was Re: Design Principles Document update) Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: Posting to this list Doug Schepers
- Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5 Henri Sivonen
- Re: [whatwg] Default (informal) Style Sheet Anne van Kesteren
- Re: [whatwg] Default (informal) Style Sheet Sander Tekelenburg
- Re: Default (informal) Style Sheet Murray Maloney
Saturday, 31 March 2007
- Re: E-mail subscription and RSS Vitaly Harisov
Sunday, 1 April 2007
- Re: [whatwg] <video> element feedback Shadow2531
- Re: Default (informal) Style Sheet Asbjørn Ulsberg
- RE: [whatwg] Default (informal) Style Sheet Kempen, E.J.F. van
- Re: Design Principles Document update Laurens Holst
- Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5 Doug Schepers
- Re: Default (informal) Style Sheet Lachlan Hunt
- Default (informal) Style Sheet Asbjørn Ulsberg
- Re: Proposed Design Principles Asbjørn Ulsberg
- Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5 Asbjørn Ulsberg
- Re: Multipart response support Asbjørn Ulsberg
- Re: E-mail subscription and RSS Lachlan Hunt

Last message date: Monday, 30 April 2007 23:57:52 UTC
Archived on: Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:44:10 UTC

public-html@w3.org from April 2007 by date