public-html@w3.org from April 2007 by date

Monday, 30 April 2007

Re: <font> (was Support Existing Content) Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Support Existing Content Philip & Le Khanh
Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review) David Hyatt
Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review) David Hyatt
Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review) Tina Holmboe
Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review) Tina Holmboe
Re: [suggestion] Allow DIV inside any element Dão Gottwald
Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review) David Hyatt
Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal John Boyer
Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal John Boyer
Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review) Tina Holmboe
Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal John Boyer
Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much? John Boyer
Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review) Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Introduce <term> element Olivier GENDRIN
Re: How to refer to place of document, which is not marked by author!? Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review) David Hyatt
Re: [suggestion] Allow DIV inside any element Maurice
Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review) Tina Holmboe
Re: [suggestion] Allow DIV inside any element M. Jackson Wilkinson
Re: [suggestion] Allow DIV inside any element Maurice
Re: Allow DIV inside any element Maurice
Re: [suggestion] Allow DIV inside any element Maurice
Re: [suggestion] Allow DIV inside any element Maurice
Re: How to refer to place of document, which is not marked by author!? Arthur Jennings
Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal Maurice
Re: [suggestion] Allow DIV inside any element Schalk Neethling
Re: Pandering to poor authorship Maurice
Re: Introduce <term> element Maurice
Re: Versioning and the end user Maurice
Re: missing principle Maurice
Re: Hand-coding HTML (was: New html-element: table3) Maurice
Re: Semantic vs. Presentational (was Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>) Maurice
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Maurice
Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review) Gareth Hay
Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review) Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review) Elliott Sprehn
Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review) David Dailey
Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review) James Graham
Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review) James Graham
Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review) Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: Meta-question : why so few "Re: " subjects ? Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review) Murray Maloney
Re: Meta-question : why so few "Re: " subjects ? Anne van Kesteren
Meta-question : why so few "Re: " subjects ? Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review) Gareth Hay
Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review) Maciej Stachowiak
Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much? Simon Pieters
Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review) Murray Maloney
Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much? Simon Pieters
Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much? Dave Raggett
Re: Desing principles - Support World Languages example added David Dailey
Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much? Anne van Kesteren
Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much? Mark Birbeck
Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much? Mark Birbeck
Re: Desing principles - Support World Languages example added Jirka Kosek
Re: [suggestion] Allow DIV inside any element Cameron McCormack
Re: [suggestion] Allow DIV inside any element Dão Gottwald

Sunday, 29 April 2007

Re: [suggestion] Allow DIV inside any element Andrew Stibbard

Monday, 30 April 2007

Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much? Dave Raggett
Re: Desing principles - Support World Languages example added Anne van Kesteren
Re: HTML version issue summary? Dão Gottwald
Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much? Simon Pieters
Re: HTML version issue summary? Maciej Stachowiak
Re: HTML version issue summary? Karl Dubost
Re: HTML version issue summary? Karl Dubost
Re: survey of top web sites Benjamin West
Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much? Matthew Raymond
Re: survey of top web sites Karl Dubost

Sunday, 29 April 2007

RE: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review) Dailey, David P.
Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review) Karl Dubost
Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review) Maciej Stachowiak
Re: [suggestion] Allow DIV inside any element Kornel Lesinski
Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much? Mark Birbeck
Re: [suggestion] Allow DIV inside any element Schalk Neethling
Re: HTML version issue summary? Matthew Ratzloff
Re: [suggestion] Allow DIV inside any element Bruce Lawson
Re: Allow DIV inside any element Olivier GENDRIN
Re: task list Schalk Neethling
Re: [suggestion] Allow DIV inside any element Elliott Sprehn
Re: task list David Dailey
Re: Allow DIV inside any element Mallory Mollo
Re: [suggestion] Allow DIV inside any element Daniel Glazman
[suggestion] Allow DIV inside any element Marat Tanalin
Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal Doug Schepers
Re: Desing principles - Support World Languages example added Jirka Kosek
Re: Introduce <term> element Olivier GENDRIN
Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review) Murray Maloney
Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review) Murray Maloney
Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal Matthew Raymond
Re: Desing principles - Support World Languages example added Anne van Kesteren
Re: Desing principles - Support World Languages example added Jirka Kosek
Re: Desing principles - Support World Languages example added Jirka Kosek
Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal Daniel Glazman
Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal Maciej Stachowiak
Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal Maciej Stachowiak
Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal Maciej Stachowiak
Re: HTML version issue summary? Dannii
Re: HTML version issue summary? Preston L. Bannister
Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal Doug Schepers
Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal Preston L. Bannister
Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal John Boyer

Saturday, 28 April 2007

Re: HTML version issue summary? Matthew Ratzloff

Sunday, 29 April 2007

Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal John Boyer
Another look at the Proposed Design Principles Dailey, David P.
Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal Maciej Stachowiak
Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal Daniel Glazman
Re: Hand-coding HTML Daniel Glazman
Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal John Boyer
Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal Maciej Stachowiak

Saturday, 28 April 2007

Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review) Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review) Håkon Wium Lie
Re: missing principle Preston L. Bannister
Re: Hand-coding HTML (was: New html-element: table3) Patrick Taylor
Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal John Boyer
Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review) Murray Maloney
Re: Hand-coding HTML (was: New html-element: table3) Dylan Smith
Re: Pandering to poor authorship Sander Tekelenburg
Re: HTML version issue summary? Preston L. Bannister
Re: Versioning and the end user Matthew Ratzloff
Desing principles - Support World Languages example added Laurens Holst
Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review) Preston L. Bannister
Re: Proposed Design Principles review Murray Maloney
Re: Proposed Design Principles review Murray Maloney
Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal Maciej Stachowiak
Re: missing principle Smylers
Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer
Re: missing principle Smylers
Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal Maciej Stachowiak
Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal Dave Raggett
Re: missing principle Maciej Stachowiak
task list Schalk Neethling
Re: How to refer to place of document, which is not marked by author!? Maciej Stachowiak
Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal Anne van Kesteren
Re: missing principle Mike Schinkel
Re: How to refer to place of document, which is not marked by author!? Mike Schinkel
Re: Introduce <term> element Mike Schinkel
Re: missing principle Anne van Kesteren
Re: Versioning and the end user Mike Schinkel
Re: missing principle Mike Schinkel
Re: missing principle bhopgood@brookes.ac.uk
Hand-coding HTML (was: New html-element: table3) Mike Schinkel
Re: Pandering to poor authorship (was Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>) Mike Schinkel
Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review) Roger Johansson
Re: Proposed Design Principles updated Mike Schinkel
Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review) Roger Johansson
Re: How to refer to place of document, which is not marked by author!? Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering Mike Schinkel
Re: How to refer to place of document, which is not marked by author!? Mike Schinkel
Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal Mike Schinkel
Semantic vs. Presentational (was Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>) Mike Schinkel
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Mike Schinkel
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Mike Schinkel
Re: missing principle (small) Dylan Smith
Re: Proposed Design Principles review Dylan Smith

Friday, 27 April 2007

Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal Matthew Raymond
RE: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt Chris Wilson
Re: Proposed requirement: specification should provide enough detail to handle Web content Dailey, David P.
Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review) Brad Fults
Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review) Stephen Stewart
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt John Boyer
Re: Support Existing Content Elliott Sprehn
Re: [public-html] <none> Maciej Stachowiak
Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much? Mark Birbeck
Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much? Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Support Existing Content Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Proposed requirement: specification should provide enough detail to handle Web content Ian Hickson
HTML5 as our specification text for review? (formal question WBS survey) Dan Connolly
Re: missing principle Daniel Glazman
Re: missing principle Dan Connolly
Re: Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review) Roger Johansson
Re: missing principle bhopgood@brookes.ac.uk
Re: Proposed Design Principles review Debi Orton
Re: Proposed requirement: specification should provide enough detail to handle Web content Dan Connolly
Re: [public-html] <none> Gareth Hay
Re: [public-html] <none> Gareth Hay
Re: [public-html] <none> Smylers
Re: [public-html] <none> Jeff Cutsinger
Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much? bhopgood@brookes.ac.uk
Re: Support Existing Content Gareth Hay
Re: [public-html] <none> Smylers
Re: Support Existing Content Henri Sivonen
Re: [public-html] <none> Gareth Hay
Re: [public-html] <none> Denis Boudreau (WebConforme)
Re: [public-html] <none> Jeff Cutsinger
Re: Proposed Design Principles review Maurice
Re: [public-html] <none> Maurice
[public-html] <none> Gareth Hay
Re: Support Existing Content Lachlan Hunt
Re: Support Existing Content Smylers
Re: Support Existing Content Gareth Hay
Re: Support Existing Content Lachlan Hunt
Re: survey of top web sites Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Support Existing Content Jonas Sicking
Re: missing principle Smylers
Re: missing principle Maciej Stachowiak
Re: missing principle Daniel Glazman
Re: missing principle Karl Dubost
Re: missing principle Maciej Stachowiak
Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal Dave Raggett
missing principle Daniel Glazman
Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review) Doug Schepers
Design Principles Update Maciej Stachowiak
Proposed requirement: specification should provide enough detail to handle Web content L. David Baron
Re: Proposed Design Principles review Maciej Stachowiak
Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal -- from a proposed design principles point of view Henri Sivonen
Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much? Henri Sivonen
Re: Proposed Design Principles review Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Proposed Design Principles review Maciej Stachowiak
Design principles: added three examples Anne van Kesteren
Re: Proposed Design Principles review Lachlan Hunt
Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal -- from a proposed design principles point of view Anne van Kesteren
Re: Proposed Design Principles review Preston L. Bannister
Re: Proposed Design Principles review Doug Schepers
RE: About the Web Forms 2 proposal -- from a proposed design principles point of view Josh Sled
Re: Proposed Design Principles review Preston L. Bannister
Re: Proposed Design Principles review Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Proposed Design Principles review Dannii
Re: Proposed Design Principles review Doug Schepers
RE: About the Web Forms 2 proposal -- from a proposed design principles point of view Dailey, David P.
Re: Proposed Design Principles review Ian Hickson
Re: Proposed Design Principles review Lachlan Hunt
Re: Proposed Design Principles review Dannii
Re: HTML version issue summary? Matthew Raymond
Re: Proposed Design Principles review Karl Dubost
Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal -- from a proposed design principles point of view Matthew Raymond
Re: survey of top web sites Sean Fraser
RE: survey of top web sites Dailey, David P.
Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal Ian Hickson
Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much? Maciej Stachowiak
Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much? Mark Birbeck
Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much? Maciej Stachowiak
Re: survey of top web sites Sander Tekelenburg
Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much? Mark Birbeck
Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer

Thursday, 26 April 2007

Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much? Maciej Stachowiak
Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much? Mark Birbeck
Re: survey of top web sites Sander Tekelenburg
RE: HTML WG teleconference 2007-04-26 minutes for review Dailey, David P.
RE: About the Web Forms 2 proposal -- from a proposed design principles point of view Dailey, David P.
Re: Parsing of HTML fragments Maurice
Re: HTML WG teleconference 2007-04-26 minutes for review Maciej Stachowiak
Re: HTML WG teleconference 2007-04-26 minutes for review Dan Connolly
HTML WG teleconference 2007-04-26 minutes for review T.V Raman
Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much? Henri Sivonen
Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much? Mark Birbeck
Re: non-rectangular images & <img> tag Maurice
Re: RE: survey of top web sites Sean Fraser
Re: HTML WG teleconference 2007-04-26 minutes for review Henri Sivonen
Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype Henri Sivonen
RE: survey of top web sites Dan Connolly
Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much? Henri Sivonen
Re: Feature Strings Maurice
Re: new form control Maurice
HTML WG teleconference 2007-04-26 minutes for review Dan Connolly
Re: Proposed Design Principles review Anne van Kesteren
Re: About the Web Forms 2 proposal Ian Hickson
RE: survey of top web sites Dailey, David P.
Re: Proposed Design Principles review Jeff Schiller
RE: Proposed Design Principles review Dailey, David P.
Re: Proposed Design Principles review Arthur Jennings
Re: INPUT-PIC form control Thomas Broyer
Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype Daniel Spång
Re: survey of top web sites Nick Fitzsimons
RE: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much? Dailey, David P.
About the Web Forms 2 proposal Anne van Kesteren
Proposed Design Principles review Ian Hickson
Re: HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much? Sander van Lambalgen
Re: non-rectangular images & <img> tag Maurice
HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much? Preston L. Bannister
Re: survey of top web sites Sean Fraser
Re: HTML version issue summary? Sander Tekelenburg
scribe for today's teleconference? Dan Connolly
Re: Let use this convention for conversation Dan Connolly
Re: HTML version issue summary? Jeff Schiller
Dublin workshop on web authoring Dave Raggett
Re[2]: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: Re[2]: Fwd: Re[2]: New html-element: table3 Dmitry Turin
Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: Re[2]: Fwd: Re[2]: New html-element: table3 Dmitry Turin
Re: Separation of versioning concerns Asbjørn Ulsberg
Re: Re[2]: Fwd: Re[2]: New html-element: table3 Thomas Broyer
Re[2]: Fwd: Re[2]: New html-element: table3 Dmitry Turin
Re: HTML version issue summary? Dão Gottwald
Re: Fwd: Re[2]: New html-element: table3 Jonas Sicking
Re[4]: New html-element: table3 Dmitry Turin
Re[2]: Fwd: Re[2]: New html-element: table3 Dmitry Turin
INPUT-PIC form control Dmitry Turin
Re: Let use this convention for conversation Jonas Sicking
Let use this convention for conversation Dmitry Turin
Re: Fwd: Re[2]: New html-element: table3 Jonas Sicking
Fwd: Re[2]: New html-element: table3 Dmitry Turin
Fwd: Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: Re[2]: New html-element: table3 Dmitry Turin
Fwd: Re[4]: New html-element: table3 Dmitry Turin
Fwd: Re[2]: New html-element: table3 Dmitry Turin
Re: How to refer to place of document, which is not marked by author!? Henri Sivonen
How to refer to place of document, which is not marked by author!? Dmitry Turin

Wednesday, 25 April 2007

Re: Separation of versioning concerns Maciej Stachowiak

Thursday, 26 April 2007

Re: HTML version issue summary? Matthew Raymond

Wednesday, 25 April 2007

Re: Separation of versioning concerns Scott Turner
Re: Parsing of HTML fragments Scott Turner
Re: new form control Kornel Lesinski
Re: agenda: HTML WG teleconference 2007-04-26T17:00:00Z (invited participants) Dan Connolly
Re: agenda: HTML WG teleconference 2007-04-26T17:00:00Z Dan Connolly
Re: non-rectangular images & <img> tag Maciej Stachowiak
Re: survey of top web sites Sean Fraser
Re: survey of top web sites Benjamin West
Re: Separation of versioning concerns Matthew Ratzloff
Re: Parsing of HTML fragments James Graham
Re: Parsing of HTML fragments Marco Von Ballmoos
Re: HTML version issue summary? L. David Baron
Re: agenda: HTML WG teleconference 2007-04-26T17:00:00Z Gregory J. Rosmaita
Re: survey of top web sites David Dailey
Re: HTML version issue summary? Sander Tekelenburg
Re: HTML version issue summary? Sander Tekelenburg
agenda: HTML WG teleconference 2007-04-26T17:00:00Z Dan Connolly
Re: survey of top web sites Anne van Kesteren
Re: non-rectangular images & <img> tag Jeff Schiller
Re: Parsing of HTML fragments Asbjørn Ulsberg
Re: non-rectangular images & <img> tag David Dailey
Re: survey of top web sites David Dailey
Re: non-rectangular images & <img> tag Asbjørn Ulsberg
Re: Versioning of HTML fragments Asbjørn Ulsberg
Re: Versioning of HTML fragments Asbjørn Ulsberg
Re: Separation of versioning concerns Sam Ruby
Re: Separation of versioning concerns Thomas Broyer
Re: Separation of versioning concerns James Graham
Re: Separation of versioning concerns Eric Daspet
Re: HTML version issue summary? Jeff Schiller
Re: Separation of versioning concerns Henri Sivonen
Re: Separation of versioning concerns Dannii
Separation of versioning concerns Sam Ruby
Re: HTML version issue summary? Dão Gottwald
Re: HTML version issue summary? Matthew Raymond
Re: HTML version issue summary? Matthew Raymond
Re: HTML version issue summary? Dão Gottwald
Re: non-rectangular images & <img> tag Olivier GENDRIN
Re: HTML version issue summary? L. David Baron
Re: non-rectangular images & <img> tag Josef Spillner
Re: HTML version issue summary? David Hyatt
Re: HTML version issue summary? Jeff Schiller
Re: survey of top web sites Sean Fraser
Re: HTML version issue summary? David Hyatt
Re: tasks to supplement HTML specification development Simon Pieters
Re: HTML version issue summary? Matthew Raymond
Re: HTML version issue summary? Chasen Le Hara
Re: survey of top web sites Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Re: survey of top web sites Sean Fraser
Re: HTML version issue summary? David Hyatt
Re: HTML version issue summary? David Hyatt
Re: HTML version issue summary? Chasen Le Hara
Re: survey of top web sites Maciej Stachowiak
Re: HTML version issue summary? Maciej Stachowiak
Re: survey of top web sites Sean Fraser
Re: HTML version issue summary? Jonas Sicking
Re: HTML version issue summary? Dão Gottwald
Re: HTML version issue summary? Dannii
Re: HTML version issue summary? Dão Gottwald
Re: HTML version issue summary? David Hyatt
Re: HTML version issue summary? Maciej Stachowiak
Re: HTML version issue summary? Maciej Stachowiak
Re: HTML version issue summary? David Hyatt
Re: HTML version issue summary? David Hyatt
Re: HTML version issue summary? Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Parsing of HTML fragments Dão Gottwald
Re: HTML version issue summary? David Hyatt
Re: Parsing of HTML fragments Edward O'Connor
Re: Parsing of HTML fragments Edward O'Connor

Tuesday, 24 April 2007

Re: non-rectangular images & <img> tag Matthew Raymond
Re: Parsing of HTML fragments Preston L. Bannister
Re: Parsing of HTML fragments Ian Hickson
HTML version issue summary? Dan Connolly
Re: FAQ on joining the HTML WG as an Invited Expert Dan Connolly
survey of top web sites Dan Connolly
Re: Other roles we should fill (survey on tasks and roles) Dan Connolly
Re: Parsing of HTML fragments Dão Gottwald
Re: Parsing of HTML fragments Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Parsing of HTML fragments Dão Gottwald
Re: Parsing of HTML fragments Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Parsing of HTML fragments Sam Ruby
Re: Parsing of HTML fragments Edward O'Connor
Parsing of HTML fragments Geoffrey Sneddon
Re: Versioning of HTML fragments Marco Von Ballmoos
Re: Re[2]: New html-element: table3 Thomas Broyer
Re: FAQ on joining the HTML WG as an Invited Expert David Dailey
Re: Re[2]: New html-element: table3 Preston L. Bannister
Re: New html-element: table3 Preston L. Bannister
Re: New html-element: table3 Jonas Sicking
Re: new form control Matthew Ratzloff
Re: brainstorm: attributes as virtual tags Dão Gottwald
Re: brainstorm: attributes as virtual tags Dão Gottwald
Re[4]: new form control Dmitry Turin
FAQ on joining the HTML WG as an Invited Expert Dan Connolly
brainstorm: attributes as virtual tags Dmitry Turin
Re: non-rectangular images & <img> tag Olivier GENDRIN
Re: new form control Rene Saarsoo
Re[2]: New html-element: table3 Dmitry Turin
Re: New html-element: table3 Henri Sivonen
Re: BoF at XTech Anne van Kesteren
Re: BoF at XTech Olivier GENDRIN
New html-element: table3 Dmitry Turin
New html-element: table3 Dmitry Turin
Re: BoF at XTech James Graham
Re: BoF at XTech James Graham
Re: BoF at XTech Anne van Kesteren

Monday, 23 April 2007

Versioning of HTML fragments Sam Ruby

Tuesday, 24 April 2007

Re: BoF at XTech (was: Re: no HTML WG meeting around XTech) Karl Dubost
Re: HTML WG teleconference Thu 26 Apr 1700UTC (meeting call, survey) Dan Connolly
Re: HTML WG teleconference Thu 26 Apr 1700UTC (meeting call, survey) L. David Baron

Monday, 23 April 2007

Re: Re[2]: new form control Kornel Lesinski
Re: Now there is table-element with predetermined quantity of column.But sometimes we need to visualize three tables(for example, database tables) as one table:first table contains names of rows,second table contains names of columns (this table determine quantity of columns),third table contains data.New html-element: table-dim Jonas Sicking
non-rectangular images & <img> tag Dailey, David P.
BoF at XTech (was: Re: no HTML WG meeting around XTech) Henri Sivonen
Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype Dan Connolly
Re: HTML5 proposal response Ian Hickson
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt David Hyatt
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt David Hyatt
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt Dan Connolly
Re: Now there is table-element with predetermined quantity of column. But sometimes we need to visualize three tables (for example, database tables) as one table: first table contains names of rows, second table contains names of columns (this table Dão Gottwald
Re: Now there is table-element with predetermined quantity of column. But sometimes we need to visualize three tables (for example, database tables) as one table: first table contains names of rows, second table contains names of columns (this table Preston L. Bannister
RE: HTML5 proposal response Chris Wilson
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt Jeff Schiller
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Denis Boudreau (WebConforme)
Re: Issue Tracking Dão Gottwald
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt Schalk Neethling
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt Daniel Glazman
Re: HTML5 proposal response Olivier GENDRIN
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt James Graham
Re: HTML5 proposal response Daniel Glazman
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 (progress on recruiting editors) Daniel Glazman
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt David Dailey
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Dão Gottwald
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Daniel Glazman
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Daniel Glazman
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt Benjamin Chait
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Dão Gottwald
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Daniel Glazman
Re: Versioning and html[5] Daniel Glazman
Re: Versioning and html[5] Daniel Glazman
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Daniel Glazman
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Daniel Glazman
Re: Versioning and html[5] Daniel Glazman
Re: Versioning and html[5] Daniel Glazman
Re: Versioning and html[5] Daniel Glazman
Re: Feature Strings Bill Mason
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt paul haine
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt Maciej Stachowiak
Now there is table-element with predetermined quantity of column. Dmitry Turin
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt Benjamin Chait
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt Doug Schepers
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt Matthew Raymond
Re: Microsoft versioning proposal Matthew Raymond
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt Doug Schepers
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Feature Strings Matthew Raymond
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt Matthew Raymond
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt Matthew Raymond
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt Dylan Smith

Sunday, 22 April 2007

Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt Gregory J. Rosmaita
Other roles we should fill Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt Doug Schepers
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt Elliott Sprehn
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt Dailey, David P.
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt Maciej Stachowiak
Re: The argument for |bugmode| Roger Johansson
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Preston L. Bannister
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt Doug Schepers

Saturday, 21 April 2007

Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt Charles Ying

Sunday, 22 April 2007

Re: Microsoft versioning proposal Preston L. Bannister
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt Jeff Schiller
Re: The argument for |bugmode| Matthew Raymond

Saturday, 21 April 2007

Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Dão Gottwald
Re: The argument for |bugmode| Kornel Lesinski
Re: The argument for |bugmode| Terje Bless
Re: The argument for |bugmode| Matthew Raymond
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt Denis Boudreau (WebConforme)
Re: tasks to supplement HTML specification development Brad Fults
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate liorean
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt Patrick Taylor
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Dão Gottwald
Re: The argument for |bugmode| Dão Gottwald
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Matthew Raymond
Re: The argument for |bugmode| Terje Bless
Re: Introduce <term> element Laurens Holst
Re: The argument for |bugmode| Matthew Raymond
RE: The argument for |bugmode| Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt Arthur Jennings
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt Matthew Raymond
Re: Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt Maciej Stachowiak
Nomination for Co-Editor: Dave Hyatt Maciej Stachowiak

Friday, 20 April 2007

RE: The argument for |bugmode| Chris Wilson
RE: The argument for |bugmode| Chris Wilson
Re: new form control Kornel Lesinski
Re: The argument for |bugmode| Matthew Ratzloff
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> David Dailey
Re: The argument for |bugmode| Terje Bless
Re: tasks to supplement HTML specification development Bill Mason
Re: Editor and authors James Graham
Re: The argument for |bugmode| Terje Bless
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Alexander Graf
Re: Editor and authors Terje Bless
Re: The argument for |bugmode| Henri Sivonen
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Lachlan Hunt
Re: The argument for |bugmode| Patrick Taylor
Update on affiliation Alexander Graf
Re: new form control Dão Gottwald
Re: new form control Dão Gottwald
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Matthew Raymond
Re: The argument for |bugmode| Matthew Raymond
new form control Dmitry Turin
Re: Editor and authors Dão Gottwald
Re: Editor and authors Henri Sivonen
Re: The argument for |bugmode| Henri Sivonen
Re: Editor and authors Henrik Dvergsdal
Re: Feature Strings Smylers
Editor and authors Re: HTML5 proposal response Karl Dubost
Re: The argument for |bugmode| Maciej Stachowiak
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Lachlan Hunt
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Lachlan Hunt
Re: The argument for |bugmode| Terje Bless
Re: The argument for |bugmode| Lachlan Hunt
Re: The argument for |bugmode| Maciej Stachowiak
Re: The argument for |bugmode| Terje Bless
Re: HTML5 proposal response Maciej Stachowiak
Re: The argument for |bugmode| Matthew Ratzloff
Re: The argument for |bugmode| Matthew Raymond
Re: The argument for |bugmode| Matthew Raymond
RE: HTML5 proposal response Dailey, David P.

Thursday, 19 April 2007

Re: HTML5 proposal response Ian Hickson
HTML5 proposal response Chris Wilson
RE: The argument for |bugmode| Sander Tekelenburg
RE: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 (progress on recruiting editors) Håkon Wium Lie
Re: Feature Strings Jeff Schiller
RE: The argument for |bugmode| Håkon Wium Lie
Re: Feature Strings Ian Hickson
RE: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 (progress on recruiting editors) Chris Wilson
RE: The argument for |bugmode| Chris Wilson
RE: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Chris Wilson
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Dão Gottwald
RE: The argument for |bugmode| Chris Wilson
RE: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering Chris Wilson
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Sander van Lambalgen
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Christian Schmidt
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 (progress on recruiting editors) bhopgood@brookes.ac.uk
Re: The argument for |bugmode| Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Feature Strings Maciej Stachowiak
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Geoffrey Sneddon
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo
Re: Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Sean Fraser
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo
Re: Feature Strings Jeff Schiller
Feature Strings Jeff Schiller
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 (progress on recruiting editors) Brad Fults
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Magnus Kristiansen
Re: Issue Tracking (was: Proposal to Adopt HTML5) Olivier GENDRIN
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Dão Gottwald
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo
Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype Murray Maloney
Re: Request for Decision: Design Principles Murray Maloney
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 (progress on recruiting editors) Håkon Wium Lie
specification name [was: Proposal to Adopt HTML5] Dailey, David P.
Re: The argument for |bugmode| Matthew Raymond
Re: quality of authoring tools' output (was Versioning and html[5]) Dão Gottwald
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) James Graham
Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering Julian Reschke
Re: The argument for |bugmode| Sander Tekelenburg
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Patrick Taylor
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Henri Sivonen
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Lachlan Hunt
Re: Eolas vs. <object> Laurens Holst
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Anne van Kesteren
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Karl Dubost
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 (progress on recruiting editors) Dan Connolly
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Dylan Smith
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 (progress on recruiting editors) Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 (progress on recruiting editors) Dan Connolly
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Lachlan Hunt
RE: quality of authoring tools' output Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Sean Fraser
Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering Charles McCathieNevile
Re: Eolas vs. <object> Charles McCathieNevile
Re: Microsoft versioning proposal Dannii
Re: The argument for |bugmode| Lachlan Hunt
Issue Tracking (was: Proposal to Adopt HTML5) Doug Schepers
Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering Anne van Kesteren
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Lachlan Hunt
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Ian Hickson
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Maciej Stachowiak
Re: quality of authoring tools' output (was Versioning and html[5]) Elliott Sprehn

Wednesday, 18 April 2007

Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Olivier GENDRIN
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 (progress on recruiting editors) Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 (progress on recruiting editors) Dan Connolly
Re: HTML WG teleconference Thu 26 Apr 1700UTC (meeting call, survey) Dan Connolly
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Maciej Stachowiak
Re: HTML WG teleconference Thu 26 Apr 1700UTC (meeting call, survey) Ian Hickson
Re: Request for Decision: Design Principles Doug Schepers
RE: quality of authoring tools' output (was Versioning and html[5]) Dan Connolly
supplemental HTML WG orientation teleconference (same survey) Dan Connolly
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 James Graham
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Dan Connolly
RE: quality of authoring tools' output (was Versioning and html[5]) Sander Tekelenburg
HTML WG teleconference Thu 26 Apr 1700UTC (meeting call, survey) Dan Connolly
Re: Request for Decision: Design Principles Maciej Stachowiak
Re: several messages on versioning Ian Hickson
Re: Request for Decision: Design Principles Doug Schepers
Re: Request for Decision: HTML5 Proposal Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Request for Decision: HTML5 Proposal Dan Connolly
Re: Request for Decision: Design Principles Maciej Stachowiak
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Henri Sivonen
Re: Request for Decision: Design Principles Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Precision of <canvas> rendering (was: Re: Formal definition of HTML5) Henri Sivonen
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Michael A. Puls II
Re: Request for Decision: HTML5 Proposal Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Request for Decision: Design Principles Doug Schepers
about this mailing list Marvin Carlos
Re: Request for Decision: HTML5 Proposal Dan Connolly
Re: A Concrete Example for the HTML Versioning Debate Jonas Sicking
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo
Re: Request for Decision: HTML5 Proposal Denis Boudreau (WebConforme)
Re: Request for Decision: HTML5 Proposal Denis Boudreau (WebConforme)
Re: Request for Decision: HTML5 Proposal Sean Fraser
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Bill Mason
Re: Request for Decision: HTML5 Proposal Terje Bless
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo
RE: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Matthew Ratzloff
RE: Microsoft versioning proposal Chris Wilson
RE: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Chris Wilson
RE: Precision of <canvas> rendering (was: Re: Formal definition of HTML5) Chris Wilson
RE: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Chris Wilson

Tuesday, 17 April 2007

Re: RDFa Use Cases and Primer Working Drafts - Comments Welcome! ben@hedrington.com

Wednesday, 18 April 2007

Re: A Concrete Example for the HTML Versioning Debate Jeff Schiller
Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering liorean
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Michael A. Puls II
Re: Precision of <canvas> rendering (was: Re: Formal definition of HTML5) David Dailey
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Henri Sivonen
Re: A Concrete Example for the HTML Versioning Debate Henri Sivonen
Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering Julian Reschke
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Michael A. Puls II
Re: Introduce <term> element Olivier GENDRIN
Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering Magnus Kristiansen
Re: tasks to supplement HTML specification development Henrik Dvergsdal
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Matthew Raymond
Re: A Concrete Example for the HTML Versioning Debate Ian Hickson
Re: A Concrete Example for the HTML Versioning Debate Henrik Dvergsdal
Re: A Concrete Example for the HTML Versioning Debate Andrew Sidwell
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Dão Gottwald
Re: A Concrete Example for the HTML Versioning Debate Dão Gottwald
Re: Precision of <canvas> rendering (was: Re: Formal definition of HTML5) Henri Sivonen
Re: Perception of HTML5 (was Re: Formal definition of HTML5) Henrik Dvergsdal
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Roger Johansson
Re: The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Dannii
Re: A Concrete Example for the HTML Versioning Debate Jeff Schiller
Re: A Concrete Example for the HTML Versioning Debate Anne van Kesteren
Re: A Concrete Example for the HTML Versioning Debate Jeff Schiller
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Anne van Kesteren
Re: A Concrete Example for the HTML Versioning Debate Ian Hickson
static and dinamic schemes Dmitry Turin
Re: A Concrete Example for the HTML Versioning Debate Jeff Schiller
RE: Request for Decision: Design Principles Dailey, David P.
Re: A Concrete Example for the HTML Versioning Debate Ian Hickson
A Concrete Example for the HTML Versioning Debate Jeff Schiller
Re: Versioning and html[5] Karl Dubost
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Dylan Smith
Request for Decision: HTML5 Proposal Maciej Stachowiak
Request for Decision: Design Principles Maciej Stachowiak
Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate] Karl Dubost
Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering Dailey, David P.
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Karl Dubost
Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering Simon Pieters
RE: Eolas vs. <object> Dailey, David P.
Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering Anne van Kesteren
Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering Karl Dubost
The argument for |bugmode| (was Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype) Matthew Raymond
Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype Karl Dubost
Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype L. David Baron
Re: Microsoft versioning proposal Dannii
Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype Boris Zbarsky
Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype Murray Maloney
RE: Precision of <canvas> rendering (was: Re: Formal definition of HTML5) Dailey, David P.

Tuesday, 17 April 2007

Re: [XBL Primer] new scenarios John Boyer
Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate] Dão Gottwald
Re: Eolas vs. <object> Karl Dubost
Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate] Henk-Jan de Boer
Re: Microsoft versioning proposal Dão Gottwald
Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate] Henk-Jan de Boer
Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype David Håsäther
Re: Versioning and html[5] Dão Gottwald
Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype Matthew Ratzloff
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
Re: Perception of HTML5 (was Re: Formal definition of HTML5) Marcos Caceres
Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype Simon Pieters
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
RE: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype Chris Wilson
Re: Versioning and html[5] Dão Gottwald
Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype Doug Schepers
Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype Maciej Stachowiak
RE: Microsoft versioning proposal Chris Wilson
Re: Versioning and the end user Boris Zbarsky
Re: Versioning and the end user Maciej Stachowiak
RE: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype Chris Wilson
Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Perception of HTML5 (was Re: Formal definition of HTML5) Henrik Dvergsdal
RE: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate] Chris Wilson
RE: Versioning and the end user Chris Wilson
Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype Matthew Ratzloff
Re: If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype Jonas Sicking
Re: Versioning and the end user Matthew Ratzloff
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Dão Gottwald
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henri Sivonen
Re: Precision of <canvas> rendering (was: Re: Formal definition of HTML5) David Hyatt
Precision of <canvas> rendering (was: Re: Formal definition of HTML5) Henri Sivonen
RE: Versioning and html[5] Chris Wilson
RE: Versioning and html[5] Chris Wilson
If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the doctype Maciej Stachowiak
Eolas vs. <object> Jeff Schiller
Re: Versioning and html[5] Doug Schepers
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) liorean
Re: Versioning and html[5] Jonas Sicking
Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate] Bruce Boughton
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Roger Johansson
Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate] Dão Gottwald
Re: Versioning and the end user Boris Zbarsky
Re: Versioning and the end user Matthew Ratzloff
Re: Perception of HTML5 (was Re: Formal definition of HTML5) Maciej Stachowiak
Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate] Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Dão Gottwald
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Dão Gottwald
Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate] Dão Gottwald
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Boris Zbarsky
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) James Graham
Re: RDFa Use Cases and Primer Working Drafts - Comments Welcome! Dão Gottwald
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) liorean
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Boris Zbarsky
Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate] Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Dão Gottwald
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) James Graham
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) David Dailey
Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate] liorean
Re: RDFa Use Cases and Primer Working Drafts - Comments Welcome! David Dailey
RDFa Use Cases and Primer Working Drafts - Comments Welcome! Ben Adida
Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate] Dão Gottwald
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Dão Gottwald

Monday, 16 April 2007

Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Shane Thacker
Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate] Henk-Jan de Boer

Tuesday, 17 April 2007

Perception of HTML5 (was Re: Formal definition of HTML5) Henrik Dvergsdal
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Ian Hickson
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henri Sivonen
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Dannii
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henrik Dvergsdal
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Dão Gottwald
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Ian Hickson
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henrik Dvergsdal
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate cadunn
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Murray Maloney
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Dylan Smith
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Matthew Raymond
Re: Versioning and the end user Boris Zbarsky
Versioning and the end user Preston L. Bannister

Monday, 16 April 2007

Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis

Tuesday, 17 April 2007

Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Ian Hickson
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henrik Dvergsdal
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henrik Dvergsdal
Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering T.V Raman

Monday, 16 April 2007

Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering David Hyatt
Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering Maciej Stachowiak
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Bruce Boughton
Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering Bruce Boughton
Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering T.V Raman
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate cadunn
Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering Murray Maloney
Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering Murray Maloney
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Ian Hickson
RE: Versioning and html[5] Ian Hickson
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 Terje Bless
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Dão Gottwald
RE: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Ian Hickson
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Dão Gottwald
Re: Versioning and html[5] Arthur Jennings
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Ian Hickson
Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering David Hyatt
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Ian Hickson
Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering Murray Maloney
Re: Versioning and html[5] Maciej Stachowiak
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate liorean
Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering Murray Maloney
RE: Versioning and html[5] Chris Wilson
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Joe D'Andrea
Re: Versioning and html[5] Kornel Lesinski
Re: Non-goal for HTML: A Graphics API Ariel Perez
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Dan Connolly
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) David Dailey
Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering David Hyatt
Re: Pandering to poor authorship (was Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>) Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Non-goal for HTML: A Graphics API Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Aphorisms of First Principle [was Proposed Design Principles] David Dailey
Non-goal for HTML: A Graphics API Murray Maloney
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Jeff Cutsinger
RE: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) T.V Raman
Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering Murray Maloney
RE: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Chris Wilson
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Doug Schepers
usability testing [was: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>] David Dailey
RE: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) T.V Raman
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henri Sivonen
RE: Versioning and html[5] Joe D'Andrea
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) James Graham
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Julian Reschke
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henrik Dvergsdal
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henrik Dvergsdal
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Dannii

Sunday, 15 April 2007

RE: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Philip Taylor
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate aurélien levy

Monday, 16 April 2007

Re: [whatwg] Video proposals Matthew Raymond
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Dão Gottwald
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Henri Sivonen
Re: Pandering to poor authorship (was Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>) Dão Gottwald
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Dão Gottwald
Re: Pandering to poor authorship (was Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>) Dão Gottwald
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Dão Gottwald
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Henri Sivonen
Re: Pandering to poor authorship (was Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>) Mike Schinkel
Re: Versioning and html[5] Mike Schinkel
Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate] James Graham
Re: Pandering to poor authorship (was Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>) Dão Gottwald
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Mike Schinkel
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Dão Gottwald
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Mike Schinkel
Re: Pandering to poor authorship (was Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>) Mike Schinkel
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Mike Schinkel
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Mike Schinkel
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Anne van Kesteren
Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate] Anne van Kesteren
Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate] Anne van Kesteren
Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate] Lachlan Hunt
Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate] Anne van Kesteren
Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate] Maciej Stachowiak
Re: HTML/XHTML Anne van Kesteren
RE: Versioning and html[5] Chris Wilson
Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate] Preston L. Bannister
RE: Versioning and html[5] Ian Hickson
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Murray Maloney
RE: Versioning and html[5] Dailey, David P.
RE: Versioning and html[5] Dave Raggett
RE: Versioning and html[5] Ian Hickson
RE: Versioning and html[5] Dave Raggett
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Ian Hickson

Sunday, 15 April 2007

Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Maciej Stachowiak
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Lachlan Hunt
Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate] Maciej Stachowiak
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Lachlan Hunt
Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate] Henrik Dvergsdal
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
Re: Aphorisms of First Principle [was Proposed Design Principles] Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Versioning and html[5] Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Versioning and html[5] Maciej Stachowiak
Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate] Alexander Graf
Re: Versioning and html[5] Maciej Stachowiak
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Sean Fraser
Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate] Preston L. Bannister
Re: Versioning and html[5] Boris Zbarsky
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Murray Maloney
Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate] Sean Fraser
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Henri Sivonen
Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate] Denis Boudreau (WebConforme)
Re: legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate] Roger Johansson
Re: Versioning and html[5] Dão Gottwald
Re: Versioning and html[5] Dão Gottwald
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Lachlan Hunt
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henrik Dvergsdal
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Denis Boudreau (WebConforme)
legacy of incompetence? [was: a compromise to the versioning debate] Dailey, David P.
Re: Versioning and html[5] Denis Boudreau (WebConforme)
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
oops Chris Wilson
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Joe D'Andrea
Re: Versioning and html[5] Matthew Raymond
How frozen is frozen? Kornel Lesinski
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henri Sivonen
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henri Sivonen
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henrik Dvergsdal
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Magnus Kristiansen
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Alexander Graf
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Bruce Boughton
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Kornel Lesinski
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Mihai Sucan
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Roger Johansson
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Alexander Graf
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Bruce Boughton
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Lachlan Hunt
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Bruce Boughton
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henri Sivonen
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Mihai Sucan
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henri Sivonen
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Bruce Boughton
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henri Sivonen
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Bruce Boughton
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Mihai Sucan
RE: Versioning and html[5] Håkon Wium Lie
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henrik Dvergsdal
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate cadunn
Re: A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Michael A. Puls II
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henri Sivonen
RE: Versioning and html[5] Sander Tekelenburg
A Compromise to the Versioning Debate Lachlan Hunt
Re: Opt-in solutions ...and problems Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Pandering to poor authorship (was Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>) Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Introduce <term> element Preston L. Bannister
RE: Versioning and html[5] Ian Hickson
RE: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Dailey, David P.
Re: Patents and public (was: RE: Proposal to Adopt HTML5) Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Versioning and html[5] Maciej Stachowiak
RE: Patents and public Chris Wilson
RE: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Ian Hickson
RE: Versioning and html[5] Chris Wilson
RE: Versioning and html[5] Chris Wilson
Re: Versioning and html[5] Matthew Raymond
Re: Versioning and html[5] Lachlan Hunt
Re: Versioning and html[5] Matthew Raymond
Re: Versioning and html[5] Mike Schinkel
Re: Versioning and html[5] Bruce Boughton
RE: Versioning and html[5] Chris Wilson
RE: Versioning and html[5] Chris Wilson
RE: Versioning and html[5] Chris Wilson
Re: Versioning and html[5] Alexander Graf
RE: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Chris Wilson
RE: Versioning and html[5] Chris Wilson
Re: Pandering to poor authorship (was Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>) Mike Schinkel
Re: Versioning and html[5] Mike Schinkel
Re: Versioning and html[5] Mike Schinkel

Saturday, 14 April 2007

Re: Versioning and html[5] Mike Schinkel
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Mike Schinkel
RE: Versioning and html[5] Chris Wilson
Re: Versioning and html[5] Alexander Graf
Re: Versioning and html[5] Alexander Graf
Re: Versioning and html[5] Håkon Wium Lie
Re: Versioning and html[5] Dylan Smith
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henrik Dvergsdal
Re: Pandering to poor authorship (was Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>) Dylan Smith
Re: Versioning and html[5] Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Versioning and html[5] Mike Schinkel
Re: Versioning and html[5] Mike Schinkel
Re: Versioning and html[5] Mike Schinkel
Re: HTML/XHTML Henri Sivonen
Re: Versioning and html[5] Joe D'Andrea
Re: Versioning and html[5] Jirka Kosek
Re: Current working draft Benjamin Chait
RE: Current working draft Dailey, David P.
Re: Versioning and html[5] Matthew Raymond
Current working draft Schalk Neethling
Re: Versioning and html[5] Matthew Raymond
Re: HTML/XHTML liorean
HTML/XHTML Schalk Neethling
taking threads to www-archive or offline altogether Dan Connolly
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Murray Maloney
Re: Version information Dan Connolly
Re: Version information David Håsäther

Friday, 13 April 2007

Re: Versioning and html[5] Kornel Lesinski

Saturday, 14 April 2007

Re: Version information Murray Maloney
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
Re: Patents and public Matthew Raymond
Re: Versioning and html[5] Bruce Boughton
Re: Versioning and html[5] Ben Ward
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henri Sivonen
Re: Versioning and html[5] Lachlan Hunt
Re: Versioning and html[5] Dão Gottwald
Re: Versioning and html[5] Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henri Sivonen
Re: Versioning and html[5] Dão Gottwald
Re: Versioning and html[5] Matt Freels
Re: Versioning and html[5] Matt Freels
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henri Sivonen
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Mike Schinkel
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Mike Schinkel
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Roger Johansson
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henrik Dvergsdal
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Mike Schinkel
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Mike Schinkel
Re: Aphorisms of First Principle [was Proposed Design Principles] Mike Schinkel
Re: Patents and public Mike Schinkel
Re: Pandering to poor authorship (was Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>) Mike Schinkel
Re: Level of specification detail Mike Schinkel
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Mike Schinkel
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Mike Schinkel
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Mike Schinkel
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Mike Schinkel
Re: Version information Mike Schinkel
Re: Versioning and html[5] Mike Schinkel
Re: Versioning and html[5] Mike Schinkel
Re: Versioning and html[5] Mike Schinkel
Re: Versioning and html[5] Mike Schinkel
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Mike Schinkel
Re: Versioning and html[5] Lachlan Hunt
Re: Versioning and html[5] Lachlan Hunt
Re: Versioning and html[5] Boris Zbarsky
Re: Versioning and html[5] Boris Zbarsky
Re: Versioning and html[5] Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Versioning and html[5] Maciej Stachowiak

Friday, 13 April 2007

Re: Versioning and html[5] Matthew Ratzloff
Re: Versioning and html[5] Bruce Boughton
RE: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Ian Hickson
RE: Versioning and html[5] Ian Hickson
Re: Versioning and html[5] Dão Gottwald
Re: Versioning and html[5] Arthur Jennings
RE: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Chris Wilson
RE: Versioning and html[5] Chris Wilson
Re: Versioning and html[5] Geoffrey Sneddon
Re: Versioning and html[5] Matthew Ratzloff
RE: Versioning and html[5] Chris Wilson
RE: Versioning and html[5] Chris Wilson
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Ian Hickson
RE: Versioning and html[5] Chris Wilson
Re: Versioning and html[5] Arthur Jennings
RE: Versioning and html[5] Chris Wilson
RE: Versioning and html[5] Matthew Ratzloff
RE: Level of specification detail (Was Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5) Chris Wilson
RE: Versioning and html[5] Chris Wilson
Re: denying users direct access to document source Anne van Kesteren
denying users direct access to document source Gregory J. Rosmaita
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henrik Dvergsdal
User Agent (browser) WG at W3C [was: New discussion group are need] Gregory J. Rosmaita
Microsoft versioning proposal Anne van Kesteren
RE: Versioning and html[5] Chris Wilson
RE: Level of specification detail (Was Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5) Chris Wilson
RE: Versioning and html[5] Chris Wilson
RE: Versioning and html[5] Chris Wilson
RE: Versioning and html[5] Chris Wilson
RE: Versioning and html[5] Chris Wilson
RE: Versioning and html[5] Chris Wilson
RE: Versioning and html[5] Chris Wilson
RE: Intent to Conform (was Re: Version information) Chris Wilson
RE: Patents and public (was: RE: Proposal to Adopt HTML5) Chris Wilson
Re: Versioning and html[5] James Graham
Re: Versioning and html[5] Lachlan Hunt
Re: Version information Lachlan Hunt
Re: New discussion group are need Dmitry Turin
Re: Version information Murray Maloney
Re: New discussion group are need Olivier GENDRIN
Re: New discussion group are need James Graham
New discussion group are need Dmitry Turin
Re[2]: special immediate form: TREE Dmitry Turin
RE: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 mikko.honkala@nokia.com

Wednesday, 11 April 2007

RE: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 mikko.honkala@nokia.com

Friday, 13 April 2007

special immediate form: SELECT (LOOKER) Dmitry Turin
Re: special immediate form: TREE special immediate form: TREE special immediate form: TREE Bruce Boughton
special immediate form: TREE special immediate form: TREE special immediate form: TREE Dmitry Turin
Re: small consultation Bruce Boughton
small consultation Dmitry Turin
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henrik Dvergsdal
Re: wg members status stefan2904
Re: Opt-in solutions ...and problems (was Re: Versioning and html[5]) Simon Pieters
Re: Versioning and html[5] Geoffrey Sneddon
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Ian Hickson
Re: Opt-in solutions ...and problems (was Re: Versioning and html[5]) Bruce Boughton
Re: Versioning and html[5] Mihai Sucan
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Anne van Kesteren
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henri Sivonen
Re: Versioning and html[5] Dave Raggett
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henrik Dvergsdal
regrets Daniel Glazman
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Anne van Kesteren
Re: Versioning and html[5] Dão Gottwald
Re: Versioning and html[5] Laurens Holst
Re: Versioning and html[5] Ian Hickson
Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Ian Hickson
Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information) Henrik Dvergsdal
Re: Mask in string of address Laurens Holst
Mask in string of address Dmitry Turin
Re: Versioning and html[5] Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Opt-in solutions ...and problems (was Re: Versioning and html[5]) Dão Gottwald
Re: Versioning and html[5] Dão Gottwald
Re: Versioning and html[5] Dão Gottwald
Re: Versioning and html[5] Lachlan Hunt
Re: Version information Henri Sivonen
Re: Versioning and html[5] Dão Gottwald
Re: Version information Henrik Dvergsdal
are necessary tag PACK ? Dmitry Turin
Re: Versioning and html[5] Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Version information Lachlan Hunt
Re: Versioning and html[5] Henri Sivonen
Re: Versioning and html[5] Boris Zbarsky
Re: Versioning and html[5] Laurens Holst
Aphorisms of First Principle [was Proposed Design Principles] Dailey, David P.
Re: Opt-in solutions ...and problems (was Re: Versioning and html[5]) Benjamin Chait
Opt-in solutions ...and problems (was Re: Versioning and html[5]) Matthew Ratzloff
Re: Level of specification detail (Was Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5) Benjamin West
Re: Level of specification detail (Was Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5) Dan Connolly
Re: Versioning and html[5] Ian Hickson
Re: Versioning and html[5] Karl Dubost

Thursday, 12 April 2007

Re: wg members status Davide Oliva

Friday, 13 April 2007

Re: Versioning and html[5] Simon Pieters
Re: Level of specification detail (Was Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5) Dylan Smith
Re: Pandering to poor authorship (was Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>) Dylan Smith

Thursday, 12 April 2007

RE: Versioning and html[5] Ian Hickson
RE: Versioning and html[5] Håkon Wium Lie
Re: Versioning and html[5] Bruce Boughton
Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
RE: Versioning and html[5] Chris Wilson
Re: Deviance from SGML (was Re: Version information) Ian Hickson
Re: Version information Ian Hickson
Deviance from SGML (was Re: Version information) Henrik Dvergsdal
RE: Versioning and html[5] Ian Hickson
RE: Intent to Conform (was Re: Version information) Chris Wilson
RE: Versioning and html[5] Chris Wilson
RE: Versioning and html[5] Chris Wilson
Re: Version information Eric Daspet
RE: Versioning and html[5] Chris Wilson
RE: Versioning and html[5] Chris Wilson
Re: Versioning and html[5] David Håsäther
Re: Version information Simon Pieters
RE: Versioning and html[5] Chris Wilson
Re: Versioning and html[5] Schalk Neethling
Re: Version information Henrik Dvergsdal
Re: Version information Simon Pieters
Re: Version information Ian Hickson
Re: Version information ryan
Re: Patents and public (was: RE: Proposal to Adopt HTML5) Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Version information Henrik Dvergsdal
Re: Version information Simon Pieters
Re: Version information David Håsäther
Re: Version information Ian Hickson
Re: Version information Henrik Dvergsdal
Re: Version information David Håsäther
Re: Version information Henrik Dvergsdal
Re: Versioning and html[5] Ian Hickson
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Dão Gottwald
Re: Intent to Conform (was Re: Version information) Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Versioning and html[5] Dão Gottwald
Re: Versioning and html[5] Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo
<object> attributes (Was: Versioning and html[5]) Ian Hickson
Re: Versioning and html[5] Henri Sivonen
Re: Level of specification detail (Was Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5) Nick Drago
Re: Versioning and html[5] James Graham
Re: Versioning and html[5] Simon Pieters
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 (patent policy FAQ)) Dan Connolly
Re: Intent to Conform (was Re: Version information) Boris Zbarsky
Re: Intent to Conform (was Re: Version information) L. David Baron
Re: Versioning and html[5] Dave Raggett
Re: Versioning and html[5] Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Versioning and html[5] Boris Zbarsky
RE: Intent to Conform (was Re: Version information) Chris Wilson
Patents and public (was: RE: Proposal to Adopt HTML5) Chris Wilson
Re: Intent to Conform (was Re: Version information) Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Versioning and html[5] Henri Sivonen
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Rene Saarsoo
Re: wg members status Ariel Perez
Re: wg members status Razvan MIHAIU
RE: Versioning and html[5] Chris Wilson
Versioning and html[5] Chris Wilson
RE: Intent to Conform (was Re: Version information) Chris Wilson
Re: Level of specification detail Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Alternate HTML 5 adoption proposal? Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Matthew Raymond
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 James Graham
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Dao Gottwald
RE: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Ben Meadowcroft
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Dao Gottwald
Re[2]: brainstorm: repeating form controls Dmitry Turin
Re: Pandering to poor authorship (was Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>) Bruce Boughton
Re: Level of specification detail Anne van Kesteren
Re: Design Principles updated Henri Sivonen
Re: Level of specification detail (Was Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5) liorean
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Joe D'Andrea
Re: tasks to supplement HTML specification development Zdenko Vujasinović
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Laurens Holst
Re: Design Principles updated Laurens Holst
Re: Design Principles updated Henri Sivonen
Re: Intent to Conform (was Re: Version information) Laurens Holst
Re: Pandering to poor authorship (was Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote>) Dylan Smith
Re: Level of specification detail Dylan Smith
Re: Design Principles updated Laurens Holst
Design Principles updated Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Organization Weakness Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Ian Hickson
Re: Organization Weakness Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Maciej Stachowiak
Organization Weakness Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Karl Dubost
Re: splitting HTML5 into chunks Michael A. Puls II
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Bruce Boughton
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Mike Schinkel
Re: Level of specification detail (Was Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5) Mike Schinkel
Re: Level of specification detail (Was Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5) Mike Schinkel
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Bruce Boughton
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Mike Schinkel
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Mike Schinkel
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Ian Hickson
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Mike Schinkel
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Mike Schinkel
Re: splitting HTML5 into chunks Philip Taylor
Re: Level of specification detail (Was Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5) Karl Dubost

Wednesday, 11 April 2007

Re: wg members status Nick Drago

Thursday, 12 April 2007

Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 -- procedural issue Karl Dubost
Canvas testing Re: tasks to supplement HTML specification development Karl Dubost

Wednesday, 11 April 2007

Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Arthur Jennings
Re: splitting HTML5 into chunks [was: Proposal to Adopt HTML5] Michael A. Puls II
Re: wg members status Michael A. Puls II
splitting HTML5 into chunks [was: Proposal to Adopt HTML5] Dan Connolly
Re: tasks to supplement HTML specification development Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Ian Hickson
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Alternate HTML 5 adoption proposal? (Was Re: Level of specification detail) Matthew Ratzloff
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Ian Hickson
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Bruce Boughton
Re: Alternate HTML 5 adoption proposal? (Was Re: Level of specification detail) Henri Sivonen
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Benjamin Chait
Re: wg members status Benjamin Chait
Re: Alternate HTML 5 adoption proposal? (Was Re: Level of specification detail) Matthew Ratzloff
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Ian Hickson
Re: Level of specification detail (Was Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5) Maciej Stachowiak
Re: wg members status stefan2904
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Zdenko Vujasinović
Re: wg members status Ariel Perez
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Josef Spillner
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Sylvain Eliade
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Philip Taylor
Re: tasks to supplement HTML specification development Benjamin Chait
Re: wg members status Ariel Perez
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 -- procedural issue Lachlan Hunt
Re: Alternate HTML 5 adoption proposal? (Was Re: Level of specification detail) Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Henri Sivonen
Re: tasks to supplement HTML specification development David Håsäther
Re: tasks to supplement HTML specification development Sean Fraser
Re: Alternate HTML 5 adoption proposal? (Was Re: Level of specification detail) Henri Sivonen
Alternate HTML 5 adoption proposal? (Was Re: Level of specification detail) Matthew Ratzloff
Re: Level of specification detail (Was Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5) ryan
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 -- procedural issue Denis Boudreau (WebConforme)
Re: brainstorm: lines and existing html-elements David Dailey
tasks to supplement HTML specification development Dan Connolly
Re: Level of specification detail (Was Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5) Dan Connolly
Care with subject lines and threads [was: Proposal to Adopt ...] Dan Connolly
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 -- procedural issue Dan Connolly
access to client-side files [was: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 -- procedural issue] David Dailey
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Laurens Holst
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Laurens Holst
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Laurens Holst
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Geoffrey Sneddon
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Anne van Kesteren
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Laurens Holst
Re: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group Matthew Raymond
brainstorm: lines and existing html-elements Dmitry Turin
Re: wg members status Daniel Glazman
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Geoffrey Sneddon
Re: Level of specification detail (Was Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5) Anne van Kesteren
Re: wg members status Henrik Dvergsdal
Level of specification detail (Was Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5) Henrik Dvergsdal
Re: wg members status Andy Hume
Re: wg members status Maciej Stachowiak
Re: wg members status Ian Hickson
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 -- procedural issue Cameron McCormack
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 -- procedural issue Maciej Stachowiak
wg members status Daniel Glazman
Re: Introduce <term> element Elliott Sprehn
Re: Introduce <term> element Mallory Mollo
RE: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 -- procedural issue Ian Hickson
RE: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 -- procedural issue Dailey, David P.
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Daniel Glazman
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Matthew Raymond

Tuesday, 10 April 2007

Re: abbreviations in canonical HTML (thoughts & concrete suggestions) John McKenzie

Wednesday, 11 April 2007

Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Dan Connolly
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Kai Hendry

Tuesday, 10 April 2007

Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Dan Connolly
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 -- procedural issue Dan Connolly
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Henrik Dvergsdal
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Niko Neugebauer
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Ian Hickson
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Charles McCathieNevile
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Ian Hickson
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 James Graham
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Elliott Sprehn
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Elliott Sprehn
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Rimantas Liubertas
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Anne van Kesteren
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 David McFarland
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Carol King
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 deres
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 cadunn
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Roger Johansson
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Roger Johansson
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Anne van Kesteren
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 David Hyatt
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Henri Sivonen
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Boris Zbarsky
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Henrik Dvergsdal
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Henrik Dvergsdal
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Henrik Dvergsdal
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Anne van Kesteren
RE: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Chris Wilson
RE: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Chris Wilson
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Ian Hickson
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 L. David Baron
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Anne van Kesteren
RE: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Robert Brodrecht
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Henri Sivonen
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Henrik Dvergsdal
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 James Graham
RE: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Matthew Ratzloff
RE: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Håkon Wium Lie
RE: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 David Dailey
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Daniel Glazman
RE: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Chris Wilson
RE: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Chris Wilson
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Craig Saila
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 paul haine
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Doug Schepers
Re: Overall strategy (Was Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5) Henrik Dvergsdal
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Denis Boudreau (WebConforme)
RE: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 -- procedural issue Dailey, David P.
Re: Overall strategy Ian Hickson
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Shawn Medero
Re: Overall strategy (Was Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5) Maciej Stachowiak
Overall strategy (Was Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5) Henrik Dvergsdal
Re: innerHTML and setTimeout liorean
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Daniel Schattenkirchner
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Geoffrey Sneddon
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Dao Gottwald
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Henrik Dvergsdal
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Anne van Kesteren
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Karl Dubost
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Lachlan Hunt

Monday, 9 April 2007

Re: beforeprint event Andy Hume

Tuesday, 10 April 2007

Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Raven Brooks
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Daniel Glazman
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Dao Gottwald
Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Doug Jones
Re: innerHTML and setTimeout Dao Gottwald
Proposal to Adopt HTML5 Maciej Stachowiak
RE: innerHTML and setTimeout Dailey, David P.

Monday, 9 April 2007

Re: innerHTML and setTimeout Lachlan Hunt
Re: Introduce <term> element Doug Jones
Re: innerHTML and setTimeout Charles McCathieNevile
Re: innerHTML and setTimeout Schalk Neethling
Re: innerHTML and setTimeout Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Canvas Anne van Kesteren
RE: beforeprint event Chris Wilson
Re: innerHTML and setTimeout Dao Gottwald
Re: innerHTML and setTimeout Dao Gottwald
Re: beforeprint event Dao Gottwald
Re: Version information Anne van Kesteren
Re: Version information Henrik Dvergsdal
Re: Canvas Doug Schepers
Re: innerHTML and setTimeout liorean
Re: innerHTML and setTimeout Dao Gottwald
Re: Intent to Conform (was Re: Version information) Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Version information M. Jackson Wilkinson
RE: Intent to Conform (was Re: Version information) Chris Wilson
Intent to Conform (was Re: Version information) Maciej Stachowiak
innerHTML and setTimeout David Dailey
RE: beforeprint event Chris Wilson
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Alexander Graf
Re: Version information Anne van Kesteren
Re: Version information Henrik Dvergsdal
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Alexander Graf
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Dao Gottwald
Re: beforeprint event Dao Gottwald
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Mike Schinkel
Re: brainstorm: repeating form controls Henri Sivonen
brainstorm: alternative form controls Dmitry Turin
brainstorm: repeating form controls Dmitry Turin
Re: beforeprint event Anne van Kesteren
Re: Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Dao Gottwald
Re: beforeprint event Dao Gottwald
Re: Introduce <term> element Mike Schinkel
Re: Use the role-attribute instead of predefined class names Mike Schinkel
Proposing <indent> vs. <blockquote> Mike Schinkel
beforeprint event (was: Re: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group) Anne van Kesteren
Re: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group Dao Gottwald
Re: Mandated Video Format Mike Schinkel
Re: The HTMLWG and WHATWG (Was: Default (informal) Style Sheet) Mike Schinkel
Re: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group Matthew Raymond
RE: Version information Ian Hickson
Re: Version information Magnus Kristiansen
RE: Version information Chris Wilson
RE: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group Chris Wilson
RE: Version information Chris Wilson
RE: Version information Chris Wilson
Re: Canvas Karl Dubost

Sunday, 8 April 2007

Semantics is not semantics (was: HTML WG Glossary) Preston L. Bannister
Re: <table> terse mode for data entry Preston L. Bannister
Re: <table> terse mode for data entry Elliott Sprehn
Re: Canvas Dao Gottwald
Re: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group Matthew Raymond
<table> terse mode for data entry Dailey, David P.
HTML WG Glossary Doug Jones
Re: <table type="rowsortable"> Bruce Boughton
Re: rel=noreferrer Rick Mans
Re: Canvas Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Canvas Laurens Holst
Re: rel=noreferrer Dao Gottwald
Re: Version information Dao Gottwald
Re: Canvas Laurens Holst
rel=noreferrer Robert Accettura
Re: Use the role-attribute instead of predefined class names Matthew Raymond
Re: <table type="rowsortable"> Preston L. Bannister
RE: Use the role-attribute instead of predefined class names Dailey, David P.
VP3 as the Mandated Video Format? Matthew Raymond
Canvas [was RE: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group] Dailey, David P.
Re: Use the role-attribute instead of predefined class names Matthew Raymond
Re: Use the role-attribute instead of predefined class names Matthew Raymond
RE: <table type="rowsortable"> Dailey, David P.
Re: Canvas Andrew Fedoniouk

Saturday, 7 April 2007

Re: Version information Lachlan Hunt
Re: Version information Michael A. Puls II
Re: Version information Dao Gottwald
RE: Version information Chris Wilson
Re: [whatwg] Default (informal) Style Sheet Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Use the role-attribute instead of predefined class names Dao Gottwald
Re: [whatwg] Default (informal) Style Sheet Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo
Re: [whatwg] Default (informal) Style Sheet Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Use the role-attribute instead of predefined class names Laurens Holst
Re: [whatwg] Default (informal) Style Sheet Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo
Re: [whatwg] Default (informal) Style Sheet Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Use the role-attribute instead of predefined class names Matthew Raymond
Re: Use the role-attribute instead of predefined class names Laurens Holst
Re: Version information Laurens Holst
Re: Version information Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo
RE: Version information Håkon Wium Lie
Re: Canvas Doug Schepers
Re: Version information Anne van Kesteren
Re: Version information Ian Hickson
Re: Version information Lachlan Hunt
Re: Version information Boris Zbarsky
Re: Version information L. David Baron

Friday, 6 April 2007

RE: Version information Chris Wilson
Re: Version information Elliott Sprehn
Re: Version information Maciej Stachowiak
RE: Version information Ian Hickson
RE: Version information Chris Wilson
Re: CSS for print (was: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group) Håkon Wium Lie
Re: Canvas Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Canvas David Hyatt
Re: Canvas David Hyatt
Re: Canvas Doug Schepers
Re: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group Andy Hume
RE: Canvas Ian Hickson
Re: Canvas Andrew Fedoniouk
RE: Version information Ian Hickson
RE: Mandated Video Format Robert Brodrecht
Re: Canvas (was: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group) Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Version information Maciej Stachowiak
<canvas> (was Re: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group) Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Canvas Doug Schepers
Re: Canvas (was: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group) Andrew Fedoniouk
RE: Canvas Chris Wilson
RE: CSS for print Håkon Wium Lie
RE: Version information Chris Wilson
Re: Canvas Anne van Kesteren
Re: Version information Anne van Kesteren
Canvas (was: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group) Doug Schepers
RE: CSS for print (was: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group) Chris Wilson
RE: Version information (was Re: HTML5 vs HTML6) Chris Wilson
RE: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group Chris Wilson
Re: Mandated Video Format Preston L. Bannister
RE: Mandated Video Format Chris Wilson
Re: Mandated Video Format Robert Brodrecht
Re: Mandated Video Format Doug Schepers
RE: Mandated Video Format Dailey, David P.
RE: Mandated Video Format Dan Connolly
Re: CSS for print (was: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group) Dave Raggett
CSS for print (was: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group) Håkon Wium Lie
Re: Use the role-attribute instead of predefined class names Matthew Raymond
Re: Use the role-attribute instead of predefined class names Maciej Stachowiak
Re: [whatwg] Default (informal) Style Sheet Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo
Re: Use the role-attribute instead of predefined class names Olivier GENDRIN
Re: [whatwg] Default (informal) Style Sheet Anne van Kesteren
Re: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group Dave Raggett
Re: Mandated Video Format Henri Sivonen
Re: Mandated Video Format Robert Brodrecht
Re: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group Matthew Raymond
Re: Why <video>? (was Re: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group) Elliott Sprehn

Thursday, 5 April 2007

Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML Charles Hinshaw

Friday, 6 April 2007

Why <video>? (was Re: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group) Maciej Stachowiak
Re: DefaultStyleSheet05: (was Default (informal) Style Sheet) Sander Tekelenburg
Re: [whatwg] Default (informal) Style Sheet Sander Tekelenburg
Re: [whatwg] Default (informal) Style Sheet Sander Tekelenburg
Re: [whatwg] Default (informal) Style Sheet Sander Tekelenburg
Version information (was Re: HTML5 vs HTML6) L. David Baron

Thursday, 5 April 2007

Re: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Mandated Video Format Henri Sivonen
RE: Mandated Video Format (was: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group) Håkon Wium Lie
Re: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group Doug Schepers
RE:Re: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group Espen Antonsen - 24SevenOffice
RE: GIF was -- Mandated Video Format (was: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group) Dailey, David P.
RE: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group Chris Wilson
Re: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group Dao Gottwald
RE: Mandated Video Format Chris Wilson
Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML Asbjørn Ulsberg
RE: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group Chris Wilson
RE: Mandated Video Format Håkon Wium Lie
RE: Mandated Video Format Matthew Ratzloff
Use the role-attribute instead of predefined class names Daniel Schattenkirchner
RE: Mandated Video Format (was: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group) Chris Wilson
Re: The HTMLWG and WHATWG (Was: Default (informal) Style Sheet) Henri Sivonen
Re: Mandated Video Format (was: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group) Henri Sivonen
RE: The HTMLWG and WHATWG (Was: Default (informal) Style Sheet) Chris Wilson
Re: The HTMLWG and WHATWG (Was: Default (informal) Style Sheet) Henri Sivonen
Re: Mandated Video Format (was: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group) Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo
RE: Mandated Video Format (was: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group) Chris Wilson
Re: Mandated Video Format (was: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group) Maciej Stachowiak
RE: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group Chris Wilson
RE: Mandated Video Format (was: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group) Chris Wilson
RE: The HTMLWG and WHATWG (Was: Default (informal) Style Sheet) Chris Wilson
RE: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group Chris Wilson
Mandated Video Format (was: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group) Doug Schepers
Re: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group Doug Schepers
Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q Dao Gottwald
Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML Boris Zbarsky
Re: semantics [was Re: Proposed Design Principles updated] Daniel Glazman
Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q Olivier GENDRIN
Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML Olivier GENDRIN
Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q Dao Gottwald
Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML Anne van Kesteren
RE: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group Dailey, David P.
Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q Olivier GENDRIN
Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q Olivier GENDRIN
Re: Form fields for uploading Olivier GENDRIN
Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML Olivier GENDRIN
Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML Maciej Stachowiak
Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML Dao Gottwald
Re: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group Olivier GENDRIN
Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML Olivier GENDRIN
Re: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group Olivier GENDRIN
Re: The HTMLWG and WHATWG (Was: Default (informal) Style Sheet) Sierk Bornemann
Re: Proposed Design Principles updated Ian Hickson
Re: Introduce <term> element Laurens Holst
Re: Proposed Design Principles updated David Hyatt
Re: Proposed Design Principles updated olivier Thereaux
Role of Chair (Was: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group) olivier Thereaux
Re: Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group Matthew Raymond
Re: <table type="rowsortable"> Preston L. Bannister
RE: semantics [was Re: Proposed Design Principles updated] Chris Wilson

Wednesday, 4 April 2007

Re: Form fields for uploading Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Introduce <term> element Raven Brooks
Re: Proposed Design Principles updated Dao Gottwald
Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML Dao Gottwald
Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML Dao Gottwald
Re: <table type="rowsortable"> Bruce Boughton
Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML Dao Gottwald
Re: <table type="rowsortable"> Dao Gottwald
Re: Introduce <term> element Robert Brodrecht
Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML Robert Brodrecht
Re: <table type="rowsortable"> Bruce Boughton
Re: <table type="rowsortable"> nene@triin.net
Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML Boris Zbarsky
Re: Introduce <term> element nene@triin.net
Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML Anne van Kesteren
Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML Robert Brodrecht
Re: The HTMLWG and WHATWG Ian Hickson
Re: HTML5 vs HTML6 Chris Wilson
RE: Let every element have a src attribute Chris Wilson
RE: Proposed Design Principles updated Chris Wilson
RE: Proposed Design Principles updated ("don't break the web" vs respecting MIME types) Chris Wilson
RE: <table type="rowsortable"> Chris Wilson
Microsoft has now joined the HTML Working Group Chris Wilson
Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML Jason A. Lefkowitz
Re: Proposed Design Principles updated ("don't break the web" vs respecting MIME types) Anne van Kesteren
Re: Proposed Design Principles updated ("don't break the web" vs respecting MIME types) Dan Connolly
Re: Let every element have a src attribute Bruce Boughton
Re: Let every element have a src attribute Bruce Boughton
Re: Let every element have a src attribute Bruce Boughton
Re: The HTMLWG and WHATWG Doug Schepers
Re: <table type="rowsortable"> Anne van Kesteren
Re: Let every element have a src attribute Anne van Kesteren
Re: Let every element have a src attribute Jeff Schiller
Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML Murray Maloney
<table type="rowsortable"> Dailey, David P.
semantics [was Re: Proposed Design Principles updated] Dailey, David P.
Re: Let every element have a src attribute Jeff Schiller
Re: Proposed Design Principles updated Anne van Kesteren
Re: Proposed Design Principles updated Asbjørn Ulsberg
Re: Proposed Design Principles updated Asbjørn Ulsberg
Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML Asbjørn Ulsberg
Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML Asbjørn Ulsberg
Re: HTML5 vs HTML6 Olivier GENDRIN
Links to DOM Ranges (was Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML) Dave Raggett
Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML Olivier GENDRIN
Introduce <term> element Laurens Holst
Re: Proposed Design Principles updated Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Proposed Design Principles updated Elliott Sprehn
Re: Proposed Design Principles updated Ian Hickson
Re: Proposed Design Principles updated Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Proposed Design Principles updated Elliott Sprehn
Re: Proposed Design Principles updated David Hyatt
Re: HTML5 vs HTML6 T.V Raman
Re: HTML5 vs HTML6 Brad Fults
Re: Proposed Design Principles updated Dao Gottwald
Re: Proposed Design Principles updated Elliott Sprehn
Re: Proposed Design Principles updated David Hyatt
Re: Proposed Design Principles updated Karl Dubost
Re: Proposed Design Principles updated Karl Dubost
Re: Let every element have a src attribute Matthew Raymond
Re: Let every element have a src attribute Matthew Raymond

Tuesday, 3 April 2007

Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML Dao Gottwald
Re: Proposed Design Principles updated T.V Raman
HTML5 vs HTML6 T.V Raman
Re: style.background rendering - browser inconsistency Jeff Schiller
Re: The HTMLWG and WHATWG (Was: Default (informal) Style Sheet) Ian Hickson
Re: Proposed Design Principles updated Maciej Stachowiak
Re: style.background rendering - browser inconsistency Elliott Sprehn
Re: style.background rendering - browser inconsistency Elliott Sprehn
style.background rendering - browser inconsistency David Dailey
Re: Proposed Design Principles updated Murray Maloney
Re: Proposed Design Principles updated Murray Maloney
Re: HTML5 vs HTML6 paul haine
HTML5 vs HTML6 Giovanni Gentili
Re: Proposed Design Principles updated T.V Raman
Re: Proposed Design Principles updated Maciej Stachowiak
Re: The HTMLWG and WHATWG (Was: Default (informal) Style Sheet) Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer
Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML Anne van Kesteren
Re: Let every element have a src attribute Jeff Schiller
Re: Let every element have a src attribute Anne van Kesteren
Re: Let every element have a src attribute Jeff Schiller
Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML Gareth Hay
Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML Murray Maloney
Re: Let every element have a src attribute Dao Gottwald
Re: Let every element have a src attribute Murray Maloney
Re: Proposed Design Principles updated Murray Maloney
Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q Dao Gottwald
Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML Elliott Sprehn
Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML Rimantas Liubertas
Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML Asbjørn Ulsberg
Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML Asbjørn Ulsberg
Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML Anne van Kesteren
Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q Asbjørn Ulsberg
Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML Asbjørn Ulsberg
Re: <abbr>, <acronym> and initialisms Olivier GENDRIN
Re: <abbr>, <acronym> and initialisms Olivier GENDRIN
Re: no HTML WG meeting around XTech Henri Sivonen
Re: text/javascript as default for type attribute Anne van Kesteren
Re: Let every element have a src attribute Dao Gottwald
Re: Let every element have a src attribute Dao Gottwald
Re: no HTML WG meeting around XTech Brian Suda
Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q Ian Hickson
Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q Henri Sivonen
Re: text/javascript as default for type attribute Vitaly Harisov
Proposed Design Principles updated Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Let every element have a src attribute Jeff Schiller
Re: Let every element have a src attribute Matthew Raymond
Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q Alexander Graf

Monday, 2 April 2007

RE: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML Lee Roberts
Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q Ian Hickson
Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q Dao Gottwald
Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q Anne van Kesteren
Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q Henri Sivonen
Re: argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML Murray Maloney
Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q Jeff Cutsinger
Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q Asbjørn Ulsberg
Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q Ian Hickson
Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q Dan Connolly
Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q Dan Connolly
Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q L. David Baron
Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q L. David Baron
Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q Maciej Stachowiak
argument for deprecating BLOCKQUOTE in canonical HTML/XHTML Gregory J. Rosmaita
Re: text/javascript as default for type attribute Anne van Kesteren
Re: deprecate HR; replace with LS (logical seperator) Anne van Kesteren
deprecate HR; replace with LS (logical seperator) Gregory J. Rosmaita
Re: Bring back <ol start="N"> in Strict mode Murray Maloney
Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q Gregory J. Rosmaita
Re: Bring back <ol start="N"> in Strict mode Henri Sivonen
Re: Naming Wiki Pages Mike Schinkel
Re: Naming Wiki Pages Mike Schinkel
Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q Gregory J. Rosmaita
Re: text/javascript as default for type attribute Jeff Cutsinger
Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q Maciej Stachowiak
Re: The HTMLWG and WHATWG (Was: Default (informal) Style Sheet) Murray Maloney
Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q Gregory J. Rosmaita
Re: Bring back <ol start="N"> in Strict mode Benjamin Chait
Re: Bring back <ol start="N"> in Strict mode Henri Sivonen
Re: text/javascript as default for type attribute Jeff Cutsinger
no HTML WG meeting around XTech Dan Connolly
Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q Elliott Sprehn
Re: text/javascript as default for type attribute Denis Boudreau (WebConforme)
Re: text/javascript as default for type attribute Jeff Schiller
text/javascript as default for type attribute Vitaly Harisov
Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q Maciej Stachowiak
Bring back <ol start="N"> in Strict mode Vitaly Harisov
Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q Gregory J. Rosmaita
Re: Naming Wiki Pages Elliott Sprehn
Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Naming Wiki Pages Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Proposed Design Principles T.V Raman
Re: Form fields for uploading Alexander Graf
Re: Form fields for uploading Ian Hickson
Re: The HTMLWG and WHATWG (Was: Default (informal) Style Sheet) Ian Hickson
Re: ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q Murray Maloney
Re: abbreviations in canonical HTML (thoughts & concrete suggestions) Murray Maloney
Re: Form fields for uploading Dao Gottwald
Re: Form fields for uploading Elliott Sprehn
ensuring the existence & enhancing the power of Q Gregory J. Rosmaita
abbreviations in canonical HTML (thoughts & concrete suggestions) Gregory J. Rosmaita
Re: Form fields for uploading Alexander Graf
Re: Form fields for uploading Benjamin Chait
Form fields for uploading Alexander Graf
Re: Superstructure markup Henri Sivonen
Re: Naming Wiki Pages Dan Connolly
Re: The HTMLWG and WHATWG (Was: Default (informal) Style Sheet) Daniel Glazman

Sunday, 1 April 2007

Re: [whatwg] Default (informal) Style Sheet Martin Atkins

Monday, 2 April 2007

New widget: picture html60.narod.ru
Re: Posting to this list paul haine
Re: Let every element have a src attribute Elliott Sprehn
New widget: picture html60.narod.ru
Re: Let every element have a src attribute Elliott Sprehn

Sunday, 1 April 2007

Re: Design Principles Document update Preston L. Bannister

Monday, 2 April 2007

New widget: picture html60.narod.ru
Re: DefaultStyleSheet05: (was Default (informal) Style Sheet) Karl Dubost
Re: Let every element have a src attribute Dao Gottwald
Superstructure markup Olivier GENDRIN
Re: DefaultStyleSheet05: (was Default (informal) Style Sheet) James Graham
Re: Let every element have a src attribute Matthew Raymond
Re: DefaultStyleSheet05: (was Default (informal) Style Sheet) Asbjørn Ulsberg
Re: [whatwg] Default (informal) Style Sheet Asbjørn Ulsberg
Re: [whatwg] Default (informal) Style Sheet Asbjørn Ulsberg
Re: [whatwg] Default (informal) Style Sheet Asbjørn Ulsberg
Re: Let every element have a src attribute Dao Gottwald
Re: Naming Wiki Pages Mike Schinkel
Re: The HTMLWG and WHATWG (Was: Default (informal) Style Sheet) Mike Schinkel
Re: Naming Wiki Pages Mike Schinkel
Re: Posting to this list Alexey Feldgendler
Re: Naming Wiki Pages Marcos Caceres
Re: Let every element have a src attribute Dao Gottwald
Re: The HTMLWG and WHATWG (Was: Default (informal) Style Sheet) Ian Hickson
Re: [whatwg] Default (informal) Style Sheet Anne van Kesteren
Re: Naming Wiki Pages Anne van Kesteren
Re: The HTMLWG and WHATWG (Was: Default (informal) Style Sheet) Mike Schinkel
Re: Naming Wiki Pages Mike Schinkel
Re: [whatwg] Default (informal) Style Sheet Mike Schinkel
Re: [whatwg] Default (informal) Style Sheet Sander Tekelenburg
Re: [whatwg] Default (informal) Style Sheet Sander Tekelenburg
[admin] switch to monthly archives Karl Dubost
The HTMLWG and WHATWG (Was: Default (informal) Style Sheet) Ian Hickson
RE: Naming Wiki Pages Marcos Caceres
Re: DefaultStyleSheet05: (was Default (informal) Style Sheet) Karl Dubost
DefaultStyleSheet05: (was Default (informal) Style Sheet) Mike Schinkel
Browser Fragment Positioning (was Default (informal) Style Sheet) Mike Schinkel
Re: Default (informal) Style Sheet Mike Schinkel
RE: Why Have Design Principles? (was Re: Design Principles Document update) Dailey, David P.
Re: Posting to this list Laurens Holst

Sunday, 1 April 2007

Why Have Design Principles? (was Re: Design Principles Document update) Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Posting to this list Doug Schepers
Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5 Henri Sivonen
Re: [whatwg] Default (informal) Style Sheet Anne van Kesteren
Re: [whatwg] Default (informal) Style Sheet Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Default (informal) Style Sheet Murray Maloney

Saturday, 31 March 2007

Re: E-mail subscription and RSS Vitaly Harisov

Sunday, 1 April 2007

Re: [whatwg] <video> element feedback Shadow2531
Re: Default (informal) Style Sheet Asbjørn Ulsberg
RE: [whatwg] Default (informal) Style Sheet Kempen, E.J.F. van
Re: Design Principles Document update Laurens Holst
Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5 Doug Schepers
Re: Default (informal) Style Sheet Lachlan Hunt
Default (informal) Style Sheet Asbjørn Ulsberg
Re: Proposed Design Principles Asbjørn Ulsberg
Re: Doctypes and the dialects of HTML 5 Asbjørn Ulsberg
Re: Multipart response support Asbjørn Ulsberg
Re: E-mail subscription and RSS Lachlan Hunt

Last message date: Monday, 30 April 2007 23:57:52 UTC