- From: James Graham <jg307@cam.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 17:51:05 +0100
- To: Dão Gottwald <dao@design-noir.de>
- CC: David Dailey <david.dailey@sru.edu>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, public-html@w3.org
Dão Gottwald wrote:
> Hmm, that's what I thought too. What I tried then in Firefox (Gecko
> 1.9a4pre) is <table><thead>...</thead><tr>...</tr></table>, and tbody
> _wasn't_ created in that case. Now if tbody is created in the
> <table><tr>...</tr></table> case, that seems completely orthogonal to
> the HTML4.01 spec and also incompatible with the WHATWG draft.
That doesn't seem to be how Opera 9.20 or Firefox 2.0.0.3 behave; in both
browsers I get a tree like[1]:
# DOCTYPE: html
# HTML
* HEAD
* BODY
o TABLE
+ THEAD
+ TBODY
# TR
I don't have access to IE or Safari to test on.
[1]
http://software.hixie.ch/utilities/js/live-dom-viewer/?%3C%21DOCTYPE%20html%3E%0A%3Ctable%3E%0A%3Cthead%3E%0A%3C/thead%3E%0A%3Ctr%3E%0A%3C/tr%3E
--
"Eternity's a terrible thought. I mean, where's it all going to end?"
-- Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead
Received on Tuesday, 17 April 2007 16:52:14 UTC