- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 09:54:30 +0200
- To: "Mike Schinkel" <w3c-lists@mikeschinkel.com>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 09:44:27 +0200, Mike Schinkel <w3c-lists@mikeschinkel.com> wrote: > Smylers wrote: >> <small> isn't entirely presentational, in that it _can_ be used to >> indicate 'small print' or something of lesser importance; sort-of an >> opposite of <em>. > > True, but the important point is that a UA can never be sure why the > author used it so it can't be trusted as a semantic element. That argument goes for *any* element. So I'm not sure it should be considered much. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Saturday, 28 April 2007 07:54:45 UTC