W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > April 2007

Re: missing principle

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 09:54:30 +0200
To: "Mike Schinkel" <w3c-lists@mikeschinkel.com>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.trhhk4vl64w2qv@id-c0020>

On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 09:44:27 +0200, Mike Schinkel  
<w3c-lists@mikeschinkel.com> wrote:
> Smylers wrote:
>> <small> isn't entirely presentational, in that it _can_ be used to
>> indicate 'small print' or something of lesser importance; sort-of an
>> opposite of <em>.
> True, but the important point is that a UA can never be sure why the  
> author used it so it can't be trusted as a semantic element.

That argument goes for *any* element. So I'm not sure it should be  
considered much.

Anne van Kesteren
Received on Saturday, 28 April 2007 07:54:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:19 UTC