Re: missing principle

On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 09:44:27 +0200, Mike Schinkel  
<> wrote:
> Smylers wrote:
>> <small> isn't entirely presentational, in that it _can_ be used to
>> indicate 'small print' or something of lesser importance; sort-of an
>> opposite of <em>.
> True, but the important point is that a UA can never be sure why the  
> author used it so it can't be trusted as a semantic element.

That argument goes for *any* element. So I'm not sure it should be  
considered much.

Anne van Kesteren

Received on Saturday, 28 April 2007 07:54:45 UTC