W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > April 2007

Re: Proposal to Adopt HTML5

From: Josef Spillner <spillner@rn.inf.tu-dresden.de>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 12:14:24 +0200
To: public-html@w3.org
Message-Id: <200704111214.25278.spillner@rn.inf.tu-dresden.de>

Am Mittwoch, 11. April 2007 04:10 schrieben Sie:
> HTML 4 is so underspecified it's a miracle it's even implemented.
> And I am one of the few here (with Murray, Chris and Dan) who were
> already here in the HTML WG for HTML 4.

Has there ever been an analysis of why this happened? I would be interested to 
know if the spec was already considered vague at the time of finishing the 
draft, or if it was granting too much freedom to implementors.

Received on Wednesday, 11 April 2007 21:57:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:18 UTC