- From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2007 16:20:53 +0200
- To: Chris Wilson <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "Dailey, David P." <david.dailey@sru.edu>, Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On 05/04/2007 02:08, Chris Wilson wrote: > Dailey, David P. [david.dailey@sru.edu] wrote: > *I rather like HTML5.‾5 as a name -- it would, in some sort of recursive sense, acknowledge the ongoing contributions of WHATWG, but make it clearly distinct from it, hence implying something closer to HTML6 than to HTML5 -- is there, by the way any real way to make an overscore 5 in HTML to imply a repeating decimal? > > > In CSS there is: HTML 5.<span style="text-decoration: overline">5</span>. I would not give a new number, the press focusing too much on numbers, and would do what we did in the good old days of html+. Make it html5+ and explicitely say it's a codename until the feature set says if it's a minor change or a major one. </Daniel>
Received on Thursday, 5 April 2007 14:20:52 UTC