W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > April 2007

RE: survey of top web sites

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 16:44:43 -0500
To: "Dailey, David P." <david.dailey@sru.edu>
Cc: sean@elementary-group.com, Nick Fitzsimons <nick@nickfitz.co.uk>, public-html@w3.org
Message-Id: <1177623883.22874.231.camel@dirk>

On Thu, 2007-04-26 at 16:11 -0400, Dailey, David P. wrote:
> On Thu 4/26/2007 1:37 PM Sean Fraser wrote:
> >The survey I propose would - simply - have Pass/Fail criteria; HTML5 would
> > include error numbers and issues.
> The reasons I joined the ongoing discussion of methodology here a
>  few notes back (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2007Apr/1453.html)
>  may stem from my  misunderstanding about why we are surveying the
>  top 200 web sites to begin with. The first reference to it I can see
>  appears on DanC's agenda (http://www.w3.org/html/wg/il16) as 
> "One idea from a chat with Chris W. is to survey the top 200 web sites regularly."
> listed under Proposed Design Principles.

Oops; I can see how that might be misleading.

The survey idea is related to the market threshold requirement,
in my mind.

Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Thursday, 26 April 2007 21:44:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:19 UTC