Re: Formal definition of HTML5 (was Re: Version information)

On 13. apr. 2007, at 11.50, Henri Sivonen wrote:

> The schema (RELAX NG and Schematron) is an implementation detail.  
> It has no normative standing whatsoever (and, in my opinion, should  
> not have). Moreover, the schema *cannot* cover all (X)HTML5  
> conformance requirements.

Can you elaborate on this please?
(Or point me to somewhere where this is described)

What conformance requirements cannot be covered by the schema?


Received on Friday, 13 April 2007 20:14:39 UTC