Re: Non-goal for HTML: Picture-perfect rendering from Murray Maloney on 2007-04-16 (public-html@w3.org from April 2007)

From: Murray Maloney <murray@muzmo.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 18:57:21 -0400
To: public-html@w3.org
Message-Id: <5.1.1.6.2.20070416185028.086e3f50@mail.muzmo.com>

At 02:23 PM 4/16/2007 -0700, David Hyatt wrote:

><canvas> supports fallback for accessibility.
So are you saying that falling back is interoperable or not?
If it is, then why do you need picture-perfect rendering?
If not, then how does picture-perfect rendering contribute
to interoperability?

Is my paperback version of the Stand, somehow evidence
of a failure of interoperability in the printing process?

How about my vinyl 45 of "Satisfaction"?

Or my iTunes AAC of "Let's Go Get Stoned"?

Received on Monday, 16 April 2007 23:09:49 UTC