- From: Arthur Jennings <arthur.jennings@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 14:45:15 -0700
- To: public-html@w3.org
- Message-ID: <57580290704161445x7ef8e3bbg622bb400f084273d@mail.gmail.com>
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Arthur Jennings <arthur.jennings@gmail.com> Date: Apr 16, 2007 2:43 PM Subject: Re: Versioning and html[5] To: Chris Wilson <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com> On 4/16/07, Chris Wilson <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com> wrote: > > We have to ship at roughly a given date. It's possible we don't find a > bug or spec mis-compliance until late in the cycle, at the point where the > bar for changes to the release is extremely high. It's possible, as I said > before, that the spec just doesn't state COMPLETELY what the implementation > must do, in all possible combinations with other features. > > And then, of course, once we've shipped and been out there in the market > for a year, how many hundreds/thousands/millions of users will be affected > when we change it? > I understand why that's a problem, Chris, but I don't understand how having a "this page is HTML 5" flag is going to solve that problem. Are you saying you won't be able to fix your HTML 5 bugs until HTML 6 comes along with *its* own flag? -- Arthur Jennings -- Arthur Jennings
Received on Monday, 16 April 2007 21:45:27 UTC