- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 09:53:25 +0900
- To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Cc: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, Henrik Dvergsdal <henrik.dvergsdal@hibo.no>, public-html@w3.org
Le 12 avr. 2007 à 07:00, Maciej Stachowiak a écrit :
> The spec itself should mainly try to address implementors of user
> agents (including browsers, search engines, data mining tools,
> etc), conformance checkers and authoring tools, since these
> audiences need a significant amount of precision.
>
> A simpler guide for authors might be a useful addendum, and of
> course we definitely want exhaustive test cases.
With a bit of scripting, (and/or wikification), there might be a
possibility for having something ala PHP documentation. One of the
cool things of PHP documentation is the breakdown of each feature
with contributions from people. So not in the official specification
but an annotated version of the new specification. Something similar
had been done in the past with the [annotated XML Specification][1]
by Tim Bray.
[1]: http://www.xml.com/axml/testaxml.htm
--
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Thursday, 12 April 2007 00:54:50 UTC