- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 12:16:48 -0700
- To: public-html@w3.org
- Message-ID: <20070410191648.GA4826@ridley.dbaron.org>
On Tuesday 2007-04-10 20:38 +0200, Henrik Dvergsdal wrote:
> If we are to make a jump like this, I think it we should have a
> really strict delta document. One that we can trust contains all
> significant aspects of differences between the HTML4 and HTML5 specs
> at all times. This should not be just a wiki. I think the editor
> should be responsible for keeping it up to date as the proposal evolves.
I don't think this makes sense.
One of the problems I hope this group will solve is that HTML4 is
frequently ambiguous and often lacks conformance requirements where
it should have them. In other words, it frequently doesn't define
the things a spec ought to be defining. Many parts of it are not
useful at any level deeper than as a list of requested features, and
I don't think it's useful, or worth anyone's time, to track
differences between a list of requested features and an actual
specification designed to lead to interoperable implementations.
-David
--
L. David Baron <URL: http://dbaron.org/ >
Technical Lead, Layout & CSS, Mozilla Corporation
Received on Tuesday, 10 April 2007 19:16:58 UTC