- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 12:16:48 -0700
- To: public-html@w3.org
- Message-ID: <20070410191648.GA4826@ridley.dbaron.org>
On Tuesday 2007-04-10 20:38 +0200, Henrik Dvergsdal wrote: > If we are to make a jump like this, I think it we should have a > really strict delta document. One that we can trust contains all > significant aspects of differences between the HTML4 and HTML5 specs > at all times. This should not be just a wiki. I think the editor > should be responsible for keeping it up to date as the proposal evolves. I don't think this makes sense. One of the problems I hope this group will solve is that HTML4 is frequently ambiguous and often lacks conformance requirements where it should have them. In other words, it frequently doesn't define the things a spec ought to be defining. Many parts of it are not useful at any level deeper than as a list of requested features, and I don't think it's useful, or worth anyone's time, to track differences between a list of requested features and an actual specification designed to lead to interoperable implementations. -David -- L. David Baron <URL: http://dbaron.org/ > Technical Lead, Layout & CSS, Mozilla Corporation
Received on Tuesday, 10 April 2007 19:16:58 UTC