- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:16:24 -0400
- To: "Edward O'Connor" <hober0@gmail.com>
- CC: public-html@w3.org
Edward O'Connor wrote: > >> One thing I strongly believe need to be defined clearly is how HTML >> fragments, such as those in Atom documents, are to be parsed. > > If this WG adopts the WHATWG draft, I imagine this would be handled by the > innerHTML parsing mode. This presumes that all existing markup in existing feeds is retroactively to be interpreted as HTML5? I would have tended to agree with this, but this seems contrary to the position of some workgroup members that opt-in versioning is mandatory. - Sam Ruby
Received on Tuesday, 24 April 2007 21:16:36 UTC