- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 19:30:27 -0700
- To: sean@elementary-group.com
- Cc: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, public-html@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 25 April 2007 02:30:40 UTC
On Apr 24, 2007, at 7:22 PM, Sean Fraser wrote: > > > On Tue Apr 24 18:53 , Maciej Stachowiak sent: > > >Another useful source of sites to look at might be sites with > Google PageRank 9 or 10. Although there are some quirky entries, > this is a good >indicator of sites that are heavily linked to. > > From Dan's post: > > "If we end up with 4 or 5 overlapping surveys (world, europe, US, > asia, by language, by pagerank, by traffic, etc) I think that would > be great." > > Yes, Page Rank would be included. The relevance would be in > translating PR as authority ranking since Alexa data is derived > from those users who have the Alexa toolbar installed and voted. A > cursory review of the Top 100 Alexa sites showed some sites with > PR5 and PR6. One had PR4. Remember these Top 500 sites have the > _popular_ vote. Alexa is also believed to be a misleading indicator of overall traffic in some cases. I have seen posts where people showed internal server logs showing their traffic going up, even as Alexa reported their traffic going down. I think it is still a useful resource but we have to be aware that it might be non-representative to a significant degree. Regards, Maciej
Received on Wednesday, 25 April 2007 02:30:40 UTC