- From: Laurens Holst <lholst@students.cs.uu.nl>
- Date: Sat, 07 Apr 2007 19:58:21 +0900
- To: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <4617794D.9000204@students.cs.uu.nl>
L. David Baron schreef: >> In hundreds/thousands of years how will they know which version of >> HTML they need to implement to view today's content? >> >> This is definitely a benefit of version information within the >> markup. In the future when someone comes across a document with HTML >> they know exactly which specification they need to implement. >> > > You're confusing theoretical ability with practical ability. > > Sure, somebody could go out and implement every single past version > based on specifications. (Although, in reality, those > specifications won't be sufficient if the meaning of the versions is > defined by what Internet Explorer implements rather than by the > actual specification.) > > But that's orders of magnitude more work than implementing a single > specification, and therefore much less likely to be done. > > That it's theoretically possible is not worth much if it's too much > work for anyone to do in practice. In the future I bet they have software which will automatically scan and implement any specification ;). That said, as long as ‘don’t break the web’ remains a fundamental principle of HTML5, I don’t see a direct need for versioning. If any future version of HTML decides to ditch that principle, versioning can be re-introduced. Worst case, any implementation can create a custom attribute on the root element to indicate which ‘rendering-mode’ has to be used. This is more likely to be effective than a specification-version, as the problems that supposedly need different rendering modes are related to the releases of the software and not the specification. ~Grauw -- Ushiko-san! Kimi wa doushite, Ushiko-san nan da!! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Laurens Holst, student, university of Utrecht, the Netherlands. Website: www.grauw.nl. Backbase employee; www.backbase.com.
Received on Saturday, 7 April 2007 10:59:38 UTC