- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 10:11:58 +0200
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- CC: Magnus Kristiansen <magnusrk+w3c@pvv.org>, Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Anne van Kesteren schrieb: >> Actually, that's not completely true. In some places it specifies >> "what is currently in use", sometimes not. IMHO, this is one of the >> bigger problems with that spec: it doesn't offer clean replacement >> interfaces for things that are broken in (some of) today's >> implementations... > > A replacement interface introduces more problems. It doesn't solve any. > It's like versioning. A replacement interface that has clearer semantics and is interoperable solves a lot of problems, even if you can't use it in the short term. Not specifying it is what's causing problems: the original problem just stays unsolved. Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 19 April 2007 08:12:13 UTC