- From: Dão Gottwald <dao@design-noir.de>
- Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 01:32:55 +0200
- To: Henk-Jan de Boer <html-wg@hjdeboer.nl>
- CC: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Henk-Jan de Boer schrieb: >>> Wouldn't it be better to pick up the versioning debate later on, when >>> Apple, Opera and Mozilla can claim that HTML5 is fully backwards >>> compatible with existing content? >> >> IE, due to its broken standards mode, often gets different content >> served than Safari, Opera and Firefox. Authors expect IE to be broken, >> hence the risk to break sites when fixing bugs. You can't test this >> with other browsers. > > Thanks, I did a wrong assumption when I wrote that. You're very right; > but here's that paradox again: how can HTML5 claim to be fully backwards > compatible with all legacy content, when a lot of that content is > written, based on incompatibilities of the past? HTML5 claims to be compatible with legacy HTML. It doesn't claim to solve CSS and DOM compatibility issues. --Dao
Received on Tuesday, 17 April 2007 23:33:05 UTC