- From: Alexander Graf <a.graf@aetherworld.org>
- Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 02:26:06 +0200
- To: Mike Schinkel <w3c-lists@mikeschinkel.com>
- Cc: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
Received on Sunday, 15 April 2007 00:27:19 UTC
On 15.04.2007, at 02:04, Mike Schinkel wrote: > Alexander Graf wrote: >> You do realize that all those tools use the Microsoft viewers and >> merely provide an >> alternative interface? That also means all those tools only run on >> Windows. > Do you realize your assertion is false as well? For example: No, actually I don't. > *Aspose.Word: * Aspose.Words enables .NET .... > *TxText:* TX Text Control .NET It's news to me that .NET runs on platforms such as Mac OS X, Linux, BSD, ... and even if they would be able to work under Mono, they still require Windows (according to the developers and the product websites). And the Aspose.Word / Aspose.PowerPoint Java applications also require Windows. > And as I said, those were only a few. Here is a Java open-source > project: [1] [1] http://jakarta.apache.org/poi/ Which doesn't read Microsoft Word files... > My assertion stands; it economically possible for people to reverse > engineer Microsoft's formats. My and Håkon's assertion stands. It's not economically possible for people to reverse engineer Office formats. Especially not with that OLE container stuff.
Received on Sunday, 15 April 2007 00:27:19 UTC