- From: Murray Maloney <murray@muzmo.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 18:45:26 -0400
- To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Cc: Murray Maloney <murray@muzmo.com>,public-html@w3.org
At 02:31 PM 4/16/2007 -0700, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: >On Apr 16, 2007, at 2:03 PM, Murray Maloney wrote: >>At 11:07 AM 4/16/2007 -0700, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: >>>On Apr 16, 2007, at 10:39 AM, Murray Maloney wrote: > >How about you convince me? I actually gave an argument to support my >position (specifying rendering is needed for interoperability) and >you didn't give any argument for yours. I disagree with you. That is, you claim that picture-perfect rendering is needed for interoperability, but you have not supported that claim. I claim that it is not needed for interoperability, and I have pointed out that "picture-perfect" is irrelevant in other modalities. Therefore, your argument lacks a foundation. >>While you are at it, please explain how you propose to >>accomplish "Picture-perfect rendering" in braille and speech. > >Notice that I said "for some media" - pixel-precise rendering of >certain HTML constructs on visual interactive user agents would not >have any effects on aural or braille rendering. And therefore would not be any help with interoperability. It's not about painting pixels on a screen. It is about empowering people. Regards, Murray
Received on Monday, 16 April 2007 23:10:13 UTC