- From: Josh Sled <jsled@asynchronous.org>
- Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:48:25 -0400
- To: "Dailey, David P." <david.dailey@sru.edu>
- Cc: public-html@w3.org
- Message-Id: <1177649305.2532.520.camel@phoenix>
On Thu, 2007-04-26 at 19:05 -0400, Dailey, David P. wrote: > On Thu 4/26/2007 3:29 PM Anne van Kesteren wrote: > >Web Forms 2 has taken as much features from XForms as possible to the > >extend that it is feasible to integrate the XForms features in a model > >that needs to be compatible with deployed HTML content and HTML > >implementations. [...] > I see from the above that you are petitioning for a variance from the > "don't reinvent the wheel" aphorism, for the reason that it is > impossible to get there without a new kind of wheel. I don't read that as "reinvent the wheel" ... I read it as "WF2 wants to extend HTML4 forms with the goodness XForms suggests, but without reinventing the wheel ('remaining compatible with deployed HTML content')." > Given that other XMLand other web technologies have come to depend on > XForms, what impact, if any, would HTML's variance from the zoning > ordinance have that might cause deterioration of the neighborhood? An [...] > Is that how the design principles will work? Frankly, I'd prefer a > whole lot less formality, than I fear the "manifesto" may promote. I don't believe anyone else is suggesting that the design principles would "work" in such an obnoxious way. -- ...jsled http://asynchronous.org/ - a=jsled;b=asynchronous.org; echo ${a}@${b}
Received on Friday, 27 April 2007 04:48:23 UTC