- From: Dão Gottwald <dao@design-noir.de>
- Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 11:59:27 +0200
- To: Henrik Dvergsdal <henrik.dvergsdal@hibo.no>
- CC: public-html@w3.org, Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
Henrik Dvergsdal schrieb: > On 20. apr. 2007, at 10.34, Karl Dubost wrote: > >> The way we worked in the former QA Working Group is that we had strict >> template rules for writing content. A kind of mini guidebook for >> writing a section. We even went as far to publish our [publication >> process][2] in the specification itself as an example. The [detailed >> process][3] is given in terms of a template and requirements to edit a >> section AND guidelines to help the author to write the section. > > I support this. Could we just adopt/modify the guidelines from the QA > WG? I don't think that would be beneficial for us, assuming that we don't start from scratch but with the WHATWG drafts. At least, I suppose it would work better with Ian as the (main or even sole, but at least co-) editor. --Dao
Received on Friday, 20 April 2007 10:00:55 UTC