W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > April 2007

Re: Editor and authors

From: Dão Gottwald <dao@design-noir.de>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 11:59:27 +0200
Message-ID: <46288EFF.3080402@design-noir.de>
To: Henrik Dvergsdal <henrik.dvergsdal@hibo.no>
CC: public-html@w3.org, Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>

Henrik Dvergsdal schrieb:
> On 20. apr. 2007, at 10.34, Karl Dubost wrote:
>> The way we worked in the former QA Working Group is that we had strict 
>> template rules for writing content. A kind of mini guidebook for 
>> writing a section. We even went as far to publish our [publication 
>> process][2] in the specification itself as an example. The [detailed 
>> process][3] is given in terms of a template and requirements to edit a 
>> section AND guidelines to help the author to write the section.
> I support this. Could we just adopt/modify the guidelines from the QA 
> WG?

I don't think that would be beneficial for us, assuming that we don't 
start from scratch but with the WHATWG drafts. At least, I suppose it 
would work better with Ian as the (main or even sole, but at least co-) 

Received on Friday, 20 April 2007 10:00:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:19 UTC