- From: Elliott Sprehn <esprehn@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 00:45:57 -0400
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, public-html@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 4 April 2007 04:46:13 UTC
Thank you for the clarification Hixie. This is where I was getting hung up on the proposed sniffing feature. - Elliott Sprehn On Apr 4, 2007, at 12:36 AM, Ian Hickson wrote: > On Wed, 4 Apr 2007, Karl Dubost wrote: >> Le 3 avr. 2007 à 16:26, Maciej Stachowiak a écrit : >>> * Constraint: Data-metadata inconsistency >>> Agents MUST NOT ignore message metadata without the consent of >>> the user. >>> (The cited example of warning about or refusing to render a jpeg >>> with a type >>> of image/gif would violate Don't Break The Web and is unlikely to be >>> implemented.) >> >> Another *real* example where browsers content sniffing is bad in >> usability. >> For example, I'm writing a blog post about HTML design. I want to >> show the >> source code of an HTML file. I then use an object element and >> configure the >> server to send the html file as *text/plain* >> >> <object data="test.html"> >> <p>Source code of a HTML document</p> >> </object> >> >> What I want to see is the source code, not the HTML. > > And that works, and is what HTML5 requires. Maciej's example was > image/foo > getting treated as image/bar -- where's the harm in that? > > -- > Ian Hickson U+1047E ) > \._.,--....,'``. fL > http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _ > \ ;`._ ,. > Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'-- > (,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 4 April 2007 04:46:13 UTC