- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 11:22:05 +1000
- To: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, "Magnus Kristiansen" <magnusrk+w3c@pvv.org>
- Cc: "Karl Dubost" <karl@w3.org>, "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>
On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 21:33:36 +1000, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: >> The XHR spec is also a "specify what is currently in use" spec, >> similar to what a canvas spec would be. The 10 months to reach first LC >> contrasts quite a bit with the earlier message about a canvas standard: > > Actually, that's not completely true. In some places it specifies "what > is currently in use", sometimes not. IMHO, this is one of the bigger > problems with that spec: it doesn't offer clean replacement interfaces > for things that are broken in (some of) today's implementations... A replacement interface introduces more problems. It doesn't solve any. It's like versioning. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Thursday, 19 April 2007 01:23:13 UTC