- From: Simon Pieters <zcorpan@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 00:23:29 +0200
- To: "Henrik Dvergsdal" <henrik.dvergsdal@hibo.no>, public-html@w3.org
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 00:12:40 +0200, Henrik Dvergsdal <henrik.dvergsdal@hibo.no> wrote: > On 12. apr. 2007, at 23.41, Simon Pieters wrote: > >> 1. It is a valid SGML doctype (FWIW). > > Well, I don't have access to the SGML standard so I cannot check on > this, but using a DOCTYPE declaration without reference to a Formal > identifier/DTD is pretty useless and I think a standard like this should > have a formal identifier. If we were to define an SGML serialization, then sure, but we're not (again, see our charter). >> 2. You don't need a doctype in XML. > > No, you can refer to a schema instead, [...] You don't need to refer to a schema either. -- Simon Pieters
Received on Thursday, 12 April 2007 22:23:26 UTC