- From: David Hyatt <hyatt@apple.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 11:36:21 -0700
- To: Murray Maloney <murray@muzmo.com>
- Cc: public-html@w3.org
<canvas> is just a dynamic image. That's all it is. Do you think browsers should all render GIFs differently? Or PNGs? dave (hyatt@apple.com) On Apr 16, 2007, at 10:39 AM, Murray Maloney wrote: > > I couldn't agree more with T.V. Raman on this matter. > I suggest that we promote this statement to the status > of Design Principle. > > At 09:05 AM 4/16/2007 -0700, T.V Raman wrote: > > >> If we're talking about HTML producing pixel perfect rendering, >> then I suggest it's time to press the reset button -- that was >> never HTML's goal, and nor should it ever become its goal. >> >> Ian Hickson writes: >> > >> > On Sat, 14 Apr 2007, Chris Wilson wrote: >> > > > >> > > > Could you give any concrete examples of vagueness? I'd like >> to fix any >> > > > that are unintentional. >> > > >> > > <canvas>. You've specified an entire immediate-mode graphics >> api, more >> > > extensive in some ways than GDI, without describing the >> parameters or >> > > giving rendering rules to get interoperable pixel-perfect >> rendering. >> > >> > Could you be more specific? What parameters do you think should be >> > specified and which rendering rules do you think are needed to get >> > interoperable pixel-perfect rendering? >> > >> > Cheers, >> > -- >> > Ian Hickson U+1047E ) >> \._.,--....,'``. fL >> > http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _ >> \ ;`._ ,. >> > Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'-- >> (,_..'`-.;.' >> >> -- >> Best Regards, >> --raman >> >> Title: Research Scientist >> Email: raman@google.com >> WWW: http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman/ >> Google: tv+raman >> GTalk: raman@google.com, tv.raman.tv@gmail.com >> PGP: http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman/raman-almaden.asc > >
Received on Monday, 16 April 2007 18:36:39 UTC