Re: innerHTML and setTimeout

I would second this statement. These are used extensively especially 
with the uptake of AJAX, innerHTML is being used all over the show..

David Dailey wrote:
> The WHATWG proposal makes a couple of modest recommendations that seem 
> to be rather worth endorsing, since people have been using them for 
> almost a decade now: innerHTML and setTimeout.
> I gather (somewhat informally) that neither has appeared as a part of 
> W3C recos, but both have their merits and (I suppose) shortcomings. 
> All the major browsers seem to support both, so why not make them 
> official? * Both things are a part of the landscape of extant dynamic 
> web programming, for better or worse.
> I am unsure whether this group will ultimately be allowed to undertake 
> line-item review of parts of the WHATWG proposal. Always an optimist, 
> I assume that W3C might at some time have an opportunity to accept 
> some, but perhaps not all, of what WHATWG has so generously provided, 
> without breaking the web.
> David Dailey
> *I do have a quibble with setTimeout. From the WHATWG working draft:
> "Thus the HTML scripting model [for setTimeout]is strictly 
> single-threaded and not reentrant."
> which may be worth voicing at some time, I think, since it causes some 
> amount of agony.

Received on Monday, 9 April 2007 21:27:35 UTC