- From: Terje Bless <link@pobox.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 08:40:23 +0200
- To: W3C HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 mattraymond@earthlink.net (Matthew Raymond) wrote: >Chris Wilson wrote: >>No. We will have our own proprietary, non-invalidating opt-in switch to >>"really standards as of IEn" mode. > >This is even worse, because the switch, by being proprietary, would >be non-conformant, so a standards-conformant document would have to be >turned into a non-conformant document just to be rendered as a >standards-conformant document. […] It is arguable whether altering the behavior of an UA implementation based on, say, a “magic” comment — <?x-ms level="5"?> — in a way that is not explicitly defined in the standard would affect the implementation's conformance status. - -- I'm [less] than thrilled by the [VM situation]; all sides of it. I [think] we need a [fork] in that area so that you guys would stop stepping on each others' toes. I'm taking no part in your merry 5-way clusterfuck -- sort that mess out between yourselves. -- Alexander Viro on lkml -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP SDK 3.8.1 wj8DBQFGKGBWo/I+siR19ewRAn0FAKDlccavVCdzj2xfbK9gF1FYcPbjTQCgm83V UZVAR82K4TlSZdzfbGLfhVU=+30D -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Friday, 20 April 2007 06:40:27 UTC