- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2007 22:25:46 +0200
- To: "Doug Schepers" <doug.schepers@vectoreal.com>, "David Hyatt" <hyatt@apple.com>
- Cc: "Maciej Stachowiak" <mjs@apple.com>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 21:32:18 +0200, Doug Schepers <doug.schepers@vectoreal.com> wrote: > Understood. I'm not suggesting, in any way, that it be changed, and I'm > not sure why you think I am. Decoupling the element from the graphics > APIs wouldn't be a significant change, unless I'm misunderstanding > something. And the licensing issue of where it's published (whether in > HTML or as a separate spec) wouldn't require any changes to the > technology. The graphics API relies on the definition of the <canvas> element, the <img> element, several DOM specifications already referenced by HTML5 for other reasons, etc. Unless someone is volunteering to split out the graphics API from the HTML5 proposal and draft it as a separate specification (and getting it right, etc.) I don't think it's worth doing. (Same for all other "I think we better split this out" proposals.) -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Monday, 9 April 2007 20:25:57 UTC