- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:22:57 -0500
- To: public-html@w3.org
In the teleconference survey, Josef Spillner writes:
"Clarification would be needed on the top200 vs. top200-US sites survey
suggestions. The latter one would clearly produce skewed results, but
the former one should also not be more than a tiny source of input, as
top sites usually don't build HTML pages, they buy them instead."
-- http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/tel26Apr/results
I'm not really that picky. If you want to survey the top 200 sites
in the world, go for it. If you want to survey the top 3 sites
in your neighborhood, that's perhaps a little less interesting,
but I'd still like to hear about it.
If we end up with 4 or 5 overlapping surveys (world, europe,
US, asia, by language, by pagerank, by traffic, etc) I think
that would be great.
Does anybody have any progress to report so far? either
for HTML4-happiness or HTML5-happiness or XHTML-happiness?
p.s. for reference, for anyone joining the conversation recently...
a periodic survey of the top 200 web sites
* e.g. Alexa top 500
* do they conform to the current draft?
* are the ways they don't conform captured in an issues
list?
* which features do they use?
* are they mobile-happy, WAI-happy?
-- http://esw.w3.org/topic/HtmlTaskBrainstorm
--
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Tuesday, 24 April 2007 22:22:59 UTC