- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:22:57 -0500
- To: public-html@w3.org
In the teleconference survey, Josef Spillner writes: "Clarification would be needed on the top200 vs. top200-US sites survey suggestions. The latter one would clearly produce skewed results, but the former one should also not be more than a tiny source of input, as top sites usually don't build HTML pages, they buy them instead." -- http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/tel26Apr/results I'm not really that picky. If you want to survey the top 200 sites in the world, go for it. If you want to survey the top 3 sites in your neighborhood, that's perhaps a little less interesting, but I'd still like to hear about it. If we end up with 4 or 5 overlapping surveys (world, europe, US, asia, by language, by pagerank, by traffic, etc) I think that would be great. Does anybody have any progress to report so far? either for HTML4-happiness or HTML5-happiness or XHTML-happiness? p.s. for reference, for anyone joining the conversation recently... a periodic survey of the top 200 web sites * e.g. Alexa top 500 * do they conform to the current draft? * are the ways they don't conform captured in an issues list? * which features do they use? * are they mobile-happy, WAI-happy? -- http://esw.w3.org/topic/HtmlTaskBrainstorm -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Tuesday, 24 April 2007 22:22:59 UTC