- From: Matt Freels <freels@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 11:55:52 +0200
- To: matt@builtfromsource.com
- Cc: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
At least as far as safari goes, Macej's quirksmode test: <!DOCTYPE html5> <style> .foo { width: 400px; height: 400px; background-color: lime; background-color: ff0000; } </style> <div class="foo"></div> ...shows a red square for either <!DOCTYPE html> or <!DOCTYPE html5>. I don't know if it's actually bailing out to quirksmode, or just incorrectly parsing the background-color hex incorrectly anyways. FWIW, the test works correctly in recent WebKit builds. Cheers! Matt (Freels) Il giorno 14/apr/07, alle ore 00:02, Matthew Ratzloff ha scritto: > > On Fri, April 13, 2007 2:55 pm, Arthur Jennings wrote: >> Perhaps this is a dumb question, but why can't "<!DOCTYPE html>" >> be that >> clearly identifiable identifier? I doubt it currently occurs in >> the wild >> outside of authors who are anticipating HTML 5. > > Safari and Firefox don't recognize "<!DOCTYPE html>" as a valid > doctype, > instead bailing out to quirks mode. > > -Matt > >
Received on Saturday, 14 April 2007 11:01:02 UTC