- From: Brad Fults <bfults@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 19:58:40 -0700
- To: "T.V Raman" <raman@google.com>
- Cc: giovanni.gentili@gmail.com, public-html@w3.org
On 4/3/07, T.V Raman <raman@google.com> wrote: > > > And I thought version numbers were out of fashion :-) That's actually an interesting question if one of the principles that is going to be adhered to is lack of version syntax [1]. Should the language specification itself have a version? Could it just end up being "HTML"? Are other acronyms precluded by the group charter? [1] - http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML/ProposedDesignPrinciples#head-4a3dff6ff01c60eb72d8fa8ee1d0c2540e40ff8c -- Brad Fults
Received on Wednesday, 4 April 2007 02:58:44 UTC