- From: Raven Brooks <ravenbrooks@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 15:03:07 -0700
- To: public-html@w3.org
- Message-ID: <ee3dce990704041503t1a0c8c1bgeccab7bb31aabe00@mail.gmail.com>
+1 for the term idea because it would provide semantic meaning for the enclosed text. Using CSS you could hide the definition and show it when a user's cursor rolls over the term, you could provide definitions as footnotes in print friendly forms, and presumably search engines and the like could make use of it. On 4/4/07, Robert Brodrecht <w3c@robertdot.org> wrote: > > > Rene Saarsoo wrote: > > <term> looks nice and seems to fill many uses of <i> and <b>, although > > using it to mark up text in foreign languages might not always be > > appropriate. > > I also find myself using <q> to delineate "so-called" type strings (e.g. > He was the <q>first</q> to come up with <em>that</em> idea, too.) and > other bits of sarcasm where my brain normally throws air quotes (which are > different than speaking something with emphasis). <term> might be able to > fill this gap, as well, if there are attributes to extend it. > > -- > Robert <http://robertdot.org> > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 4 April 2007 23:52:36 UTC