- From: Dão Gottwald <dao@design-noir.de>
- Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 00:11:01 +0200
- To: Doug Schepers <doug.schepers@vectoreal.com>
- CC: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
Doug Schepers schrieb: >> Ultimately I think we'll have to deal with switching mechanisms >> though. Mozilla currently only has two major (and one "minor") modes >> and hopefully we'll be able to stick to that for a long time to come. >> But I think we should assume that more modes might happen in the >> future, so it would be good if the spec had some way of dealing with >> this. But you realize that Microsoft wants to introduce a new mode for each of the coming IE releases? (And they want to release often.) >> That said, I really like the <!DOCTYPE html> "doctype" since it's very >> short and easy to remember. So I'd probably lean towards adding a >> version attribute to the html element. > > As would I. I suspect I missed the part of this discussion where <html > version="5.0"> was roundly dismissed as completely unworkable... could > someone please enlighten me why that's a problem? I didn't participate in the discussions at the WHATWG, but I assume that most reasons to avoid versioning apply to the root element as well as the doctype. --Dao
Received on Tuesday, 17 April 2007 22:11:16 UTC