- From: James Graham <jg307@cam.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 09:31:01 +0100
- To: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Cc: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>, Chris Wilson <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com>, public-html@w3.org
Henri Sivonen wrote: > > On Apr 19, 2007, at 04:18, Lachlan Hunt wrote: > >> It would really help if you would actually do some research about (or >> at least listen to) what authors actually want, instead of being >> presumptuous. > > To find out what authors want (in the sense that is useful for designing > a bug mode switch that has to work with the real author behavior in the > common case), one should look at the reactions of authors to past > stimuli (instances of browser changes, etc.) instead of believing what > they say they want. > Indeed, although in this case the past stimulus (a single doctype-based mode switch that affected rendering in all major browsers) is considerably different from what is being proposed for the future (multiple modes working in only a single browser tying the rendering to specific releases of that browser). The circumstances under which an IE-specific opt-in should be used ("if you are serving different content to IE and other browsers through any HTTP/HTML/DOM/CSS differentiation") are very different from those in which you want to trigger the exisitng standards modes ("if you want the browser to have as few rendering bugs as possible"). Given that, it's not entirely clear that we would see the same pattern of use in the two situations i.e. the fact that a number of the top 200 sites use standards mode but break in IE7 does not mean that the same fraction of sites would be broken in IE7 if they'd had the option of including a well-documented IE6-mode switch, even if "standards mode" continued to trigger the new IE7 behavior. Those sites that did break could trivially have added the switch during the IE7 beta period. -- "Instructions to follow very carefully. Go to Tesco's. Go to the coffee aisle. Look at the instant coffee. Notice that Kenco now comes in refil packs. Admire the tray on the shelf. It's exquiste corrugated boxiness. The way how it didn't get crushed on its long journey from the factory. Now pick up a refil bag. Admire the antioxidant claim. Gaze in awe at the environmental claims written on the back of the refil bag. Start stroking it gently, its my packaging precious, all mine.... Be thankful that Amy has only given you the highlights of the reasons why that bag is so brilliant." -- ajs
Received on Thursday, 19 April 2007 08:32:13 UTC