- From: Preston L. Bannister <preston@bannister.us>
- Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:36:27 -0700
- To: "Dmitry Turin" <html60@narod.ru>
- Cc: public-html@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 24 April 2007 17:36:29 UTC
On 4/24/07, Dmitry Turin <html60@narod.ru> wrote: > > > >> My interest would be in populating the table with a single round trip > > Preston, what defect has the following construction > ("tc" means "table column"): > > <table attribute="special"> > <tr> > <th id=10>ColName1</th> > <th id=20>ColName2</th> > <th id=30>ColName3</th> > </tr> > <tc> > <th id=1>RowName1</th> > <th id=2>RowName2</th> > <th id=3>RowName3</th> > </tc> > <data> > <td row=1 col=10>Data11</td> > <td row=1 col=20>Data12</td> > <td row=1 col=30>Data13</td> > <td row=2 col=10>Data21</td> > <td row=2 col=20>Data22</td> > <td row=2 col=30>Data23</td> > <td row=3 col=10>Data31</td> > <td row=3 col=20>Data32</td> > <td row=3 col=30>Data33</td> > </data> > </table> > Other than the notion of a column (or columns) of row headers, the above seems like just another way of doing what you can the existing HTML (you might want to check out <col> and <colgroup>). There does seem to be a lack in the area of row and column headers - with coupled but independent scrolling of the body (for large tables). As to what form that should take, I as yet have no opinion.
Received on Tuesday, 24 April 2007 17:36:29 UTC