- From: Asbjørn Ulsberg <asbjorn@ulsberg.no>
- Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2007 03:27:53 +0200
- To: "Geoffrey Sneddon" <foolistbar@googlemail.com>, "T.V Raman" <raman@google.com>
- Cc: public-html@w3.org
On Sun, 01 Apr 2007 01:55:14 +0200, Geoffrey Sneddon <foolistbar@googlemail.com> wrote: > For XHTML the content of the text construct MUST be a single XHTML div > element, and for HTML it SHOULD be valid directly within a div element. Just for the record; I know what the Atom specification says, I have been participating in the ATOMPUB WG since its inception. ;) > As for it being valid, the conditions within the specifications imply: > there is more to validity than a DTD. HTML currently doesn't define > fragments. The fact we don't know whether we should treat HTML content > as the contents of a div element makes it further hard to determine > whether something is valid. Thus, I conclude that the HTML specification should define framents and how HTML can be embedded in other formats as a content-describing markup language. Seeing as it's already used that way, there's clearly a strong use-case for it that I believe this WG should cater to. > Alas, I hope this all makes sense, it's almost 1am and I'm drop dead > tired. It's 03:25 here and way over bed time, but this is unfortunately the only spare time I have to use on this mailing list. :-| -- Asbjørn Ulsberg -=|=- asbjorn@ulsberg.no «He's a loathsome offensive brute, yet I can't look away»
Received on Sunday, 1 April 2007 01:25:13 UTC