- From: Murray Maloney <murray@muzmo.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 13:39:27 -0400
- To: public-html@w3.org
I couldn't agree more with T.V. Raman on this matter. I suggest that we promote this statement to the status of Design Principle. At 09:05 AM 4/16/2007 -0700, T.V Raman wrote: >If we're talking about HTML producing pixel perfect rendering, >then I suggest it's time to press the reset button -- that was >never HTML's goal, and nor should it ever become its goal. > >Ian Hickson writes: > > > > On Sat, 14 Apr 2007, Chris Wilson wrote: > > > > > > > > Could you give any concrete examples of vagueness? I'd like to fix > any > > > > that are unintentional. > > > > > > <canvas>. You've specified an entire immediate-mode graphics api, more > > > extensive in some ways than GDI, without describing the parameters or > > > giving rendering rules to get interoperable pixel-perfect rendering. > > > > Could you be more specific? What parameters do you think should be > > specified and which rendering rules do you think are needed to get > > interoperable pixel-perfect rendering? > > > > Cheers, > > -- > > Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL > > http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. > > Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.' > >-- >Best Regards, >--raman > >Title: Research Scientist >Email: raman@google.com >WWW: http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman/ >Google: tv+raman >GTalk: raman@google.com, tv.raman.tv@gmail.com >PGP: http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman/raman-almaden.asc
Received on Monday, 16 April 2007 17:41:43 UTC