- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 23:01:59 -0700
- To: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
* I promoted "Separation of Concerns" out of the disputed section, because I think the new form is no longer disputed. Holler if you still dispute the below text: SeparationOfConcerns: HTML should allow separation of content and presentation. For this reason, markup that expresses semantics is usually preferred to purely presentational markup. However, semantic markup is a means to an end such as MediaIndependence. Profound and detailed semantic encoding is not necessary if the end can be reached otherwise. For example by defining reasonable default presentation for different media may be sufficient, as for the <b> and <i> elements. HTML Strikes a balance between semantic expressiveness and practical usefulness. Names of elements and attributes in the markup may be pragmatic (for brevity, history, simplicity) rather than completely accurate. * I also expanded the "Support Extensions" principle, but left it in the Disputed section. I'm not sure how much we want this in the design principles. It seems like a fine requirement, but I am not sure it works as an overarching principle like security. I'm also not totally clear on what use cases people have in mind when they ask for this. So I am inclined to drop it. * The Metadata and Versioning principles are still in the disputed section because, so far as I know, they are still hotly disputed. Regards, Maciej
Received on Thursday, 12 April 2007 06:02:11 UTC