Re: HTML5 vs HTML6

After all it's just soup:-) Sounds pretty nutty to have a version
number for it:-) --- but then again perhaps it's a soup to nuts
story ...

Brad Fults writes:
 > On 4/3/07, T.V Raman <raman@google.com> wrote:
 > >
 > >
 > > And I thought version numbers were out of fashion :-)
 > 
 > That's actually an interesting question if one of the principles that
 > is going to be adhered to is lack of version syntax [1]. Should the
 > language specification itself have a version?
 > 
 > Could it just end up being "HTML"? Are other acronyms precluded by the
 > group charter?
 > 
 > [1] - http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML/ProposedDesignPrinciples#head-4a3dff6ff01c60eb72d8fa8ee1d0c2540e40ff8c
 > 
 > -- 
 > Brad Fults

-- 
Best Regards,
--raman

Title:  Research Scientist      
Email:  raman@google.com
WWW:    http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman/
Google: tv+raman 
GTalk:  raman@google.com, tv.raman.tv@gmail.com
PGP:    http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman/raman-almaden.asc

Received on Wednesday, 4 April 2007 03:32:58 UTC