- From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 12:42:48 +0300
- To: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Cc: Chris Wilson <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
On Apr 20, 2007, at 11:34, Karl Dubost wrote: > * It is *very* satisfying for members of the WG to be able to say I > have written this part. I don't like the above point at all as part of rationale for a particular way of working. I think the WG should choose working methods that are optimized for producing the best possible spec over working methods that are optimized for making people feel good about having made their mark. Considering what has been discussed so far and considering experience from the WHATWG, I believe that having Hixie as the editor who also produces the prose based on feedback and having WG members repeatedly review the draft (ideally by reading the SVN logs) is the way of working that optimizes spec quality. -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen@iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Friday, 20 April 2007 09:43:08 UTC