www-font@w3.org from July to September 2009 by subject

"Web fonts - where are we?"

"Web fonts — where are we?"

"wrapper format" (was: restarting discussion)


.screenfonts (was: Re: Merits and deficiencies of EOT Lite)

.screenfonts [and optical sizes]

.screenfonts P.S.

.webfont Proposal

.webfont Proposal 2

.webfont Proposal 2.1

[css3-fonts] Comments on @font-face: local(...)

[humor] Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format

[OpenFontLibrary] Fwd: www-font: WebOTF Proposal

a basic question

A way forward

A way forward (was: Webfont compression)

A way forward - I Propose An Active Adjournment For Assessment

Another web font linking progress summary

apologies and decision table

CFF and Uniscribe

CFF and Uniscribe (was: Merits and deficiencies of EOT Lite)

Combining ZOT with .webfont metadata

Combining ZOT with .webfont metadata?

compressed fonts: a proposed format

CORS Access-Control-Allow-Origin "*" headers in Apache (Was Re: .webfont Proposal)

cutting to the chase

EOT & DMCA concerns

EOT and EOT-based proposals

EOT and EOT-based proposals - Sounds good to this DINOSAUR

EOT Lite (Compatibility Web Type) - sample web pages

EOT Lite - possible outcomes

EOT Lite spec?

EOT usage technique

EOT-Lite and ZOT Firefox test build available

EOT-Lite clarification

EOT-Lite File Format

EOT-Lite File Format 1.2 (was RE: EOT & DMCA concerns)

EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1

EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1 (and possibly v.1.2)

EOT-Lite testing for IE 6

EOT/TTF : Struggle for the life ?!

EOTL font file specification version 1

Font license vs. conversion between font formats

Font MIME type (was RE: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1)

Font optimizer tool

Fonts and security

Fonts and security (was: The unmentionable)

Fonts WG Charter feedback

Fonts WG Charter feedback -- iNDIFFERENT OBSERVATION

format changes as false protection

Format name proposals

Format name proposals - "Cooperable Web Type"

Formats and Licensing

Formats and Licensing (Re: A way forward)

Fwd: [OpenFontLibrary] Fwd: www-font: WebOTF Proposal

Fwd: Re: [OpenFontLibrary] Fwd: www-font: WebOTF Proposal

hope for a way forward

I expect all foundries to start offering web font licenses within 6 months.


Merits and deficiencies of EOT Lite

Merits and deficiencies of EOT Lite (was: Combining ZOT with .webfont metadata)

New file format names

Next step?

Not replacing OTF/TTF linking

OT: max-width [Was: Re: EOT/TTF : Struggle for the life ?!]

Partial fonts

Problems with style-linked EOTs

progress on mutual understanding

Questions re web-fonts

RFC: EOTL font file specification version 1

Rumours of the death of "new, professionally designed typefaces" are perhaps exaggerated?

Same-origin policies (Re: The other party in all this)

same-origin restrictions and EULA (Re: A way forward)

single-question poll - font vendors and browser devs

Some history of font sharing

Support for Tal's webfont proposal on twitter, and Berlow's PERM table proposal

Supporting EOT-Lite

the discussion is over, resistance time

the importance of fonts (silly)

The other party in all this

The sad thing is, these things are all over the place... (silly)

the truth which dare not speak it's name

The unmentionable

The unmentionable (was: "A way forward")

TypeCon liveblogging

updated WOFF specification

Use What Is There -

Web font linking progress summary

Webfont compression

WebOTF Proposal

WebOTF Proposal: updated description and sample code


Windows EOT name table limit (was: EOT-Lite and ZOT Firefox test build available)

Last message date: Wednesday, 16 September 2009 14:20:13 UTC