RE: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1

On Friday, July 31, 2009 2:36 PM Sylvain Galineau wrote:
> 
> What I can assert is that no rootstring can be circumvented in
> the current EOTL proposal since they cannot even be stored in
> the file, and that any file using Monotype's patented technology
> must be rejected.


Unless we reach a consensus for MTX to become part of EOT-Lite, and then
patented technology is licensed on unrestricted RF terms and is no
longer an issue, as is the case with any other W3C Recommendation.

Vladimir

Received on Friday, 31 July 2009 20:29:09 UTC