RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback

Thomas Lord [] wrote:
>On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 23:56 +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
>> Not sure why that would be the case.  If it enables more fonts to be licensed for web use, then why would they object?
>Because "more fonts" in your sense is a transient
>concern and in this case it comes at high expense
>to users.  It is the opposite of what a reputable
>standards party should do.

I don't know why you think licensing is a "transient concern."

Received on Friday, 3 July 2009 00:16:52 UTC