- From: Thomas Lord <lord@emf.net>
- Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 18:54:50 -0700
- To: Thomas Phinney <tphinney@cal.berkeley.edu>
- Cc: www-font <www-font@w3.org>, "Levantovsky, Vladimir" <Vladimir.Levantovsky@monotypeimaging.com>, Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>, Dave Crossland <dave@lab6.com>
On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 17:52 -0700, Thomas Phinney wrote: > Of course, if you want to take Microsoft's disinterest in supporting > naked TTF/OTF fonts on web servers as a declaration of war, that is > your perogative. How else could one possibly take it? > But gosh, if you're going to do that, perhaps somebody else should > form an similarly-named committee that aims to protect the noble and > oppressed type designers from nasty people who want to force all > browsers to work with easily pirated fonts, I'm sure it's likely that someone will if things continue on their current course. > significantly reducing the > revenue type designers get from anyone except those big corporations > that can't be seen participating in font piracy. That is hardly what's at stake here. -t > Cheers, > > T > > On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Thomas Lord<lord@emf.net> wrote: > > The discussion is heated to the point of a > > melt-down. Let those of us who care about > > the web step back and take a look at the > > bigger picture. > > > > Chris Wilson of Microsoft has stated an > > apparently authoritative Microsoft position > > on this matter. He says that no proposal > > is acceptable to Microsoft which includes a > > requirement of supporting raw TT and OT > > linking. > > > > This is significant because TT and OT are > > very widely supported and so they are the most > > natural formats to support. > > > > Offers have been made to require TT and OT > > along with some third format, whether Ascender's > > or my wrapper. Microsoft has said "no" even > > though these counter proposals satisfy all > > stated concerns of the font vendors representing > > themselves here. > > > > It would be a simple matter for any third party > > to publicly offer a patch to IE to support > > OT and TT except that IE has a restricted > > license that forbids that kind of thing. > > > > In that way, Microsoft is claiming power over > > its users and here leveraging that power > > to, pardon me but, f- with the serious work > > of an international standards organization. > > I don't think it is too much of an exaggeration > > to say that Microsoft is attempting to treat > > IE users as a form of hostages who act as > > a bargaining chip. > > > > So, Microsoft has said "no," we are given > > to understand. In that case... > > > > We owe it to the users of IE not to leave them > > at the mercy of such bad, anti-competitive > > behavior from Microsoft. > > > > Instead, we should use this opportunity to encourage > > those users to switch away from IE. > > > > I propose the formation of a political resistance > > committee: the Committee for Web Font Sanity. > > I invite the CC list to help form the committee > > or others who might have something to contribute. > > I invite the larger community to participate and > > help to support the committee's work. > > > > The Web Font Sanity committee will, if formed, > > and if joined by supporters, attempt to encourage > > multiple, highly popular web services to begin to > > make significant use of TT and OT web fonts in ways > > that users really appreciate yet can't experience > > when using IE. We can target blog hosts and bloggers, > > social networking sites, news sites, and so forth. > > We can ask those sites include statements about > > why IE is not preferred for viewing those sites. > > > > Simultaneously we can begin an educational campaign > > to inform the public of Microsoft's intransigence on > > this issue and the impact of it on the "user experience". > > > > Above all, in combination with that message, we can > > begin to instruct the IE-using public on how easily > > they can migrate to a free software browser and how > > that can benefit their web experience. > > > > A committee can begin to draw press attention to the > > issue, in various ways. > > > > The users of IE are, in my opinion, effectively being > > held hostage in an extortion attempt by Microsoft, > > at least if we understand Chris Wilson's statements > > to be definitive. > > > > Just as an honorable passer by would not leave a man > > trapped under a burning car if there was any choice > > on the matter, we owe it to those IE users to free them. > > > > -t > > > > p.s.: credit where credit is due: > > > > Håkon suggested that W3C itself should start using TT > > and/or OT fonts on w3c.org and that was where I got > > the inspiration. I'm just extending that idea. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > "Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up > and hurry off as if nothing ever happened." > - Sir Winston Churchill >
Received on Thursday, 2 July 2009 01:55:31 UTC