- From: Thomas Lord <lord@emf.net>
- Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2009 11:08:46 -0700
- To: François REMY <fremycompany_pub@yahoo.fr>
- Cc: Chris Fynn <cfynn@gmx.net>, www-font <www-font@w3.org>, John Hudson <tiro@tiro.com>, Ben Weiner <ben@readingtype.org.uk>
On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 10:12 +0200, François REMY wrote: > False. EOTC has been proposed as standard by Microsoft and all > technologies related to him (MTX...) are beeing opened by Microsoft > and Monotype Imaging. Any browser could implement EOTC. > > The problem is that no browser *want* to do so. None of the other browser makers want to implement the protection features of that proposal. If people who currently have restricted license fonts in the wild in EOT were to assert that other browsers should go ahead and implement EOT but without any kind of enforcement, some other browser implementers would likely still object but the case in favor would at least be a lot stronger. -t
Received on Thursday, 6 August 2009 18:09:33 UTC