W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-font@w3.org > July to September 2009

Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 10:48:34 +1200
Message-ID: <11e306600907311548pa4fada7n28a21440507bd95@mail.gmail.com>
To: info@ascenderfonts.com
Cc: www-font <www-font@w3.org>
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 10:35 AM, Bill Davis <info@ascenderfonts.com> wrote:

> Robert, first of all, we can only speak for Ascender. Every other type
> designer & foundry can and will have their own EULA.
> But I don't understand why you are bringing up rootstrings. They are not
> part of the EOT Lite specification.
> I think you are overly complicating things. Or maybe I am missing your
> point?

How do you expect authors to comply with your EULA requirement for access
control, for IE<=8 users?

I see only two realistic options:
1) Referer checking
2) Rootstrings in the font

Referer checking sucks. Rootstrings suck less.

"He was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities;
the punishment that brought us peace was upon him, and by his wounds we are
healed. We all, like sheep, have gone astray, each of us has turned to his
own way; and the LORD has laid on him the iniquity of us all." [Isaiah
Received on Friday, 31 July 2009 22:49:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:37:33 UTC