- From: Dirk Pranke <dpranke@chromium.org>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 18:56:12 -0700
- To: John Hudson <tiro@tiro.com>
- Cc: www-font@w3.org
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 6:18 PM, John Hudson<tiro@tiro.com> wrote: > What the non-IE browser makers have indicated that they do not want is > technical protections of a kind that would require them to enforce anything > and potentially expose them to DMCA lawsuits. Such protections are not on > the table. > > [ ... snip ... ] > > An attempt to interpret the clearly stated position of the browser makers to > imply that *any* kind of protection at all is anathema and 'will not fly', > is unsupportable. The browser makers have already indicated what kinds of > protections they would be willing to accept in a web font format. Apart from the first paragraph, I am curious what you believe "what kinds of protections [the browser makers] would be willing to accept" to be. -- Dirk (Not speaking for Chromium, Google Chrome, or Google in any way)
Received on Wednesday, 29 July 2009 01:56:53 UTC